Thank you for the kind words.
but we saw so many average post that get so many merits. on the other hand, very quality post get nothing(max case). Though the Taste is may be different. but My question is do u think current merit system is ok for everyone or do u think it would be modified in some cases?
Meriting a post actually depends on the individuals. No two people will have the same parameter to evaluate a merit worthy post. Some may find a good post worth 1 merit, some may find the same post worth 50 merits, others may think it's not merit worthy at all. I read a good post from seoincorporation I guess - he was categorizing to evaluate a post which seemed standard to me, although so many will disagree with me and seoincorporation, like I said no two person will have same parameter for justifying a post.
I see LoyceV easily (compliment) send out merits, Jet Cash looks for very high quality (again compliment), I see suchmoon gives out 5 - 7 merits (very generous) when s/he thinks a post is merit worthy, vod also is very generous when it comes to meriting a post. I personally can not afford to give more than one merit.
By the way, these are the members I see everyday so I bought them as examples. There are others as well like TMAN, Welsh, pugman, Foxpup, QuestionAuthority, DarkStar_, OgNasty, The Pharmacist, LFC_Bitcoin even theymos himself etc. It is hard to find that two of them has similar pattern.
My question is do u think current merit system is ok for everyone or do u think it would be modified in some cases?
Personally I am quite ok with the current outcome although we have seen number of abuses (abuses still exist though but not very high in scale like before). Every system has a system lose and you can not avoid it. Also, anything can be improvised so do the merit system if the admin wants. We have talked about it so many times. Feel free to explore. In summary, the overall Merit system is working wonderful IMO.
