practicaldreamer (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:37:20 PM |
|
Might be a naive question for some - but why is anonymity such a priority for BTC ? Why is Amir concentrating on it with Dark Wallet ? How will the anonymity of transactions benefit the average Jo (who probably won't have 2 bits to scratch his arse with anyway) ? I can see how it would be of benefit to the wealthy and their respective tax liabilities ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Is it a security issue ? Or is it ideological ? It just seems to me that the main benefactors of BTC transaction anonymity would be the privileged class/wealthy/elite etc. I don't ask the question to make a rhetorical point - I'm guessing the likes of Amir must have a good reason for it - I'm just not sure I understand that reason at this point
|
|
|
|
Raya
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:39:47 PM |
|
Bitcoin is not as anoymous as people think just take a look at the scam accusations and how many people get caight almost 90%.
|
|
|
|
Cryptopher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:43:53 PM |
|
I wouldn't say that it is anonymous, but rather the connection between a Bitcoin address and a person is weaker.
For a bank account you need to provide identification and address details, whereas you can just create a new Bitcoin address ad-hoc. You have ownership of that account.
But with the Bitcoin address, it is simply a reference point that you choose to use, maybe for a few minutes, maybe for months. But it would take a lot to pin an actual person to that particular address, even if they post it with their forum handle etc.
I would describe Bitcoin as being much more lightweight than services like PayPal or banks, much more like digital cash transactions.
|
Sign up to Revolut and do the Crypto Quiz to earn $15/£14 in DOT
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:46:41 PM |
|
Might be a naive question for some - but why is anonymity such a priority for BTC ? Why is Amir concentrating on it with Dark Wallet ? How will the anonymity of transactions benefit the average Jo (who probably won't have 2 bits to scratch his arse with anyway) ? I can see how it would be of benefit to the wealthy and their respective tax liabilities ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Because some people value anonymity and privacy, and various governments are trying to spy on everything we do, and to some people they don't want governments to know every detail of their lives or what they might spend their money on.
|
|
|
|
keithers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:48:33 PM |
|
IMO it is not the anonymity of each specific transaction that matters. It is more so important that the government doesn't have eyes on, or can at the click of a button seize all your liquid assets. Anonymity is important to protect your net worth.
|
|
|
|
Cryptopher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:50:36 PM |
|
Might be a naive question for some - but why is anonymity such a priority for BTC ? Why is Amir concentrating on it with Dark Wallet ? How will the anonymity of transactions benefit the average Jo (who probably won't have 2 bits to scratch his arse with anyway) ? I can see how it would be of benefit to the wealthy and their respective tax liabilities ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Because some people value anonymity and privacy, and various governments are trying to spy on everything we do, and to some people they don't want governments to know every detail of their lives or what they might spend their money on. Of course, in order to preserve anonymity then the user needs to play by certain rules. The problem is what if they are being spied on during their Bitcoin transactions? That probably isn't a concern for the average Joe, but more for the likes of people who are already on a spy list lol.
|
Sign up to Revolut and do the Crypto Quiz to earn $15/£14 in DOT
|
|
|
corebob
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:51:28 PM |
|
It provides neutrality for everyone whether you are wealthy or not, and it provides protection from oppressive governments.
With the combination of decentralization and anonymity, a true democracy is suddenly within reach.
|
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:57:22 PM |
|
Some people in the world do not have the luxury of rights and freedom. For them circumventing the systems that would persecute them is moral, in my opinion. What if you are a Syrian fighting the government? Even us in the U.S.A. face attempts to stop us from donating to wikileaks or Edward Snowden. Anonymity must be preserved as a balance against tyranny.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4340
Merit: 4682
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:59:25 PM |
|
the answer to bitcoins anonimity is the same question people ask about governments trying to remove bank notes, where everyone is forced to use debit cards.
do you really want your bank selling your personal information to businesses do you really want to have your wife finding out about that expensive gift you bought your mistress do you want banks to inform the tax man of that $£100 your gran sent you as a birthday gift, where they would bite £$20+ out of it do you really want you bank manager knowing you frequent casino's when you try to apply for a loan and be told that your a financial risk do you really want to have no privacy?
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
s_s
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 08:59:43 PM |
|
There are some other legitimate reasons for the need for some degrees of privacy associated with bitcoin transactions that no one else has mentioned.
For example for companies to protect certain trade information that they are not required otherwise to make public and might be an advantage to competitors...or for example to prevent employees from being able to deduce what other coworker salaries are etc.
