How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world?

[suchmoon]

A person could be shitposting and/or untrustworthy but still quite recognizable if they're hyperactive (e.g. Quickseller #162) and that's fair.

I agree.  I also think if a deck of cards was ever produced with bitcointalk members on their faces, QS should be one of the jokers.  Maybe Spoetnik could be the other, but he abandoned the forum a while ago if I'm not mistaken.

Anyway, the criteria seem reasonable.  There's really no other way to measure forum recognition if you want to do so at least somewhat quantitatively.   One flaw in this is that Satoshi is ranked #40 as I write this.  He probably should get grandfathered in and pegged at #1 or #2 or something.  I get that he hasn't been active in years, but damn.

Maybe something like "mentions" should be a factor, i.e. how many times your name is mentioned in other people's posts. Not easy to implement though.

[Welsh]

I agree.  I also think if a deck of cards was ever produced with bitcointalk members on their faces, QS should be one of the jokers.  Maybe Spoetnik could be the other, but he abandoned the forum a while ago if I'm not mistaken.

Anyway, the criteria seem reasonable.  There's really no other way to measure forum recognition if you want to do so at least somewhat quantitatively.   One flaw in this is that Satoshi is ranked #40 as I write this.  He probably should get grandfathered in and pegged at #1 or #2 or something.  I get that he hasn't been active in years, but damn.

Okay, lets crowdfund this deck of cards idea. Would be interesting.

Yeah, I guess it is based on Bitcointalk though. If it was Bitcoin then sure. But, I guess a lot of people haven't even read Satoshi's posts. I know I have, and a few other people would of read every single one, but I guess he's no longer that impactful in the current Bitcointalk.

Maybe something like "mentions" should be a factor, i.e. how many times your name is mentioned in other people's posts. Not easy to implement though.

Theymos to be #1 closely followed by Lauda, and Vod.

[Jet Cash]

Well if you are creating characters for a card deck, then I am traditionally the Knave ( Page ) of Batons.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Okay, lets crowdfund this deck of cards idea. Would be interesting.

I would love to do this, but I'd be useless for anything but a contribution.  I don't know anything about producing cards or even crowdfunding for that matter, though I can't imagine doing the latter would be all that complicated.  Do you know of anyone who'd be able to design and manufacture playing, tarot, or trading cards?  I've seen a lot of weird bitcoin-related items when I've visited the Collectibles section, so I would think somebody might be able to do it.

This probably needs its own thread.  I just think that it would be an extremely neat thing to have to look back at bitcointalk years from now.  You have to admit that the forum is an important component of the bitcoin world, as Satoshi himself was a founding member and many influential bitcoiners use or have used the site.  Many bitcoin collectibles exist, but I don't think I've ever seen any bitcointalk memorabilia.

[LoyceV]

Do you know of anyone who'd be able to design and manufacture playing, tarot, or trading cards?

Some (Chinese?) webshops can produce this, ArtsCow.com for example charges $13.99 for producing just one set.
The design will have to be a community effort, and no, I can't help with that

[bill gator]

I know a couple of extremely talented artists if we are serious about getting some cards made. The artists I know are not members of the community, so I am unsure if that is a demerit. It might be more wholesome to keep the design and manufacturing within the community, but I am unsure how feasible this actually is. If cards are made they should be limited to the most renown, definitely not more than the original 151 Pokemon, maybe some expansion packs can be released in the future.

If nobody else has big plans for this kind of thing I would certainly be interested in heading the project. I wouldn't be able to do it alone, but it is something I'm seriously interested in.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I’m 118th

That’s pretty cool, I expected to be a lot lower.

Just had a quick look & I’m now into 85.



Edit - The playing card idea sounds cool

[eddie13]

Here are some of my previous works..

We'll tokenize the trading cards by creating a Ethereum smart contract and a shiny ICO to go with it!

Errrr.... You could do it on Bitcoin with Counterparty..

This Bitcoin signed message proves that I created the above assets, how many of them I still own, others I own, and my trade history on the Counterparty Decentralized Exchange, all on the Bitcoin blockchain. eddie13 9/24/2018
1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
H2ifpy6/gQIDD6uI3LOFXKee2X/Hql7fsMiy1I1S+VcALfhzg9LpIYaihss9DgUrP0W2x60FmwnwycLJqbDvwKM=

https://xchain.io/address/1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff

I'm not much of an artist but I think this stuff is pretty nifty and fun..

