Have you ever wondered why ICOs fail?

[b3llsf1l3s]

We have wondered, and although there could be many reasons that could cause a project to fail; perhaps one of the biggest ones is their lack of investment in a proper PR campaign...

This is why PR is so important for startups and ICOs in general: https://cryptocoin.news/icos/3-ways-pr-is-critical-for-an-ico-18557/

ICO failed because the team always delayed date in the project's roadmap. This is even happened to a project that reached hardcap. Its gonna bad if project didnt follow as scheduled plans.

They should do calculation before make the roadmap. Think about consequences

[rightway00372018]

We have wondered, and although there could be many reasons that could cause a project to fail; perhaps one of the biggest ones is their lack of investment in a proper PR campaign...

This is why PR is so important for startups and ICOs in general: https://cryptocoin.news/icos/3-ways-pr-is-critical-for-an-ico-18557/

ICO failed because the team always delayed date in the project's roadmap. This is even happened to a project that reached hardcap. Its gonna bad if project didnt follow as scheduled plans.

They should do calculation before make the roadmap. Think about consequences

for me i believed ICOs are falling it's because of so many coins  available in the market that will compete with it and i think proper regulation of cryptocurrency is the best way to resolve the problems.

[KevenDabid]

I think just because they're hype, that's why it's a failure.
The success of an ICO does not equate to a sharp rise in the price of tokens.
There may be some misunderstanding about this.

[pinoyrichkids]

We have wondered, and although there could be many reasons that could cause a project to fail; perhaps one of the biggest ones is their lack of investment in a proper PR campaign...

This is why PR is so important for startups and ICOs in general: https://cryptocoin.news/icos/3-ways-pr-is-critical-for-an-ico-18557/

Not just the PR campaign, but the insights and perception of the investing public really matters, this is because of the trading strategies nowadays that applies the pump and dump and then leave, this is one of the reason why ICO's and other tokens definitely fail in the future, because of the lack of trust from the crypto community, whether we accept it or now, thats the trend nowadays. People have fear of losing of their invested money.

[Alone055]

Besides the PR team, lack of productivity is the biggest reason why ICOs fail.
A project, not having any good enough products or services to provide to the public, is never going to stay for so long because the investors are the public, and if they don't see anything interesting in a project, they won't invest in it knowing it won't succeed at all.
Just have a look at the products from the past that have been successful. They all had some useful things to offer to their investors, and their work wasn't invisible to the eye like the most of them today. So that is basically the biggest reason why ICOs fail, because you cannot get a project to the highest level of success if it doesn't have anything to offer, no matter how good the PR team is.

[MainIbem]

We have wondered, and although there could be many reasons that could cause a project to fail; perhaps one of the biggest ones is their lack of investment in a proper PR campaign...

This is why PR is so important for startups and ICOs in general: https://cryptocoin.news/icos/3-ways-pr-is-critical-for-an-ico-18557/

Several factors are responsible for the failure of some ICOs.

1. There are some ICOs that are planned with failure in view. These are the ones we commonly call scam.
2. Some are related to what your referred article explained. Lack of professional marketing and packaging.
3. Content. Some ICOs have a shallow idea of what the project want to achive or address.

Not to overlook is the fact that the investing public is increasingly becoing aware of the needs or lack of it, of the various ICOs and are taking wise investing decisions. 

[asritajudin]

There is also the fact that a lot of ICOs are not here to stay. Some of them are just here to raise money and then leave the market with the money that people have invested in the project. Although the point about them not investing in proper PR campaigns is true. if a company wants to be in the market for a long time then what they need to do is to make sure that they have a good pr campaign.

Yes, I also agree with your suggestion because some company are not here to stay but to get money from there scammed projects as participants invest in it. It is good for a project to have a very good PR and they should also have a well written whitepaper and also a good manager and also have a very good product.

[waser12]

There are so many reasons for ICO failure. For example governmental restrictions or internal contradictions and so on.

[cryptokia]

There is so many reasons that I have seen in my life, when ICOs fail. I think the most common from them is that government made some regulations which prevent an ICO to exist, and send the tokens.

[Treasurer]

At this forum many wondered about the unsuccessfulness of ICO. And very many consider the bounty campaigns  in the existing form ineffective. However, there are ICO, which in a few days or even hours collect the right amount without any PR campaign, only thanks to some well-known member of the team (adviser) or cooperation with the current successful project.

[SeXy]

The argumentation championing their non-performance is indefinite, on the contrary solitary of the thoughts is being they don't chalk up the potency material and potency tools to holder and raised funds.

[informattem]

I have thought that those ICOs that have no work products or even blockchains are destined to be eliminated, and will not stay. This requires investors to learn more, learn more, and practice a pair of eye-catching, avoiding being cheated and making risks. Minimize, maximize benefits