Negative trusted bounty managers

[cryptobull3]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

[jrrsparkles]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

Most of the managers were tagged for cheating the campaigns with alt accounts but it is not a scam just an untrustworthy behavior,but still they were managing the campaigns so the ICO team trusting them,so we need to work on the bounties based on the ICO team not on the bounty managers.

[NeuroticFish]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects?

Negative feedback is given to reflect somebody's opinion. The best approach is to read yourself the reason for the feedback, since sometimes it's not a problem at all, but sometimes it's better to stay away.

One of the bounties I've participated this year was managed by somebody with negative trust. He got the red because he is not careful enough with people's shares and the way he manages the campaigns generates a lot of spam. Indeed, both claims were correct I've found out, but he was fair and paid my shares.

I see now that one of the managers "promotes scam ICO". Well, this is a problem. The hardest job for a bounty manager is to check the background of the project. If he doesn't do that, we have a problem. If people find out the project is a scam, the bounty manager has to act very fast and close the bounty. Just check what yahoo62278 did with a bounty that has be proven to be scam (since even he is not perfect):

This campaign is closing. I have decided not to continue working with this team due to the recent scam accusations and possible ponzi claims.

Everyone was paid as a pay per post vs straight pay since I ended it a few hours early.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.0 Read about the accusations here and also in their ANN thread. You may all remove your sigs

If this happens with a bounty you are in, you may also get flagged for promoting a scam. And this could get your bitcointalk account flagged or your twitter/fb accounts blocked. That's why you have to be very careful on what bounty manager you trust.

[medussa]

The integrity of the bounty manager is important. It can tell badly on the project as it is one of the red flags of a scam project

[fempat]

It's better to stay away than join their campaigns and not get paid.  There are many reasons why they may have negative trust. We don't know for sure.  But since there are many others like sylon that have good reputation and manage very good bounties,  why not join them instead?

[Sabinas17]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

I participated in the projects needmoney, there are a lot of people and bots, and the payment there is very funny, for two projects I received 14 tokens ( taking into account that I wrote articles) it is very funny. as many of his projects were scams. it was strange that he leads such suspicious companies, because even I was clear that this is a project of scams, apparently he specifically leads and was with them in collusion. it is very insulting

[jossiel]

There are even bounty managers themselves who runs the ICO alone that purchased Copper Membership and doesn't have any negative/positive feed back on their accounts.

But their projects are turning to be a scam and you should include that too on your doubt's list.

If you think that the project they are promoting isn't a scam and you wholly believed on it, that's your verdict to follow.

It's better to stay away

The same thinking.

[cabin]

In my own suggestion, I believe there are many reasons to why they got the negative trust and this doesn't mean they are not 100% worthy to be trusted with a bounty campaign, If you read the reason for the negative trust and you find out that it is due to maybe a slight mistake and not because of fraud or mismanagement, you can as well join the campaign he manage because it might be a good one but if the red is due t negative reasons,I think it is better to stay away from the project.

[milewilda]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

Partly Yes and Partly No! If you do have experience on the campaign or projects that they do handle you would able to figure out yourself on how they do manage up things. If they do get red trust either have alt accounts or a wrong thing happen on their handling on the campaign but doesnt mean they are already untrusted generally. In my part im still keen on either joining a project depending on its potential even the manager is on red trust i wont really care or doesnt matter to me unless if the manager do have a very bad reputation when it comes to campaign handling or involve on severe scam or involvement on such ico.

[semobo]

In my own suggestion, I believe there are many reasons to why they got the negative trust and this doesn't mean they are not 100% worthy to be trusted with a bounty campaign, If you read the reason for the negative trust and you find out that it is due to maybe a slight mistake and not because of fraud or mismanagement, you can as well join the campaign he manage because it might be a good one but if the red is due t negative reasons,I think it is better to stay away from the project.

Yes the negative trust is give by a signle person's opinion so you can't decide it based on them if you want to decide it to join or not in their further campaign you need to look at the reason for the negative feedback if they have got it for shady behavior or scammed the particpants then we have to stay away or just continue to do as always.

[Honour423]

Bounty managers may be getting desperate and doing things that create negative trust.  I had a few approach me who basically wanted to change me whatever I could afford and would not commit to doing any real work. 

[jamids]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

It depends on the reason why he got negative trust. If you have participated in several campaigns he manage and then you got paid fairly then I would just trust my experience that I would be paid in the bounties I would be participating. If he promotes a scam ICO then that would be another story and I would not get involved in the campaigns managed by that bounty manager. It makes some who have no experience in that manager to back out though when they see the negative trust.

[tweetbit]

Rely on the managers trust feedback to know that your doing the right same thing. Confusing to understand, but can be easily be followed if you only think as a manager yourself. I mean, taking risk in applying or promoting same ICO by a manager with negative feedback is high and I’ll better at far distance, when accusations is matter of fact possible coming soon. The eyes 👀 of the community is hot with those kind of manager, every single mistakes is crucial.

[Bosda]

my experience when enrolling in a bounty campaign a manager is still in a positive state of trust, in a few weeks menjer was a negative belief from a moderator in say bounty fraud ultimately bounty is stopped for a while, and the awaited party menger confirm against the moderator who gave negative belief but the mederator can not provide answers for his actions. now the bounty is still running. many of which appreciate the performance of bounty menger, including me. so be careful choosing bounty but not all bounty menger bounty with negative trust will disrupt its performance. good teamwork determines the bounty is successful or not. thank you and forgive me

[duythan1988]

Hi my friend! 70% of the projects I do are scams. many of which are managed by many famous bounty managers. I think the phishing projects are increasingly sophisticated. They target the famous bounty managers. This makes it easier for them to perform scam behavior. But I still believe a lot of bounty managers work well

[Tatzky]

It cause from their failed previous projects as they run a project that was disbanded and many of the bounty hunter did not received their awards and promised payments, though some receive their token but until today they have a lot of coins that will not be useful in the future because the project was accused as scam-- and many more, that's why they were advice from DT to double check their project---before running it again.

[Sabinas17]

Many managers began to cheat and cheat, I think it is ugly in relation to the participants, many managers in the tables is chaos: a lot of stolen articles and managers do not want to disqualify them

[Maldini07]

for me it does not matter as long as I trust the manager and his led project has good potential. I follow a few bounty that is held by the manager with a predicate of neg trust but because I see his project is good I still continue my work. the most important is whether the project that follows is good or potentially a scam

[EllipticalCurve63]

They never really explain what they do for the money/

[ankit10]

Recently many of good bounty managers or at least the ones that used to be good has gotten neg trust , people like "needmoney" , "hua_hui" , "blockeye" and many others, What do you guys think?
should we participate in their new projects? or they are not good any more to participate?
You think neg trust means every thing is over and they are not trustable any more or not?
Some of them used to be really good but actually i'm not so sure right now , need to know your ideas.
thank you.

Neg trust is not everything which we should trust, it depends on which case that person got negative trust. Always read the reason why that person got neg trust.

For example NeedMoney and his team, most of their bounties are scam project and no customer support too.

It is better to stay away with their campaigns.

Some other bounties manager with neg rating:  aTriz, JamalAzeez, Sk_Ezaz and wapinter.

for me it does not matter as long as I trust the manager and his led project has good potential. I follow a few bounty that is held by the manager with a predicate of neg trust but because I see his project is good I still continue my work. the most important is whether the project that follows is good or potentially a scam

Project is good or not is important but not most important, Why you want to promote that bounty manager who has neg trust by joining his campaigns?