Hughes_Ryan
Member
 Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 10
|
 |
July 12, 2018, 07:36:21 PM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
I never cared about the website rating and ICO rating. Most analysts and evaluators of these websites are often unprofessional and do not analyse ICO projects well. they are a just fundamental analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pet240
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 486
Merit: 3
|
|
July 12, 2018, 09:35:32 PM |
|
Most ICO ratings are just money making ventures. The rate based on the amount paid to them, because most if their ratings do not reflect the true value of those projects. Imagine projects rated high, yet they fail or end up being scam.
|
|
|
|
|
adzino
Copper Member
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 574
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
|
July 12, 2018, 09:53:20 PM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
What rating system are you talking about? You will see tons of articles online which promoted scam ICOs. One thing you will notice that, most of the ICOs have almost the same "positive" review. This is because the ratings and reviews you find are actually for the paid for. They ICO developers pay them to write a review about their project and naturally the bloggers write positive review with a hope of getting paid extra. So i would say the ICO ratings are actually very unreliable. |
|
|
|
|
jacafbiz
|
|
July 12, 2018, 10:05:01 PM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
With all the allegations against some of these ICO-rating site, I would advise you to do your own research and take their rating as light weight. Most of these rating website and giving their ratings to the highest bidder, even some of these do rate scam projects very high. I don't want to be naming names |
| .SUGAR. | |
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | | |
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | ███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████ ██████
██████ ▄████▀ ██████
██████▄▄▄███▀ ▄█ ██████
██████████▀ ▄███ ██████
████████▀ ▄█████▄▄▄██████
██████▀ ▄███████▀▀▀██████
██████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████
██████ ██████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████ | .
Backed By
ZetaChain | |
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | |
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | |
|
|
|
|
batang_bitcoin
|
|
July 12, 2018, 10:09:35 PM |
|
Majority of them are paid so expect that each ICOs they are rating will receive a very good review.
The rating is fine if the price is right.
So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.
Do you think it is possible to make this market transparent and opened for a single standing investor? If you do understand what crypto's are, for being anonymous and decentralized don't expect for transparency. Although this is open for every single investor that wants to start investing and make his way to stock more crypto's on his portfolio's. Most ICO ratings are just money making ventures.
Can't disagree on you, they are one of the most hype way of making money nowadays if you own a rating site and list ICOs for free and offer them for a nice review to get paid. |
▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████████▄
| ███████████████████▄████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄████████████▄
██▄███████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
█████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀ | | | .
| | ▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀███████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀ | .
ElonCoin.org | │ | | .
| │ | ████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▀░▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
██████████████▄██████▌
█████▐██▄██████▄████▐
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀█████▄▄ | .
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"
▬▬▬▬▬ |
|
|
|
|
askmecrypto
|
|
July 12, 2018, 10:15:35 PM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
If you are talking about the rating websites which we see like everyone getting a 4+ rating these days, I find them utter useless. Being in bitcointalk, we all know about bounties and content creation, over the time, we have seen special bounties, which includes such rating website to review there ICO with high stars. These rating websites just get good bounty payouts for rating the ICOs high on there platform, and hence there is no possible way to trust there scores anymore. Talking about experts like Ian shillina and others, they just use there influencing power in the projects to which they are linked to. I personally dont target any of them, but a lot of shill just make a shitty ICO well funded. Doing research on ICO is an individual task before investing it IN. Look out for the partners, read out whitepaper, check the genuineness of partners and advisors if they are really linked to the project. Its not really a wise decision to invest somewhere looking by just the rating systems. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ahooleeman (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:32:05 AM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
If you are talking about the rating websites which we see like everyone getting a 4+ rating these days, I find them utter useless. Being in bitcointalk, we all know about bounties and content creation, over the time, we have seen special bounties, which includes such rating website to review there ICO with high stars. These rating websites just get good bounty payouts for rating the ICOs high on there platform, and hence there is no possible way to trust there scores anymore. Talking about experts like Ian shillina and others, they just use there influencing power in the projects to which they are linked to. I personally dont target any of them, but a lot of shill just make a shitty ICO well funded. Doing research on ICO is an individual task before investing it IN. Look out for the partners, read out whitepaper, check the genuineness of partners and advisors if they are really linked to the project. Its not really a wise decision to invest somewhere looking by just the rating systems. What if there will appear a platform where anyone from the community can rate? And in the same time when rating this person will be rated as well to avoid corrupted ratings..? |
|
|
|
|
Ahooleeman (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:32:46 AM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
With all the allegations against some of these ICO-rating site, I would advise you to do your own research and take their rating as light weight. Most of these rating website and giving their ratings to the highest bidder, even some of these do rate scam projects very high. I don't want to be naming names We all very well know all these names) |
|
|
|
cepot9
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 102
Cryptocurrency addict | Invest at your own risk.
