Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors?

[5thFear]

I am with you in that. The blame is put on the bounty hunters for the fall of the price and looking at the statistics the bounty hunters only hold 5% of the project at times. I mean the 5% can't affect the 95%. Can it ? its the 95% that controls the price.

[1715460414]

1715460414

[1715460414]

1715460414

[1715460414]

1715460414

[Ividanik]

Because bounty hunters are only small part of every ICO token holders, normally they get only around 3% of the pool, I believe price dump early stage investors. They have bought tokens in pre-sale phase with big discount and then sell it for profit until tokens get listed in the exchange.

[meanwords]

I think it's both bounty hunters and early investors are dumping their coins as soon as a token or coin got into an exchange. Some people just want quick cash as soon as possible or some are dumping because they know that a lot of people will dump too and reinvest in the lowest price. But I think investors play a huge part in the lose of price of a token more than bounty hunters.

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

I participated in the bounty campaign of a certain project and its been two months after the ICO ended yet this team has still not paid bounty hunters because they think bounty hunters would dump their coins and cause a fall in the coin price. Surprisingly, the coin is still going down even though it is only the investors who hold the coins.

[iTradeChips]

The problem is that there are really no safeguards that has been established to protect the bounty participants. I think that there is always some kind of price manipulation so that once the bounty hunters get their bounties the market has already been manipulated so that the price will go down then the bounty participants will have a choice of selling their coins or tokens cheap or be an investor like them.

[Slash61]

people will still say bounty hunter who dump coin earlier. We cannot deny this fact, it is indeed the case. But if the reward bounty in the key, it turns out that the dump is still happening I think there will be no blame because that does dump is an investor. logically investors holding more than token bounty hunter, possible investors did dump gets bigger.

[soramon]

Yeah i agree with you opinion. The blame will get on bounty hunter but sometimes its true. But i dont understand why it can impact the price for a long time. The reward of bounty hunter less rather than investor with bonus. Smart bounty hunter will never sell his reward cheap.

[ityandsyn]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

       In this situation  that the coins is already listed in the exchange with a better price and the bounty hunters are being paid one to two months after the ICO then by the time that we were going to trade in the exchange , most of the coins have almost zero value , so it's very clear that the investors are the one dumping first their coins .

[canaveralnonie]

I think, its not the investors... those dumpers are bounty hunter and a sort of theft. The investors will not dump the coins specially if they buy it on a high price, they invest to earn not to dump and lose the fight in this market. For example, I don't waste my time to throw my money on ICO and other thing that is related in cryptocurrencies.

[canaveralnonie]

Yeah i agree with you opinion. The blame will get on bounty hunter but sometimes its true. But i dont understand why it can impact the price for a long time. The reward of bounty hunter less rather than investor with bonus. Smart bounty hunter will never sell his reward cheap.

Some bounty dump it because they want a real money, not the specific altcoins reward. They dump it to earn a fast tangible money, so the possible thing to prevent this issue is to pay them bitcoin or real local money. What do you think?

[Correlll]

I think thats the problem of Bounty hunters. At the moment, if the ICO has reached its soft cap, they are going live on exchanges and there is simply no other investors who want to get the tokens at the ICO price. Bounty hunters are dumping, but anyways, nobody buys at the ICO price.

[cryptocurrencyguru]

what bounty hunters and ico investors dump the coin when it is listed initially later the price bounce back when the new developments release

[dearbesz1219]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

It is obvious that early price dump is caused by bounty hunters. Why do you think that ICO investors sell their tokens? If they sell their coins cheaper, they will loose a lot and thats not the strategy of ICO investors  .

[Fu Mei Mei]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

In this situation  that the coins is already listed in the exchange with a better price and the bounty hunters are being paid one to two months after the ICO then by the time that we were going to trade in the exchange , most of the coins have almost zero value , so it's very clear that the investors are the one dumping first their coins .

I agree with you, some ICO provide very large purchase bonuses in private sale and pre sale
so when they are listed in exchange and they sell it under ICO prices in my opinion they are still profitable
but the fact is that some ICO think that those who dump are bounty hunters - so sad

[Betwrong]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

You have a point there. Bounty hunters normally don't have that much, even combined, to affect the market by selling their coins/tokens. Nevertheless, I doubt any project would pay bounty hunters earlier because they want to show their investors, of whom they care the most, that they are privileged in many ways, including the time when they can sell some of their coins/tokens.

[ellehcar]

We cannot clearly say who from these group of people is causing the dump, but one thing I'm sure of, those who want fast money, those are the ones who dump the tokens early. Sometimes, those who are from the team cause the dump. So it's a hasty generalization to speculate who, because there are bounty hunters who believe in the benefit of hodling; same with the investors' group. It's safe to say that those non-believers of the project are the certified dumpers, those who are just after quick profit and don't see the real value of the token in the future. But yeah, it's disheartening for us, hunters, that they are always putting the blame of devaluation on us.

[aggress0r]

First persons to sell and dump coins are those who receive them first it's quite simple.
Bounty hunters receive coins secondly and investors and early investors at first.
So the price dip is mostly connected with investors dumping as they also have much more coins than bountyhunters do.

[Argoo]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

Investors buy new tokens during the ICO with bonuses of 40-50 percent. They have the opportunity to prepare for their sale when tokens first hit the market, and sell them, having up to 200 percent of the profits. When the bounty hunters receive their tokens, then, by that time, the tokens, as a rule, have already dropped in price and it becomes meaningless to sell them. I have already seen this more than once. Therefore, the accusation of bounty hunters that it is they who lead to a decrease in the price of new tokens is unfair. In addition, bounty hunters have only a few percent of all tokens, some of which hold their new tokens in the hope that they will grow in value.

[r_delossa]

It does not bring anything to the ICO investors, when the price drops. They are only losing their funds. But if the bounty hunters are selling their coins below the ICO price, they aren't making loses, they just earning not so much at the end.

[Erzinnum]

I believe that this is bounty hunters, because they are afraid of scamming or price dumping. Usually, dev`s tokens are locked