Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 06:30:07 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: So It Wasnt All Down To Gox?  (Read 2101 times)
Bonio (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 10:58:53 AM
 #1

My first post here although I have been reading for months but recent events have spurred me on to 'put pen to paper'. So hi Smiley

Going on recent posts and hysteria from many posters who (and I may be wrong) seem like over excitable school girls I'm expecting the worse in any replies but nothing ventured nothing learned!

I have to hold my hand up and say I have 'coin at Mtgox, but I have it spread around elsewhere too, I personaly dont trust 'gox but then I dont trust any other exchange any more and on the plus side 'gox has up until now bounced back after the problems they have had and we all know exactly where to find them if we need to Smiley For balance I cant withdraw my money form any of the other exchanges that have locked down withdrawals either.

So my question, should we be thanking mtgox for alerting us of a potential problem and doing the right thing by stopping withdrawls and protecting our money or do people still believe its all mtgox's fault and things would have just been fine as they have been?

Speaking as a mature level headed adult who is comfortable with his investments in Bitcoin (and some other crypto's) my view is this mass hysteria, swearing and hatefull posts is doing the whole Bitcoin 'indusrty' nothing but harm if we want tor make the future of Bitcoin secure.

Tin hat on Wink


hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2644


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 11:18:24 AM
 #2

The issue was already known. The problem was with how Gox handled it causing everybody to panic thinking Bitcoin was fucked.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
DubFX
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 11:20:22 AM
 #3

I think we have right to blame gox, they didn't handle the whole thing.
Bonio (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 11:52:10 AM
 #4

How could they of handled it better?

There is a chance I suppose that they are just using it as an excuse but lets say they arent, just for discusson, What should they have done?

I think their initial post may have been vague because they didnt want to allert everyone to the fact that there was a potential security problem. But then why did the people in the know rubbish their second statement with the reason they had closed the withdrwal lines?

It all seems a bit confused, dont the devs talk to the big exchanges?

anti-scam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251


COINECT


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 11:57:35 AM
 #5

How could they of handled it better?

There is a chance I suppose that they are just using it as an excuse but lets say they arent, just for discusson, What should they have done?

I think their initial post may have been vague because they didnt want to allert everyone to the fact that there was a potential security problem. But then why did the people in the know rubbish their second statement with the reason they had closed the withdrwal lines?

It all seems a bit confused, dont the devs talk to the big exchanges?

They could have handled it better by implementing the protocol correctly in the first place. It's like complaining that Spanish is a flawed language because the fact that "embarazada" means pregnant and not "embarrassed" confuses you.

.
                ▄▄▓▓▄▄   ▄▓▓▓▄
            ▄▄▓▓▀    ▀▓▓▓▀   ▀▓▓▓▄
         ▄▓▓▀▀        ▐▓         ▀▓▓▓
         ▓▓   ░▓▓▒    ▐▓     ▓▓░   ▐▓
         ▓▓    ░▀▓▓   ▐▓   ░▓▀▀    ▐▓
      ▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░  ▓▓   ▐▓   ░▓   ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▄
    ▓▓▀     ▀▀   ▓▓   ▐▓   ░▓▄   ▀▀    ▀▓▓░
    ▓▓        ▓▓▓░    ▐▓     ▀▓▓▄        ▓░
    ▓▓▄▄▄    ▐▓░   ▄▓▄▓▓▒▄▓▄   ▓▓░   ▄▄▄▄▓░
    ▓▓▀▀▀    ▐▓░   ▀▀▀▓▓▒▀▀    ▓▓░   ▀▀▀▒▓░
    ▓▓        ▀▓▓▓▄   ▐▓    ▄▓▓▓▀       ░▓░
    ▀▓▓▄▄  ▄▓▄   ▓▓   ▐▓   ▐▓▒   ▓▄   ▄▓▓▓░
        ▀▓▓▓▀▀   ▓▓   ▐▓   ▐▓░   ▀▀▓▓▓▀░
         ▓▓    ▄▓▓▓   ▐▓    ▓▓▄░   ▐▓░░
         ▀▓▄   ▀▓     ▐▓     ▀▀   ▄▓▓░
           ▀▓▓▓▄      ▓▓░      ▄▓▓▀░
               ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▀░▓▓▓▄▓▓▓░
.
COINECT
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
AI-based decentralized
arbitrage trading system
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.

