Whitepaper? Do you really believe 100% in any projects whitepaper?.

[indobitcoin.tk]

the whitepaper is part of it and its very function is to convince investors to join in it. are indeed not entirely whitepaper becomes the main reference point but at least many of the factors that made him important whitepaper. but there are certainly other things to watch out for to analyze such as seen in the team member who is running behind it.

[ElianaMaria]

the whitepaper is part of it and its very function is to convince investors to join in it. are indeed not entirely whitepaper becomes the main reference point but at least many of the factors that made him important whitepaper. but there are certainly other things to watch out for to analyze such as seen in the team member who is running behind it.

What would be the top three-five things you look at?

Whitepaper? Team? Advisors? MVP? Marketing?

[bummm]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

White paper is just a beautiful text. If you really look at things you can understand that this will not protect our investments. White paper is used only for beautiful words about the project.         
         
         

[Tory-Tory]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

White paper can't be a transparent document. White paper is a presentation document that should sell, not explain, here is its purpose. White paper can't be a single tool for good selling, an integrated approach is needed.

[other_side]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

Of course not, it's just a way for you to understand the project, so it's the platform for you to ask the project team, self-verify whether it is future or feasible in the future. Many of the projects are just a cake picture, and you know what the future of the cake picture is like

[paulscathedral]

In the world of crypto-currencies, you can not trust anyone or anything. Including white paper, which is constantly changing something. Very often many projects copy each other's white papers and do not follow the described plan, which is contained there. This is not credible.

[IVEXO]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

Literally project fails when they pay some firm to write up juicy whitepaper to entice and gather volumes for ico
Only to elope and run off with made Etherum or bitcoin  after token sale had ended and exchange listing

It’s not about the whitepaper, there are alot of things  to be figured out about a project

[PROFIT_REVIEW]

The most important thing is to be able to extract the main essence from the white paper of the project. Pay more attention to the technical aspects described in this document, since if everything is in order there, then ICO will most likely be successful.

[victory.lil]

Of course not. Do you think that many people read white paper? People often just check its availability and this is enough. It seems to me that this business is really necessary and we very often are not right.

[markcruz5554]

Obviously not, you shouldn't really believe anything 100%, especially in crypto. Normally easy to read between the lines though.

[siena23]

Projects with the purpose or have a good whitepaper can fail, I think it's due to several factors, one of which is the team and the project advisor. Who is the team in it? Is ordinary people only. That's what everyone needs to know. Because it is very influential on the project.

[ityandsyn]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

      Plenty of ICO project having a very good platform as we see in the white paper but unfortunately in the long run the project was failed, maybe the team was not able to develop of what is written in the platform, and the other reason is maybe they did not able to reach the soft cap, due to no investors are interested in the project

[clonely]

Crypto money projects are growing day by day. But many projects are unnecessary or SCAM. Moreover, the whitepaper does not tell anything and can accumulate millions of dollars of investment.

[Open4lies]

Of course not. I don't believe in all WP of every ICO project cause I know that there are so many ICO projects have fake WP or they copied WP from another ICO project then just fix some words to make it become their own project WP ). Beside I don't know how many percents of ICO investors care about reading ICO project WP )

[SamboNZ]

They fail because most of them are just lies, to decieve us and to take it as an advantage, but if you can analayze wisely you can determine the real ones to the fake ones. If the whitepaper is too good to be true, it is just a lie.

[que91]

I don't believe in any WP of any project. I just care about their token price after being listed on exchange . There are so many ICO projects have very good Whitepaper but their tokens price after being listed on exchange is always lower than ICO price and seem like they don't really care about it and don't have any idea about pumping price of their tokens . Don't believe in WP cause they can easily pay hundreds dollars to rent a professional writer to create a WP for their project

[Smitt]

Because the ICO is currently a lot of platforms similar to other projects, that's where the project may fail. and to choose a good ICO I not only see from whitepaper but see from the team, developers and what products they will offer.

[Dancing_Lion]

In General, white paper is the main document about the project, which can be trusted. I don't think that's enough for investment. In General, for me the main indicator is the trust of other crypto investors

[jwelkem]

Have truly been reasoning this for an a long time now, those whitepaper of any tasks truly reveals to us what the venture about. Are they sufficiently straightforward to have each task objectives in the whitepaper. A loads of undertakings are out there with decent whitepaper yet they in the end fizzled. Why, what causes the disappointment?

[senin]

Have really been thinking this for a quite a while now, those whitepaper of any projects really tells us what the project all about. Are they transparent enough to have every project goals in the whitepaper. A lots of projects are out there with nice whitepaper but they eventually failed.  How come, what causes the failure?

Of course not. Now many ICO projects copy text from other projects. If you read this text, there is only a set of general phrases and common intentions and little that is concrete. Therefore, if we read such non-specific documents, this is just a testimony that the project is fraudulent or at least poorly prepared.
However, among such projects, sometimes there are good projects with fresh ideas, but one needs to look for a long time.