FORTUNEJACK DONT PLAY

[Kiritsugu]

Just want to throw out there that a 2-3x wagering requirement on deposits (purely deposited funds, NOT any bonuses) is pretty common for sites like FortuneJack (I know BitStarz does the same thing as well).  When I asked BitStarz about it, they said it was to prevent/mitigate people from just using their site as a money laundering service.  In other words, they don't want people to deposit only to make 1-2 rolls/bets and withdraw in order to use their site as a means of attempting to obfuscate coins that were used for illegal services, stolen, etc..

I haven't played on FJ in quite a while, but when I did (~2+ years ago for a 1-2 year period), I never had any issues with them.

[NightSabre]

A x2 rollover requirement is actually pretty good from what i've seen. Is this the lowest around at the moment?

[milewilda]

Just want to throw out there that a 2-3x wagering requirement on deposits (purely deposited funds, NOT any bonuses) is pretty common for sites like FortuneJack (I know BitStarz does the same thing as well).  When I asked BitStarz about it, they said it was to prevent/mitigate people from just using their site as a money laundering service.  In other words, they don't want people to deposit only to make 1-2 rolls/bets and withdraw in order to use their site as a means of attempting to obfuscate coins that were used for illegal services, stolen, etc..

I haven't played on FJ in quite a while, but when I did (~2+ years ago for a 1-2 year period), I never had any issues with them.

People do really miss out these informations about wagering requirement and they do only complain when they do already experiencing such problem. Not only Fortunejack do have these terms but all of gambling sites as well due to the same reason. They dont really like for them to be used up as a possible medium for those depositors who just deposit and take out the money for sole purpose either for just mixing up the coins or to launder money,as simple as that.

[Hhampuz]

Anyone entertaining this thread with anything other than a quote from or a link to the terms of FortuneJack are basically just spamming, probably for their sig campaign. Stop.

[BTCevo]

First thing, OP may be misunderstanding about their rollover terms here. Usually site that need us to complete their rollover is because players use their bonuses which mean in the end only less players that will be complete it. But on FJ, they do have that 2 rollovers, one is from their bonus and second one is the first deposit account, because they care that their site will be used as medium for mixing address like milewilda said. The reason is because they do not let player use any fee to withdraw, so you should know it by now

I believe it is not that hard to make a 2x rollover, and this is not a big issue. How much do you win actually, and why you can't even complete the wagering?

[habijabi]

 

FORTUNEJACK mostely Fucking website.... I know

[coingamblingreviews]

Just want to throw out there that a 2-3x wagering requirement on deposits (purely deposited funds, NOT any bonuses) is pretty common for sites like FortuneJack (I know BitStarz does the same thing as well).  When I asked BitStarz about it, they said it was to prevent/mitigate people from just using their site as a money laundering service.  In other words, they don't want people to deposit only to make 1-2 rolls/bets and withdraw in order to use their site as a means of attempting to obfuscate coins that were used for illegal services, stolen, etc..

I haven't played on FJ in quite a while, but when I did (~2+ years ago for a 1-2 year period), I never had any issues with them.

yeah I have never had problems using FJ and I have been on there for the last few years.