Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 08:42:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Unearthing the deep Web [worst bitcoin hit piece ever]  (Read 5370 times)
Andrew Bitcoiner (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396
Merit: 250


Send correspondance to GPG key A372E7C6


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 02:39:14 PM
 #1

Reading this article you would assume bitcoiners are all the worst things a person could be rolled into one  Roll Eyes

http://www.studlife.com/scene/2011/10/13/unearthing-the-deep-web/

MAKE MONEY! ADVERTISE FOR BITCOINS http://www.bitcoinadvertising.com
Bitcoin News Site http://coinbits.com
Bitcoin Blackjack http://bitjack21.com
Bitcoin, Darknet, IT consulting http://cryptophene.com
1714077766
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077766

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077766
Reply with quote  #2

1714077766
Report to moderator
1714077766
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077766

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077766
Reply with quote  #2

1714077766
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714077766
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077766

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077766
Reply with quote  #2

1714077766
Report to moderator
1714077766
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077766

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077766
Reply with quote  #2

1714077766
Report to moderator
1714077766
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714077766

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714077766
Reply with quote  #2

1714077766
Report to moderator
deslok
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


It's all about the game, and how you play it


View Profile
October 13, 2011, 02:45:07 PM
 #2

Assassination for bitcoin, very interesting.

"If we don't hang together, by Heavens we shall hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin

If you found that funny or something i said useful i always appreciate spare change
1PczDQHfEj3dJgp6wN3CXPft1bGB23TzTM
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2011, 02:50:04 PM
 #3

Meh,

What bothers me more is the rapid decay of internet memes.  Tongue
BitcoinPorn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Posts: 69


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2011, 02:38:23 PM
 #4

I thought it was great.  Those people really are wasting the use of that domain name though.

elggawf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 14, 2011, 05:29:44 PM
 #5

I don't think it was particularly negative to Bitcoin, but man... what a retarded article. Jailbait is not pornographic, that's what kiddie porn is - the whole reason things like the Jailbait subreddit and JB sites hang around so long is because the pictures are by their nature not sexual (making it not immediately legal in the same way kiddie porn is, it may violate something like COPPA though, but IANAL) - it's only creepy because the people posting and viewing them do so in a sexual manner.

I would really like to see some sort of citation for the claim that the "dark web" is 400 times larger than the "surface web", and then there's the idiotic implication that the "surface web" only consists of things Google indexes.

On the whole this is a fluff piece, littered with keywords about the two or three next great demons of the internet (Silk Road, deep web, jailbait) with almost zero citation, research or interesting content. I'm guessing it's solely to attract hits, and it's working.

^_^
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
October 14, 2011, 05:41:47 PM
 #6

Saw that human experiments site months ago. Still having "bleach effects on fetus" tells me it's not being updated. It did sort of scream "Bonzai Kitten" when I first saw it. Glad to see it's just a fake troll after all.
johnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 14, 2011, 05:42:44 PM
 #7

I thought it was great.  Those people really are wasting the use of that domain name though.

*doublechecks domain name*

+1

1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
JackH
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 255


View Profile
October 14, 2011, 06:01:45 PM
 #8

Funny thing he forgot to mention is that the main criminal (Bitcoin) in this case is not residing on the so-called "Dark Web". Makes you wonder if we are that "Dark Web" after all  Wink

<helo> funny that this proposal grows the maximum block size to 8GB, and is seen as a compromise
<helo> oh, you don't like a 20x increase? well how about 8192x increase?
<JackH> lmao
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
October 14, 2011, 06:24:26 PM
 #9

I thought it was great.  Those people really are wasting the use of that domain name though.

*doublechecks domain name*

+1

heh

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 14, 2011, 06:26:00 PM
 #10

I guess what they meant by Dark Web is all the content that is on web facing machines that is not accessible by the general public, like for instance, the documents we have on our personal computers that are connected to the internet and that have some type of server(ftp, http, emule, torrents, etc). Altho i think the 400x bigger estimate is quite undervalued if that's what they meant.
For instance, I could be running a FTP server full of warez and only a selected few would have access to it. That would be a part of the Dark Web, per their definition.
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
October 14, 2011, 08:01:46 PM
 #11

Maybe "DarkWeb" is web being surfed or served by computers residing in dimly lit parents' basements?
amencon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 15, 2011, 07:42:57 AM
 #12

What a drama queen.