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:36:19 AM |
|
now a lot of sites that discuss and give rating to ICO but many of them give less accurate rating in my opinion because I compare ico which have high rating lost success with ico which have medium or low rating, all can happen but better ico rating only for evaluation and reference only and the final choice to yourself
|
|
|
|
|
iconoclast
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 770
Merit: 102
Matrix Built On An Ethereum Smart Contract
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:39:12 AM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
They are a complete waste of time and should not be relied upon. They do not do proper due diligence and often only repeat the information the company has released without confirming its authenticity. Some have been caught asking for money in return for positive reviews. You should not rely on them instead of doing your own due diligence before investing. |
|
|
|
Sylvial
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 2
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:43:16 AM |
|
Ratings as we have learnt are now influenced. These project owners pay the rating sites to put out a favorable review out the space. This informs why a lot of these projects don't stand the test of time when they hit the exchange because their use cases are so vague. That being said, there are some ratings that are honest and unbiased.
|
|
|
|
|
omitusaf
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 102
Revolutionising Marketing and Loyalty
|
|
July 13, 2018, 08:57:27 AM |
|
I use them as guides to see the details of the ICO and team members at a glance. I don't trust their scores though. For some very good sites, I can also check the categories of ICOs.
|
|
|
|
|
bagikoin
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:07:44 AM |
|
I don't really pay attention to it. Sometimes that kind of rating ICO just gives the trick away. better analyze himself with certainty and accordingly what is. It would be much more promising than relying on an assessment rating of ICO. many have bad ICO rating and it's not a guarantee of the ICO will not be able to be a great success and could even reach hard cap.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahooleeman (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:12:59 AM |
|
now a lot of sites that discuss and give rating to ICO but many of them give less accurate rating in my opinion because I compare ico which have high rating lost success with ico which have medium or low rating, all can happen but better ico rating only for evaluation and reference only and the final choice to yourself
Don't you think besides all hype projects there are some that could be interesting but due to the lack of feedback from community they do not improve their leaks and do not succeed? |
|
|
|
|
nelson4lov
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:13:58 AM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
The metrics for rating projects is bad. very bad in fact. Gone are the days when the so called experts rate project based on the project's proposition. These days, It's all about "Hey, There's hype, I would invest". That's how crappy and low quality projects gets hyped and shilled while the good ones are poorly funded.. It's all about the hype now. Experts has turned paid shillers and ICO rating sites takes cash (or should I say bribe?) to keep low quality ICOs on their first pages. It's gets worse everyday. |
|
|
|
arthur305
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:16:21 AM |
|
I really do not follow their ratings because I feel they can be biased some times. I usually make use of icodrops and some youtubers rating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahooleeman (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:18:01 AM |
|
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
The metrics for rating projects is bad. very bad in fact. Gone are the days when the so called experts rate project based on the project's proposition. These days, It's all about "Hey, There's hype, I would invest". That's how crappy and low quality projects gets hyped and shilled while the good ones are poorly funded.. It's all about the hype now. Experts has turned paid shillers and ICO rating sites takes cash (or should I say bribe?) to keep low quality ICOs on their first pages. It's gets worse everyday. What will you do to change it if you can? (just ideas) |
|
|
|
anotherpriest
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:27:30 AM |
|
There are so many ICO rating systems but not all of them are good. I only believe in ICObench cause IMO, I think it's the most truthworthy system although I know that ICObench also received money to promote for ICO project  . Of course ICO rating systems affect a lot to ICO project cause investors always focus on ICO projects which have highest rate only . ICOBench experts want money to give a high rating for projects, it's scam. |
|
|
|
|
luongdk
|
|
July 13, 2018, 09:32:30 AM |
|
I would not say that ico itself experiences bad times. There are many projects, and they collect enough, much more than they need to implement these projects in fact. And the fact that tokens fall into the abyss immediately, this is another matter. In the mid-term, they will strongly affect ico, but now things are going pretty well for ico.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ahooleeman (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2018, 10:37:54 AM |
|
I would not say that ico itself experiences bad times. There are many projects, and they collect enough, much more than they need to implement these projects in fact. And the fact that tokens fall into the abyss immediately, this is another matter. In the mid-term, they will strongly affect ico, but now things are going pretty well for ico.
The topic is not about "how ICO's are doing". Please read first before writing. |
|
|
|
|