In many ways the blockchain actually can be "more" revealing with respect to transactions of some people than the way things are done now.
|
|
|
|
|
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:14:17 PM |
|
What happened to that zerocoin or whatever it was that they were meant to be developing on top of the blockchain or something?
|
|
|
|
s_s
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:17:23 PM |
|
What happened to that zerocoin or whatever it was that they were meant to be developing on top of the blockchain or something? It is being developed as an independent stand alone crypto separate from bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:20:02 PM |
|
Zerocoin from what I have read is still theoretical and the math behind it has not been tested for loopholes yet. There are issues with the block chain bloating as well. So it is a long way away from a fully functional crypto. What happened to that zerocoin or whatever it was that they were meant to be developing on top of the blockchain or something?
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:21:16 PM |
|
Fungibility. Good money needs to be fungible or the whole system of that money is inefficient as a medium of exchange and will inevitably break down.
It is not about anonymity per se but traceability. In the realm of digital money it must be untraceable to be fungible. Any piece of bitcoin must be indistinguishable from any other piece of bitcoin.
Anonymity can be a natural side-effect of untraceable digital money but is not necessarily a goal in itself.
|
|
|
|
MakeBelieve
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:23:08 PM |
|
Bitcoin is not as anoymous as people think just take a look at the scam accusations and how many people get caight almost 90%.
It is anoymous if the right guidelines are followed and most people follow them pretty good and I would say that the scam accusation area is normally filled with newbies or don't value annoymity and just want to scam coin quickly luckily they do that and we can find out who they are.
|
On a mission to make Bitcointalk.org Marketplace a safer place to Buy/Sell/Trade
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:25:38 PM |
|
Bitcoin is not as anoymous as people think just take a look at the scam accusations and how many people get caight almost 90%.
It is anoymous if the right guidelines are followed and most people follow them pretty good and I would say that the scam accusation area is normally filled with newbies or don't value annoymity and just want to scam coin quickly luckily they do that and we can find out who they are. That's because they stupidly tie themselves to their identity in some way. If you want to remain anonymous you can do.
|
|
|
|
leopard2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:46:46 PM |
|
no idea why people want to own something anonymously, with governments all over the world being more trustworthy than ever, like this http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-16/money-launderer-until-proven-innocent-italy-imposes-20-tax-withholding-all-inbound-msome say anonymity is for criminals, others say it is a protection from criminals, it is a matter of definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102bank vaults were opened by IRS agents and the gold stolen, excuse me, upgraded to paper - what a coincidence that anonymous gold purchases are not allowed anymore in the US, and sure enough, anonymous BTC are considered money laundering. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) back then the gold was needed to finance the attack against Germany, today there is much more that needs financing.
|
Truth is the new hatespeech.
|
|
|
practicaldreamer (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 09:58:31 PM |
|
There are many reason to have an anonymous blockchain. Think Wikileaks, ....., Whistle blowers, Investigative Journalism etc...
Yes - I can see the benefit there. Fungibility. Good money needs to be fungible or the whole system of that money is inefficient as a medium of exchange and will inevitably break down.
It is not about anonymity per se but traceability. In the realm of digital money it must be untraceable to be fungible. Any piece of bitcoin must be indistinguishable from any other piece of bitcoin.
Anonymity can be a natural side-effect of untraceable digital money but is not necessarily a goal in itself.
The idea being that if I (Practical Dreamer) deposit 2 BTC to Wikileaks, and its traceable back to me - then those 2 BTC then become worth a different amount (less) on the open market than they would if they had been 2 BTC transferred from the Queen of England to Barack Obama ?? How does that work ? I can understand the idea of it being desirable for the BTC transaction to be untraceable (for our idealist purposes lets say a donation to Wikileaks) - but why would it make those 2 BTC any less fungible in the event of that transaction being transparent/traceable/not anonymous ? Why would they be worth any more or less ? In other words, wouldn't BTC still be fungible without anonymity ?
|
|
|
|
pening
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 19, 2014, 10:01:37 PM |
|
I always find the obsession from some quarters over anonymity odd. You know whats anonymous? Cash. People have been evading authorities by using cash for as long as its been around. You know whats not anonymous? Electronic transfer, especially if the parties are not physically present. That electronic transfer leaves finger prints and trails all over the place, while having something shipped mean giving out your name and address. In person trade with a paper wallet is best chance of anonymous transaction, if you generated the address offline.
|
|
|
|
|