Sounds like surfing the internet traumatized him.
ThomasV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1896
Merit: 1353



View Profile WWW
October 15, 2011, 08:06:48 AM
 #13

"There are markets on DarkNet, some claim, where they sell human flesh by the pound. For Bitcoins, of course."

This is absolutely priceless.
It exposes how stupid and irrational people can be about what they do not understand.
I am definitely going to recycle that quote. I don't know what for, but I'm sure the opportunity will come.

PS: There are bidders on the Dark Net, some claim, who offered to pay one million Bitcoins for the head (or any other vital organ) of Davis Sargeant.

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks
Horkabork
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 15, 2011, 08:19:57 AM
 #14

Anyone who uses terms like "World Wide Web" in what's supposed to be a serious piece of journalism is either:

A) Not really a journalist.
B) Doing some sort of parody article, making fun of sensationalist journalism.
C) Secretly trying to tell everyone about Silk Road by "exposing" it and pretending it's bad, full knowing that his audience of college students will be able to read between the lines.
D) Actually a bot, writing articles based on markov chains and a cleverbot-style repository of Bitcoin chatter and regurgitated news articles and op-eds.
E) A time-traveler sent from the future, only he doesn't quite know current trends except what he learned in his Middle American History class, so he uses terms like "World Wide Web," wears Technicolor T-shirts, and says "Cowabunga" a lot. Also, in the future Bitcoin is somehow involved in a robotic alien apocalypse, hence the need for the article.
F) Trolling for attention. The author, I assume, is fully knowledgeable that the only way to get exposure for your articles in a shitty student paper is to either be staggeringly good at researching and writing on a topic that's altogether new to media (such that it might be adopted mainstream) or to be incendiary and biased such that non-student readers come to you out of disagreement and hatred.

If I was the author, would have done the latter but at least included some hidden text within the article, such as an acrostic or having the first word of every sentence combine to form a limerick. But, as long as this guy is writing Bitcoin fan fiction, I don't see how you can fail to author a tender moment of lovemaking between Bruce Wagner and Mark Karpeles. The name "Cerulean Tower," where Mt. Gox is located is so perfect a location for this romantic affair that it sounds like I made it up. Or at least this guy should have included the local effects of bitcoin, such as how the new currency might possibly impact the epic civil war between campus squirrels, potentially harming the acorn-based economy of the industrial North Campus Red-Backs.

Me: 15gbWvpLPfbLJZBsL2u5gkBdL3BUXDbTuF
A goat: http://i52.tinypic.com/34pj4v6.jpg
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
October 15, 2011, 08:40:23 AM
 #15

"There are markets on DarkNet, some claim, where they sell human flesh by the pound. For Bitcoins, of course."

I am definitely going to recycle that quote. I don't know what for, but I'm sure the opportunity will come.
+1

I am willing to bet we all live to the time where we can use this... not so soon though...
Nesetalis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 15, 2011, 09:00:18 AM
 #16

wow... isn't that special. Now wouldnt you want to buy humans alive, by the inverse weight? I mean, why would I pay more for a 500lb person? :p

ZOMG Moo!
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
October 15, 2011, 09:48:24 AM
Last edit: October 15, 2011, 03:52:51 PM by Gabi
 #17

Quote
I wound up on a site about human experimentation. Like the Nazi experiments. A site reporting the progress of several experiments on unconsenting men, women and children. Experiments like a fetus’s tolerance of bleach. Experiments like the deprivation of food, water or medication. “Not all humans are equal, for some of them were born superior to others,” proclaimed the site’s banner. The victims are homeless and unregistered citizens. Welcome to your first time on DarkNet.

Yeah, sure. Do they think we are so idiot to believe such BULLSHIT???

RandyFolds
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 15, 2011, 10:19:29 AM
 #18

Yeah, on the weekends, me and my buddies get together and use bitcoin to buy human flesh that we eat raw while we masturbate (to bitcoin camwhores) and play russian roulette (that we stream for other people to bet bitcoin on) and rail every powder we can get on silk road (for bitcoin) off of the bodies of nude underage women (that we purchased from russia with bitcoin).

Bitcoin: shit's dark, holmes.
WiseOldOwl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
October 15, 2011, 01:13:16 PM
 #19

Damn,
I am hoping the experiments are fake. Some of that shit is sick, but I wonder how does someone get that sick??
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
October 15, 2011, 03:53:48 PM
 #20

The whole article is so fail  Roll Eyes Yeah sure, horrible experiments that guess what, appear exactly in what you are attacking... wow...

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!