|
February 16, 2014, 02:59:13 PM |
|
I'm extremely sceptical that it's worth relying on these numbers when there are so many huge factors dominating bitcoin today.
For example, so much of bitcoin's volume, press and mind-share is tied up in the MtGox vortex of failure. MtGox does something newsworthy (in any respect) and the price skews wildly. At best the only people who can predict that are MtGox.
Next up you've got the protocol itself. The statistical methods you're using might work for fiat markets which are most of the time fairly rational. It's extremely rare that any problem is discovered in the "protocol" of fiat. But it's inevitable that there will be further bugs found in bitcoin, or further issues which were thought trivial yet become of major concern when an Internet full of trolls is added to the mix.
So, I'm glad you posted this as it was an interesting read, but I do think that everyone needs to stop short of the "therefore, you should do this…" point. Because honestly I don't think anyone can be particularly confident!
|