Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 06:12:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: SC's supernode system variant  (Read 1179 times)
JohnDoe (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 12, 2011, 09:17:13 PM
Last edit: October 13, 2011, 03:53:23 PM by JohnDoe
 #1

By now it's clear that the majority of people reject the idea that wealth is proportional to the trustworthiness of a node, so how about this: instead of directly giving supernode status to wealthiest people we vote for supernodes (which may not necessarily be wealthy) with our money, in the ratio of 1 coin = 1 vote. This way poorer people can band together and surpass the voting power of the rich ones to elect a supernode of their choosing. It also allows the rich to relinquish their supernode power and give it to a more trusted member of the network. Voting would be done with a special transaction which basically says that any money held by the sending address is a vote for node X.  

Would this work better?

For reference, here is the original system: http://solidcoin.info/solidcoin-most-secure-currency.php
1715580742
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715580742

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715580742
Reply with quote  #2

1715580742
Report to moderator
1715580742
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715580742

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715580742
Reply with quote  #2

1715580742
Report to moderator
1715580742
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715580742

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715580742
Reply with quote  #2

1715580742
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715580742
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715580742

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715580742
Reply with quote  #2

1715580742
Report to moderator
1715580742
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715580742

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715580742
Reply with quote  #2

1715580742
Report to moderator
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2011, 09:21:20 PM
 #2

Voting is probably preferable to a dictatorship. However youre not accounting for the future when supernodes will be distributed and competing ?

coblee
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1654
Merit: 1286


Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 09:48:29 PM
 #3

I like the concept of voting, but it seems like it wil bloat the blockchain.

t3a
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2011, 11:38:40 PM
 #4

So now a 51% attack would involve getting 51% of the coins.

Actually if there are multiple contenders, 5% may be all that's needed to win the vote.

Advertise here for 10btc/day
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2011, 11:45:58 PM
 #5

51% votes to take the other 49% coins and theres fuck all you can do about it ?

Democracy is and always will be two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Unless you can come up with a system for voting thats as elegant as bitcoin is for currency you wont get anywhere.



BitterTea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 13, 2011, 02:08:13 PM
 #6

That would only apply if there's only 1 supernode. If the protocol allows a maximum of 100 supernodes then 49% of the coins could elect up to 49 supernodes.

Doesn't that still mean that the others can perform a 51% supernode attack and probabilisticly rewrite the block chain at will?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!