Token listing

[zero714309]

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

[1715257080]

1715257080

[vanjava]

I prefer token list from exchanger and from distribution token, because if the exchanger is clear the token will definitely be distributed especially if the token listing in the popular exchanger.

[badakjawa]

Distribution of tokens and then listing on the exchange it is a good start. Why not the other way around? If the token has been listing in exchange before distribution, it will happen price dumper caused by the hunter.

[carter34]

I observe that the tradition has been to distribute token before listing in an exchange. I'm thinking that the reason for that is to settle off the supporters of the project on time because most times, it takes a whole lot of time for tokens to be listed maybe because of financial constrain , and so, keeping participants also waiting that long might lead to bumping the thread unneccessily and hate comments.

But, I think any one that comes first shouldn't really matter if the management is sincere.

[MachNotMark]

depends on the project, many projects are really hard to get listed and some are listed even before the tokensale ended.

[aervin11]

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

Different actions with different benefits for each individual who are supporting the project. In my opinion, it's better to distribute the tokens first before the listing, why? simply because who would sell if there is nobody who got/hold the tokens? how could it circulate? the team would sell it on exchanges first after they conduct an ICO? Very no no.

[oceantiger]

To me listing a token in an exchange before distributing  is better. This will show seriousness on the part the developers and also give  sense of belonging to the investors and the promoters. Both the investors and promoters will be assured of reaping from their effort immediately distribution happens.

[CryptoTamer]

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

I think it's better listed on the exchange and then distribute tokens because it could close the possibility for early investors who get bigger discounts to take short-term profits by dump their tokens on an unofficial exchange.

Example; You can see some Tokens on Decentralized Exchanges, which use contract address as URL to their market

[lobo13hf]

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

Distribute all of the token and then listing your token in exchange site., it's much better in my opinion consider you can try to make sure there was no investor that missing to get the token.
It will create a good situation for your token. If those investors have been getting when they deserve and then you can start your application to the exchange site and ask them to help you to vote your token.

[hot_ads]

I think the token unlocking should take place at the same time as the official launch of the exchange. If the token is unlocked in advance, it is easy for the encryption price to be lower than the offer price.

[vasil777]

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

I think it's better to distribute token before listing in exchanger! So everyone who has the coins will be in the same conditions. Maybe I think foolishly, but it seems to me that it will be correct.

[mairespleet]

According to me at first the token needs to be listed and then it should go for distribution. After listing, the token will be able to get the confidence of the investors and listing will also help to have more efficient distribution.

[SladderyNewS]

Depends on how promising or popular the project is, some get listed in no time whereas others take time to get into the list. In my opinion, listing a token in an exchange before distributing is the right way to do it.

[CrazyBTC7800]

Distributing tokens and listing after distribution might be the better option but sometimes it depends on the project designed. Some projects are designed with listed before ecosale. Actually, it's the management's planning for their business.

[Brequir]

Solely depends on the nature of the project, some are hard to get listed whereas others are not. In my opinion, listing a token in an exchange before distributing should be the way.

[BITcoinJuniorMB]

In my opinion it may vary time to time. But, I think it is better to distributre the token before exchanging.

[Seriousbizz]

It's been a normal thing for a token to first be listed in an exchange, before getting distributed. Almost becoming a tradition. I don't see anything wrong with it though, and since this has been working for them for a while now, why not go ahead with it?

[@baoli]

When you say exchange it depends, if its cex or ddex . some ICO distribute to their investors so they can generate volume on ddex before going to cex. But better still if they on their own can list on cex exchange and distribute token. Investors can know how serious the project is.

[the13thsymphony]

Distribution of tokens and then listing on the exchange it is a good start. Why not the other way around? If the token has been listing in exchange before distribution, it will happen price dumper caused by the hunter.

The price dump is never caused by bounty hunters, it will be caused by the whales and pump and dump groups that have joined the ICO as they would have majority of the token distribution. But I agree with you as it can be dumped quickly by such manipulators it is a good way to start to distribute the tokens first then list the token in the exchange.

[HeartDesire888]

The projects or tokens which has good advantages and future benefits should get the highest priority. Token listing would be great for the investors to judge.