 
                              ▄████▄
                        ▄▄█████▀▀███
                    ▄▄████▀▀     ███
              ▄▄▄████▀▀    ▄▄   ▐██
          ▄▄█████▀       ▄█▀    ██▌
     ▄▄████▀▀▀       ▄███▀      ██▌
    ████▀        ▄▄████▀       ▐██
     ██████▄▄  ▄█████▀         ██▌
          ▀████████           ▐██
            ▀████▌            ███
             ▀███  ▄██▄▄     ▐██▀
              ███▄███▀███▄   ███
              ▀███▀▀   ▀▀███▄██▌
                          ▀▀█▀▀
.

▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█   ▄▄▄▄▄▄   ██▄
█  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌  ████▄
█  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌  ███████▄
█  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌  ▐▓███████▄
█              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█
█  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  █
█                      █
█  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  █
█  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  █
█                      █
█  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  █
█                      █
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
stompix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 6408


Blackjack.fun


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:25:00 PM
 #6

How could they of handled it better?

There is a chance I suppose that they are just using it as an excuse but lets say they arent, just for discusson, What should they have done?

I think their initial post may have been vague because they didnt want to allert everyone to the fact that there was a potential security problem. But then why did the people in the know rubbish their second statement with the reason they had closed the withdrwal lines?

It all seems a bit confused, dont the devs talk to the big exchanges?

Just like the other exchangers who miraculously haven't experienced gox problems.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
fbueller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 412
Merit: 275


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:34:43 PM
 #7

I'm pretty sure a node started spamming the network with transactions it had tweaked using the malleability issue after MtGOX released their news. After this some transactions I made were recast by someone else.

The person behind the second attack, where non-GOX transactions were affected, may not have been the person who caused the initial issues for MtGOX. Once other transactions started getting effected, exchanges had a reason to be concerned. The first person could have chosen a different exchange to attack, but if the attackers are the same person, hitting MtGOX first (the biggest), and then showing everyone else could be affected would be a great way to shake confidence.

Bitwasp Developer.
Biomech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:46:55 PM
 #8

As others have stated, the issue was known, and has been addressed by the dev's. Greg Maxwell, in particular, has stated that the "flaw" only is a problem to Gox because of them using a very custom implementation of the wallet that does not handle the problem correctly.

I've never used Gox, so I don't have a personal story one way or the other. But by observation, I'd have to say that they have been extremely sloppy over a long period of time. I'd like to jump on the "scam" bandwagon, just because they look scammy in this, but I think it's more likely incompetence and arrogance. Number one postion makes you the number one target, and they didn't wear proper armor.

I'm all for customization where it makes sense, but if you have a wallet design that doesn't address an issue that has been in the open for some year until JUST NOW, then you did it wrong.

I think this will all sort itself out, and I think that Gox will need to get a lot smarter, a lot more efficient, and a lot more transparent THIS WEEK, or they will become part of Bitcoin's history rather quickly.

Of course, I could be wrong. They make a lot of money, and that can gloss over a lot of stupidity.
Bonio (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 12:55:09 PM
 #9


Just like the other exchangers who miraculously haven't experienced gox problems.


Am I missing something here though, other exhanges I use have also shut down withdrawal or is this not related to the problem Gox had, I realise Gox have obviously been using flawed code but if the other exchanges dont have the same problem why the big shutdown?

It is all a bit confused right now, which is what you would expect from a de-centralized operation Smiley

atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:01:31 PM
 #10

There honestly should be no pointing of fingers.  

Gox certainly (being the oldest exchange) should have been the first exchange to implement their own secondary txid verification measures, but i am quite sure (most) all the exchanges have failed to provide adequate security measures against this issue.

