nighteyes (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
October 14, 2011, 08:06:31 PM |
|
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/10/13/hats-off-or-get-out-valley-stores-lapd-to-ban-headgear-in-anti-crime-effort/...Under the program, a “warning notice” will be placed in the window of a business that caters to walk-in customers “to allow the customer time to remove their hat, hoodie or helmet” before entering, LAPD officials said. If they refuse to comply, “they’d be in violation of penal code 602, which is essentially trespassing within that business,” said LAPD Capt. Justin Eisenberg.... Because robbers really care about being issued a trespassing ticket when they rob and we dont need anyone buying hats,hoodies or helmets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
October 14, 2011, 08:26:12 PM |
|
This has nothing to do with crime, and everything to do with turning the country into one giant version of high school.
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
October 14, 2011, 09:03:30 PM |
|
This has nothing to do with crime, and everything to do with turning the country into one giant version of high school.
lol +1
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
JeffK
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I never hashed for this...
|
|
October 14, 2011, 11:58:09 PM |
|
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/10/13/hats-off-or-get-out-valley-stores-lapd-to-ban-headgear-in-anti-crime-effort/...Under the program, a “warning notice” will be placed in the window of a business that caters to walk-in customers “to allow the customer time to remove their hat, hoodie or helmet” before entering, LAPD officials said. If they refuse to comply, “they’d be in violation of penal code 602, which is essentially trespassing within that business,” said LAPD Capt. Justin Eisenberg.... Because robbers really care about being issued a trespassing ticket when they rob and we dont need anyone buying hats,hoodies or helmets. This really isn't any different from "No shirts, no shoes, no service" signs, except now businesses can call the police about it (although they likely could call the police for 'trespassing' in such a way before)
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
October 15, 2011, 01:25:43 AM |
|
"No shirts, no shoes, no service" is actually part of the health code, not the sole preference of the property owner. Also, as you stated property owners already have the right to eject anyone they like from their property, for any reason.
|
|
|
|
repentance
|
|
October 15, 2011, 03:35:30 AM |
|
Banks here have had such signs for a very long time and I'm seeing them more often on other business premises too. While everyone understands that they're about your face being visible both to staff and to the CCTV cameras, I suspect that few businesses are going to activate their silent alarms (even if they have them) every time a customer enters without removing their head covering. In most cases, the customer would be long gone by the time the police got there anyway.
|
All I can say is that this is Bitcoin. I don't believe it until I see six confirmations.
|
|
|
Jalum
|
|
October 15, 2011, 05:39:42 PM |
|
There are these things called gangs. Wearing your hat one way or the other might signify that you're in a gang, or it might mislead someone into thinking that. This could lead to violence and/or property damage. Banning hats will reduce some (thought certainly not all) of that violence at very little cost.
|
......................................... █████████████████ ███ ██ █ ██ ███ ██ █████ █ █████ ██ ███ █ █ █████ █ █ ███ ███ █ ███ █ ███ █ ███ ██ ███ ██ ███ █ ███ ██ ███ ██ ██ ████ █ █████ ██ ███ ██ █ ███ █ ███ █ ██ ███ █ █ ██ █ ██ █ ██ █ ██ █ █ █████ █ █████ █ █████ █ █ ██ █ ████ █ ████ █ ██ █ █ ███ ████ ██ █ ██ ████ ███ ██ █ █████ █ █████ █ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████ █ ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ █ ██████ █ ███ ████ █ ██████████ █ ████ ██ █████ █ ██████ ██ ███ ██ █ ███ ███ █████████████████ | ARROUND
| | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| .
| | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
| | . • Telegram • ANN Thread • Bounty Thread • Whitepaper |
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
October 15, 2011, 10:46:47 PM |
|
There are these things called gangs. Wearing your hat one way or the other might signify that you're in a gang, or it might mislead someone into thinking that. This could lead to violence and/or property damage. Banning hats will reduce some (thought certainly not all) of that violence at very little cost.
You must have some hardcore gangs around where you live if they are worried about signage.
|
|
|
|
|