If a smart coder made a copy of this...  rarepepewallet.com/

Then we could all make our own card, register our own assets, list them on the DEX, buy/sell/trade with eachother, and send eachother cards to our BTC addys..
Pretty much just copy that project..  
That site also functions as the DEX, you can place your DEX orders from the site..

[bitmover]

Hello Vod.

Nice job.

I found a typo :
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitmover

Merited History    RECIEVED   SENT

[krogothmanhattan]

Niice background you placed VOD but it is hard to decipher the list. I prefer it the original way...just my two satoshis

[bitmover]

yes it can recognizing a person that connected in bitcoin through email adds.If you share your email address to others.

Lol.

These kind of users cry about having zero merit.

He didn't even read anything. He thinks we are talking about find real life identification?

What is the incentive for this kind of user to post now ? They don't have a signature... Soon he will realize he won't get merits and will stop posting (hopefully)

[TheBeardedBaby]

I guess he can easily recognise me with my beard and my baby face. Then I have to be a bit higher in the recognition list

[JayJuanGee]

I guess he can easily recognise me with my beard and my baby face. Then I have to be a bit higher in the recognition list

Didn't I read that consistently wearing an avatar (and presumably the same avatar) helps with longer term recognition?  Perhaps in this thread?

When I joined the forum (February 2014), the adding of avatars was disabled, seems like such disabling persisted well into 2015, yet once avatars were re-enabled, I placed my current avatar, and have kept it in place. 

From time to time, I had considered changing my avatar; however, I had also thought that my consistent avatar is a means for my posts to be more easily recognized without even looking at my user-name (for good or bad), and provides a bit of convenience to readers and perhaps to myself when it becomes a bit easier to interact with some members because they already have some familiarity with some of the content and style of my post history (which they sometimes get wrong, too, but seems like recognition causes at least a kind of starting point in any dialogue that might take place, even if such dialogue starts with me attempting to correct the seeming misconceptions.. hahahahaha).

[paxmao]

I think that your systems works. As I descend in the list I recognise much less users. I admit that I have not come across a few on the top.

[KonstantinosM]

My name is not even on the list. I guess, it's because I haven't done any trades on the forum to gain a trust rating yet.


Does anyone here recognize me?

[TheBeardedBaby]

Quick Recognition Statistics >
From 1000 most recognized profiles there are :

217.......... Inactive users
2.............. VIPs
3.............. Brand new
21............ Donators
19............ Staff members
3.............. Global Moderators
23............ Cooper Members
3.............. Newbies
3.............. Jr. Members
10............ Members

Haven't count the Full/Sr./Hero/Legendary but I can do it if anyone is interested.

[r1s2g3]

Does anyone here recognize me?

Sorry KonstantinosM .

Who are you???

[JayJuanGee]

Quick Recognition Statistics >
From 1000 most recognized profiles there are :

217.......... Inactive users
2.............. VIPs
3.............. Brand new
21............ Donators
19............ Staff members
3.............. Global Moderators
23............ Cooper Members
3.............. Newbies
3.............. Jr. Members
10............ Members

Haven't count the Full/Sr./Hero/Legendary but I can do it if anyone is interested.

I don't know if Copper member is a status that is indicative of hardly anything, except that the member paid a small fee in order to be able to by-pass some of the newbie restrictions (and perhaps merely to just contribute financially to the forum).  Breaking down by rank does seem to be one of the most interesting categories.

My name is not even on the list. I guess, it's because I haven't done any trades on the forum to gain a trust rating yet.

Does anyone here recognize me?

Even though you have been a forum member for more than 16 months longer than me, and even though I merited one of your posts a couple of weeks ago, I had not recognized you upon sight of your username.

By the way, my profile is 95th most recognized, and so far, I never sent nor received a trust rating, even though trust is supposed to be one of the "recognition" criteria, my recognition seems to have risen due to the other criteria.... and I don't even have a "v" or an "o" or a "d" in my username... Go figure?