In a sense, Gox was merely the trigger for a situation that had to happen: Malleability has to be mitigated from the core code because this issue is not going away until the protocol is hardened against exploitation of this type.

I am glad it happened now as opposed to when the btc network is worth trillions.
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2644


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:13:51 PM
 #11

How could they of handled it better?

There is a chance I suppose that they are just using it as an excuse but lets say they arent, just for discusson, What should they have done?

I think their initial post may have been vague because they didnt want to allert everyone to the fact that there was a potential security problem. But then why did the people in the know rubbish their second statement with the reason they had closed the withdrwal lines?

It all seems a bit confused, dont the devs talk to the big exchanges?

They could've solved the problem on their end by updating their programs like they were told they should do. Putting the message out there like they did only caused panic. They also need to stop running a shoddy business and stop blaming other things.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
Miz4r
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:31:24 PM
 #12


Just like the other exchangers who miraculously haven't experienced gox problems.


Am I missing something here though, other exhanges I use have also shut down withdrawal or is this not related to the problem Gox had, I realise Gox have obviously been using flawed code but if the other exchanges dont have the same problem why the big shutdown?

It is all a bit confused right now, which is what you would expect from a de-centralized operation Smiley

When MtGox found out someone was exploiting a vulnerability in their automated BTC withdrawal software to basically steal bitcoins there was no DoS attack on the network globally going on. That attack only started after MtGox released their statement blaming a well known issue for their problems. Other exchanges like Bitstamp can not be exploited the same way as MtGox, so the reason why they suspended BTC withdrawals is different and directly related to this new DoS attack. They just have to update their software so transactions can get properly confirmed again and bitcoin withdrawals can resume as usual. MtGox is in deeper shit right now.

Bitcoin = Gold on steroids
riclas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 106


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:38:20 PM
 #13

There are two very different problems here.
Mtgox had a bug in their wallet that made them lose some funds due to transaction malleability. This is their fault, they should have fixed it when they were warned years ago, but they didnt. If people panicked because of their announcement it is because those people didn't trust mtgox in the first place. No panic was to be had with the statement they produced.

On a second note, by bringing to light the problem of transaction malleability, someone started to DDoS the bitcoin network. This put malleability on the top priority list for bitcoin, if it wasn't there as gregory maxwell says in his interview.

So i feel that mtgox is at fault for not updating their software when suggested, but it turns out for the better that this DDoS happened because of their flaw now, rather than later. Both mtgox and the btc foundation should have been more careful with their statements, instead of pushing blame to eachother.

portuguese p2p trader. telegram @riclas
btcash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 968
Merit: 515



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 01:40:26 PM
 #14

Quote
So i feel that mtgox is at fault for not updating their software when suggested, but it turns out for the better that this DDoS happened because of their flaw now, rather than later. Both mtgox and the btc foundation should have been more careful with their statements, instead of pushing blame to eachother.
+1
This summarizes the situation pretty good.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2014, 02:23:49 PM
 #15

Gox is at fault. The other exchanges were fine.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Mobo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 02:31:27 PM
 #16

First of all welcome! Gox isnt 100% to blame but they did start this.
Bonio (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 02:50:56 PM
 #17

Gox is at fault. The other exchanges were fine.

Maybe not so: http://blog.bitbargain.com/post/76337403346/bitcoin-malleability-issue

"It turns out that this issue is indeed affecting everyone. Mt.Gox and BTC-e have disabled withdrawals, Bitstamp is considering it, Localbitcoins is considering it, Bittylicious is considering it. We are in contact with each other as well as the developers of Bitcoin."


Borbolon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 03:03:34 PM
 #18

Bitcoin's endgame? Bitstamp also suspends withdrawals: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=461841.0
Sheldor333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 03:17:17 PM
 #19

How come all the major exchanges had experienced the same problem, even though the problem was already known. Did they use the same code? Or did they all ignore the problem tough it would go away?

Bonio (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 12, 2014, 03:59:38 PM
 #20

This was the reason for my orginal post, I am usnure Gox deserved all the screaming outrage and rabid posts that were aimed in their direction, maybe just some Smiley

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!