That is correct. There is still a plan to switch to POS or POA or Any other proof after POW 2.0 `Tron`.
We will open up all sorts of possibilities. But the principle of all of these possibilities is `the benefit of existing ELE Holders` and `the stability and performance of SmartContract`.
The POW 2.0 Tron will be released in a few days. Thank you, Sir.
is it possible to get PoS ahead of Ethereum?
The POW approach poses a problem in that the overall network hash performance can not be used to proof the contract. Because a hash performance that has not been successfully mined can be considered an abandoned resource. If you only use it for currency purposes, you do not have to consider these issues, but it is a clear consideration if you consider the efficiency and performance of the contract.
So, Elementrem will definitely use other proofs other than POW, and it is quite difficult to switch to pure POS ahead of Ethereum. Dagger-hashimoto is a difficult problem to do. And it is much more stable to apply Ethereum Code Base.
But Its validity has not yet been tested. As I mentioned earlier, the fundamental principle of Elementrem's choice of POW / POS / POS / POS any other proof is `the benefits of existing ELE Holders` and` the stability and performance of SmartContract`.
In case of 'the stability and performance of SmartContract`, it is recommended to apply Ethereum Code Base.
However, the situation is different for `the benefit of existing ELE Holders`. Apart from Ethereum Code Base, Uncle fee can be paid to miners who have more than a certain percentage of ELE. Furthermore, this method does not affect SmartContract. As such, Elementrem can provide the benefits of POS by using Uncle reward in a variety of ways, but it is not POS exactly. But debate over whether to apply this is premature. I'm sorry I couldn't provide what you needed Sir.