This is too bad to hear, and at this stage where most gambling website are looking for good reputation some others are destroying the one they have earn already, I don't know what the case may be but betking have to come out to clear the air so that they can build confidence in the heart of new users.
As posted in another thread, they cannot come here and clear the air because when they lie they get exposed.
A problem here with regards to betking not having clarity is because serial scammer Dean Nolan and his side-kicks are promoting a distinction between "groups" in the hope to create confusion.
Group 1 consists of those those affected by betking in any negative way:- ICO investors
- later purchasers of BKB tokens
- current disillusioned holders of BKB tokens or BKT tokens
- bounty participants
- those who had their software stolen by betking and used without consent and used without paying licence fees
- those invited to invest in post-ICO betking when it nearly shutdown as it was failing but were lied to and told it was doing exceptionally well and was a great investment
- previous players who won contests but were scammed by betking and not given their winnings
- previous affiliates who helped promote the website but were scammed by betking
Group 2 consists of:-current players who bet at betking who might have little, a lot or no information about its shady past
It is normal for those in Group 2 (current gamblers at betking) to pop in and out of betking related threads saying they were able to deposit and withdraw funds with ease. Maybe they had a good game play experience, maybe they have positive comments to post. Some accounts here are no doubt operated by serial scammer Dean Nolan and side-kicks but they can easily be spotted.
As for the Group 1, they have their own reasons for being disillusioned with betking and lay the blame squarely at serial scammer Dean Nolan.
The purpose of the ICO was to make serial scammer Dean Nolan rich at any cost to investors. When he wanted more money for himself after he scammed investors he failed to sell betking and failed to raise funds to launch his "bitsafe" exchange scam, therefore he switched over to EOS tokens trying to airdrop freebies to new users in the hope to drag in 200,000 new users but there are hardly 15-20 users logged in to that site at any time with another 5-10 non-users just on there looking around before exiting.
About those EOS tokens he made sure he was going to make even more money for free from thin-air: "
Reserved for Team: 1,000,000,000"
What exactly did serial scammer Dean Nolan do that deserved and warranted him getting 1 billion of the of the 10 billion BKT EOS tokens?
Why on earth did he receive 10% of all BKT out there after he destroyed the reputation betking once built-up?
He decided to unilaterally give himself 10% of all BKT tokens on the EOS platform AFTER he made millions from the 30 million BKB tokens that were in his control that were not for public sale in the 2017 ICO.
Of those 70 million BKB tokens he sold, 50% were supposed to go directly to the bankroll - that was over 1046 BTC, over 4619 ETH and over 856 LTC. The remaining 50% were supposed to be used to help the site with "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal" but much of those funds were also siphoned-off and diverted to serial scammer Dean Nolan because he never allowed any audit of expenditure to any investor or non-investor. 50% of funds raised did not go to fund the bankroll and the other 50% were not used for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal". Where did they go?
Serial scammer Dean Nolan claims he used the bankroll funds to buy back BKB tokens when nobody in their right mind would do that.
Why use the bankroll funds to buy back tokens? Well it was because he could not use the remaining 50% funds which were allegedly to be used for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal" because much of them were being siphoned-off and being diverted to serial scammer Dean Nolan therefore the only way he could do it was to use the bankroll funds which any competent business person would tell you that was the worst thing to do but he did it because he did not want to use the funds for "marketing, promotions, SEO, design development, server costs and legal" as it would hit his personal milking-machine.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan who made himself filthy-rich thanks to the millions that poured in from the 2017 betking ICO then went on to ensure he would have staggering 1 billion BKT EOS tokens for himself. There is no "team", it is just him and he hires low cost coders to make modifications for him since he could not code a single piece of code even if he tried.
When its owner and operator serial scammer Dean Nolan tries to show people that betking is a clean business without a shady past, he is not only lying by denying the wrongs of the past but also is presenting more lies in the face of a new narrative he presents to those unaware of the past.