[TheBeardedBaby]

~
I don't know if Copper member is a status that is indicative of hardly anything, except that the member paid a small fee in order to be able to by-pass some of the newbie restrictions (and perhaps merely to just contribute financially to the forum).  Breaking down by rank does seem to be one of the most interesting categories.

The problem is that the Copper Membership replaces your current rank in your profile page, so when parsed it gets only the Copper Membership as a rank information. This is a bit pity. As I know the only place to see your actual Rank when wearing the CM is on the post page under your Avatar, but this info is not parsed.

Edit >
Most merited inactive members 90 in total >

Code:

1	satoshi 💤	        1216
2	nullius 💤	        755
3	pitipawn 💤	478
4	Ajpa94 💤	        250
5	TheBobyHunter 💤	244
6	laszlo 💤	        190
7	niknik1966 💤	151
8	Tomatocage 💤	150
9	nessie.io 💤	148
10	aliyagiz207 💤	142
11	fengxia 💤	        130
12	Moloch 💤	        124
13	Hal 💤	        122
14	Dr.Mann 💤	119
15	Gleb Gamow 💤	118
16	nickbelski 💤	117
17	gallisiardi 💤	116
18	alia 💤	        113
19	LastJedi 💤	        112
20	dinofelis 💤	109
21	dumbdragon 💤	104
22	Dice-Bet 💤	101
23	doudou1110 💤	100
24	Bolt Brownie 💤	100
25	Baltazaar 💤	96
26	allowance1219 💤	96
27	SeverusSnegg 💤	94
28	colacat1111 💤	        93
29	btcminer6212 💤	91
30	choubao0514 💤	        90
31	cannycassiopeia 💤	90
32	oneforall 💤	90
33	BarkingHawk 💤	90
34	jl777 💤     	89
35	kschneezy 💤	86
36	Bitcoiner12 💤	84
37	warningsigns 💤	82
38	Battlestar_Coin 💤	78
39	monero 💤	        77
40	Payne976 💤	72
41	keepboxm 💤	70
42	b4h4mu7 💤	65
43	conspirosphere.tk 💤	64
44	Blue Tyrant 💤	62
45	Steepdev 💤	60
46	fanatic26 💤	60
47	Craige288 💤	60
48	Vitalik Buterin 💤	59
49	curiosity81 💤	59
50	HodorHodl 💤	58
51	belcher 💤  	58
52	unknownids 💤	55
53	bcmine 💤  	55
54	CryptonikaTrade 💤	55
55	btcnerdie 💤	54
56	decred 💤   	53
57	bytemaster 💤	52
58	grandefuturo 💤	52
59	BiPolarBob 💤	52
60	mrbenjie 💤	51
61	BlindMayorBitcorn 💤	51
62	negeroy 💤  	51
63	gruve_p 💤	51
64	monocolor 💤	51
65	cho99 💤	        51
66	CornHub 💤	50
67	Kda2018 💤	50
68	vanessa81 💤	50
69	_church 💤	        50
70	BigBoozie 💤	50
71	lfloorwalker 💤	50
72	D3Pool 💤	        50
73	Arysum 💤	        50
74	Aleksabit 💤	50
75	mthcl 💤	        50
76	Karodozo 💤	50
77	plucking23 💤	50
78	iCEBREAKER 💤	49
79	yangS 💤    	49
80	rasputincoin 💤	48
81	Sunderland 💤	48
82	superjeyy 💤	47
83	Annon001 💤	46
84	Joe-Niner 💤	45
85	BitcoinFX 💤	45
86	iudica 💤	        45
87	coblee 💤	        44
88	Ermancyp 💤	43
89	nonnakip 💤	42
90	freebutcaged 💤	41

[bitmover]

By the way, my profile is 95th most recognized, and so far, I never sent nor received a trust rating, even though trust is supposed to be one of the "recognition" criteria, my recognition seems to have risen due to the other criteria.... and I don't even have a "v" or an "o" or a "d" in my username... Go figure?

Even though you do not have a trust rating, your activity and merit ranting are quite high.

This recognition is calculated using trust, merit (earning) and activity.

I got a higher recognition than I expected as well, with low activity and zero trust.