WHAT do you THINK about the INDIAN ICO

[Tahir460pk]

It's possible from india because their are many people's who love with the crypto and they have alot of skills so you can say it but i am not a expert and they main factors for this can only explain experts of this market.

[RuAGA]

It's possible from india because their are many people's who love with the crypto and they have alot of skills so you can say it but i am not a expert and they main factors for this can only explain experts of this market.

I'm also not an expert so far, that's why I created this topic so that more experienced forum members would share their opinions and give possible instructions to us more young 

[krassy]

There is a bad experience of participation in the Indian ICO, although the project was attractive and promising and token payments were made on time, but after the end of the ICO faded and disappeared,no communication channel works. So nothing good to say yet.

[RuAGA]

There is a bad experience of participation in the Indian ICO, although the project was attractive and promising and token payments were made on time, but after the end of the ICO faded and disappeared,no communication channel works. So nothing good to say yet.

Yes, I have absolutely the same situation! The truth is not in one, but in as many as 2 out of 3 companies a sad end! the main thing is that the ideas are very interesting and could be on the market and prosper well, but no! something they do not have!

[SuiMikira]

Indian ICO seems to only look at money they collect from token sale, they don't want to start a project with long term products development. All projects become quiet and almost dead after ICO, no more development, announcement. Twitter and Facebook channels become inactive while Telegram become place for spammers. That's why they never reach their token sale cap.

[Dewar Noise]

if indeed like now it should be more careful if participating in an ICO from the country, it is possible that the ICO development team from the country lacks sufficient knowledge and experience in the crypto world or the projects they make are not so attractive that not many invest in the ico.

[TranPi16]

To tell the truth, I do not like India's projects. I have participated in 2 of their Bounty projects but I gave up, the support speed is too bad, I feel they are scam. However, there are many people involved in such projects.

[marufnang]

I think there is a same chance for a project that came from any country to be good or bad.
Those aren't defined based on where the project came from. What makes a project good is their concept, the team , support from the community and many other aspect

[Callanta787]

In crypto world no country or race is left out, crypto is for everybody,don't underestimate Indians ,few ones I've seen are talented ,they are good with software encoding and blockchains too,india is one of the countries that fully accept cryptocurrency, do research on the project and make up your mind ,I invested in stellite coin which the dev is from india .

[Nikolas_the_Wonderworker]

India is the second most populous country in the world. This means that the prospects for the development of cryptography in India will affect the development of the crypto industry as a whole in the world. Indian ICO is also very important and will undoubtedly develop and be successful.

[kritiana008]

All ICOs are good if fthey are not scam. India is very pretty in recognizing and spreading crypto and I think that they have a good predictions if this trend will be continued. What is more, I suppose that the amount of scam is mucl lower there than we have on the another part of market.

[lebedi]

From my point of view they have more promising potential because their have larger place for the future development in this sphere and they are more clear what it so important too.

[Hammonds]

Maybe what you mean is a development team from India, right?
If they don't request softcap then their project is the same as the others.
So it's not interesting to see investors.