Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 08:39:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: BOINC, cryptocurrencies  (Read 774 times)
a1batross (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 02:33:31 PM
 #1

Why not use BOINC as reward system?

Reward mechanism -- BOINC-based;
Transaction verification mechanism -- PoS, for example. (because it doesn't made a lot of calculations)

For verifying rewards I suggest hardcode BOINC projects (for example, WCG, Einstein@Home, Rosetta@Home) using an API.
It like this:
Miner's computer: -- Hi all in the *coin network! I'm a $USER. My boinc-client was sent work and I got N points.
Other computers: -- Yes, API of Project@Home said that you really sent work and you will get M coins. (or "Nothing" if Miner's computer is cheating).

When all coins is mined BOINC-based mechanism will be disabled and *Coin will be 100% PoS.

What you're think?
1715287194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715287194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715287194
Reply with quote  #2

1715287194
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715287194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715287194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715287194
Reply with quote  #2

1715287194
Report to moderator
1715287194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715287194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715287194
Reply with quote  #2

1715287194
Report to moderator
1715287194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715287194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715287194
Reply with quote  #2

1715287194
Report to moderator
Mivexil
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 04:10:52 PM
 #2

Ripple did something like that (though centrally verified), and there's also GridCoin or whatever it was called which works pretty much this way.

Would it work for Bitcoin? Maybe.
a1batross (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 04:24:52 PM
 #3

Ripple, yeah. But RippleLabs pays only 1.250.000 XRP every day. In my suggestion, network pays the miner depending on his credit (or points). But this will mine all coins too fast.
heretolearn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 08:48:37 PM
 #4

Yes Gridcoin does this. You should check it out.
dddbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 08:54:28 PM
 #5

I am researching a productive proof of work system that uses sha256d.

Imagine being able to do productive hashing at ASIC speeds
heretolearn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 11:31:53 PM
 #6

I am researching a productive proof of work system that uses sha256d.

Imagine being able to do productive hashing at ASIC speeds

Sounds interesting, I'm curious as to how that would be helpful. I mean surely there are better solutions to compute than hashes, isn't it ?
minerva
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 11:34:47 PM
 #7

I am researching a productive proof of work system that uses sha256d.

Imagine being able to do productive hashing at ASIC speeds

Sounds interesting, I'm curious as to how that would be helpful. I mean surely there are better solutions to compute than hashes, isn't it ?
primecoin

Tip-Jar: 15NN2YwMGAntKopJgAsFBJvfuCARkV62xo
dddbtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 26, 2014, 06:46:00 PM
 #8

I am researching a productive proof of work system that uses sha256d.

Imagine being able to do productive hashing at ASIC speeds

Sounds interesting, I'm curious as to how that would be helpful. I mean surely there are better solutions to compute than hashes, isn't it ?

It actually has nothing to do with the hashing algorithm itself, the productive proof of work system we're working on should be able to use the SHA256D hash for its calculations.  Because its productive, we want many large ASICs generating many solutions as fast as possible.
luv2drnkbr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 793
Merit: 1016



View Profile
February 26, 2014, 07:18:14 PM
 #9

ya ive been waiting for people to merge boinc projects into coins.  so far all we have is primecoin.  where is folding proteins coin and AIDS coin and seti at home coin and weather patterns coin....

Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 01:03:58 AM
 #10

It's hard to generate workunits for that kind of stuff on the fly, they need to come from a central repository (and these are not infinite/large enough).

https://www.coinlend.org <-- automated lending at various exchanges.
https://www.bitfinex.com <-- Trade BTC for other currencies and vice versa.
a1batross (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 11:51:40 AM
 #11

I think, it's possible support multiple projects.

And what is a problem in generating work on fly? If someone couldn't get work, he can get it later.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!