|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RockHound
|
 |
February 24, 2014, 10:21:07 AM |
|
Thanks for posting!
Many threads on here regarding MtGox's possible insolvency. I will remain unbiased until an official statement has been made.
However, can anyone help OP confirm these External Test BTC Transfers?
|
|
|
|
|
BitCoinNutJob
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2014, 10:28:00 AM |
|
good find
|
|
|
|
|
|
notig
|
|
February 24, 2014, 10:39:43 AM |
|
isn't this just one of those dust transactions that they have been doing all along that gmaxwell mentioned?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
February 24, 2014, 11:03:54 AM |
|
... or did the txid change ...
=squeak=
|
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
Juneass
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 11:09:38 AM |
|
Propability of this being a new transaction is slim to null.
If they even were testing a solution they would have updated the public.
Think of it like this.
If MtGox had any news they would have posted it to ensure the market about there solvency.
Compare it to a bank, if a bank had problems they would shut down and inform customers about why and how long. That information would be posted to combat instability, combat loss of value and save the trust of customers.
The lack of information and lack of deadline should, logically, tell the whole story in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
February 24, 2014, 11:13:30 AM |
|
Plus, at this point, they have to know how bad their public image right now... if there was something that worked properly, it would be very difficult for them to stop themselves from posting some positive news to try to save whatever reputation they have left.
If there is some good news, we'll definitely be hearing about it...
=squeak=
|
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
|
frito (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2014, 11:15:13 AM |
|
isn't this just one of those dust transactions that they have been doing all along that gmaxwell mentioned?
can u link? |
|
|
|
|
|
bananas
|
|
February 24, 2014, 01:14:52 PM |
|
isn't this just one of those dust transactions that they have been doing all along that gmaxwell mentioned?
yes, it is. nothign new. |
|
|
|
|
|
frito (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2014, 01:27:30 PM |
|
isn't this just one of those dust transactions that they have been doing all along that gmaxwell mentioned?
yes, it is. nothign new. whats a dust transaction? |
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
February 24, 2014, 01:51:11 PM |
|
whats a dust transaction? Typically tiny amounts that get put together into a low/no fee transaction, sweeping them up at low priority, to turn them into a single larger amount, to save on transaction size (and fee) later on a higher priority transaction. Too much dust, and you could end up having a transaction with a fee that is a lot higher than the coin you're actually trying to send. =squeak= |
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
|
frito (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:02:59 PM |
|
whats a dust transaction? Typically tiny amounts that get put together into a low/no fee transaction, sweeping them up at low priority, to turn them into a single larger amount, to save on transaction size (and fee) later on a higher priority transaction. Too much dust, and you could end up having a transaction with a fee that is a lot higher than the coin you're actually trying to send. =squeak= k thx. I dont see though what would be the purpose of this scheme in GOX outgoing transactions. Further more that transaction is ~1.3 btc with just 4 inputs. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitCoinsLOL
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:49:39 PM |
|
whats a dust transaction? Typically tiny amounts that get put together into a low/no fee transaction, sweeping them up at low priority, to turn them into a single larger amount, to save on transaction size (and fee) later on a higher priority transaction. Too much dust, and you could end up having a transaction with a fee that is a lot higher than the coin you're actually trying to send. =squeak= So it could be a faucet. |
I never thought my life could be. Anything but catastrophe. But suddenly I begin to see. A "BIT" of good luck for me. Cause I've got a golden ticket!
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
February 24, 2014, 05:22:02 PM |
|
k thx.
I dont see though what would be the purpose of this scheme in GOX outgoing transactions.
Further more that transaction is ~1.3 btc with just 4 inputs. Every transaction is an outgoing transaction, as well as an incoming transaction. That "outgoing" transaction could very well be an "incoming" transaction to another of MtGox's internal addresses, like one they are using specifically for dust collection, or one of many for cold wallet storage. Also, it isn't about the amount of the transaction (in BTC) but about the size of it (in bytes). There are some who would be doing deposits and withdrawals in the hundreds of coin, for example, and you don't want to send a transaction consisting of 100 inputs. I don't know what criteria they are using for their sweeping, but a routine collecting all pieces of coin valued at <1 BTC, and sweeping them up together to make a >1 BTC piece, is pretty reasonable for them to do. So it could be a faucet. . .. ... really? ... come on, you're not even trying... amateurish troll attempt... try harder... =squeak= |
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
|
DubFX
|
|
February 24, 2014, 05:59:30 PM |
|
Been a bit happy at 1st but then checked it and checked the posts here, and yeah i doesn't seem like new transaction toward users at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikcik
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:46:09 PM |
|
I didnt follow the GOX situation so just a quick question, isnt there any adress on blockchain that one can check to see the balance of mgtox wallet? I know there had been speculations about few BIG ammount wallets that they belong to bitstamp etc. So arent there any wallets that belonged to mgtox and they are knows... whats the balance of the wallets that might have been those of mgtox...
i belive over the years people know which wallet was the mgtox one, and i also belive that you can track the transactions, so once you know the original mgtox wallet you can track the newest one and look at it balance? Or am i missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
danieldaniel
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:56:28 PM |
|
I didnt follow the GOX situation so just a quick question, isnt there any adress on blockchain that one can check to see the balance of mgtox wallet? I know there had been speculations about few BIG ammount wallets that they belong to bitstamp etc. So arent there any wallets that belonged to mgtox and they are knows... whats the balance of the wallets that might have been those of mgtox...
i belive over the years people know which wallet was the mgtox one, and i also belive that you can track the transactions, so once you know the original mgtox wallet you can track the newest one and look at it balance? Or am i missing something?
I think the issue is that there isn't just one wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Mikcik
|
|
February 24, 2014, 09:25:43 PM |
|
I didnt follow the GOX situation so just a quick question, isnt there any adress on blockchain that one can check to see the balance of mgtox wallet? I know there had been speculations about few BIG ammount wallets that they belong to bitstamp etc. So arent there any wallets that belonged to mgtox and they are knows... whats the balance of the wallets that might have been those of mgtox...
i belive over the years people know which wallet was the mgtox one, and i also belive that you can track the transactions, so once you know the original mgtox wallet you can track the newest one and look at it balance? Or am i missing something?
I think the issue is that there isn't just one wallet. well and tried somebody track all ofthe possible wallets and look at the funds there... it should be really easy this way to find out how BTC solvent mgtox is... |
|
|
|
|
|
