Are bounty participant really the cause of dumping coins?

[lKSLMNSLKnkndlksnkJ]

For my little exposure to some ICO's has made me notice from many investors apportioning most blame on bounty participant as the main cause of dumping coin on market far less than ICO prices. Some claim since they really dash them the coin for free they really do not care about the market but rather dump them and go their way leaving the fate of genuine investors and managers at the mercy of this dumped coins. But i  truly believe that bounty participant really engage their time and earn these coins of which some really don't dump just like that. What is the actual cause of dumping of most ICO coins, is it a matter of bounty participant, investors or on the part ICO managers concept of plan for these coins?

In my opinion, the primary dumpers in most projects are the early masternode buyers, or investors, as they try to recoup the money spent on the MN or ICO as soon as possible at any cost to the project.  Plus early MN and ICO investors typically get the most early rewards/bonuses, so they tend to not really give a hoot about projects.  It happens whenever anyone has too much of anything; they lose respect for it.

Add in the fact that 90% of projects reach price highs in the first few days after the first exchange listing, which is another commonly known effect these days, and everyone in the know scrambles to sell whatever they can asap, because after that, the only choice is to hold long term, and most folks don't have the patience to wait 2 or 3 years for a good project to mature.

And, when you look at bounty amounts, the developers are riding a fine line between giving out too much and not doing enough to get the word out properly.  Unfortunately, greed is a pervasive feature of the crypto world, and until the masses begin to pile in, the market will be subject to these types of actions by individuals unmoored by greed and selfishness.

[mari12]

Most times, it seems like they are. They play a huge role in this, and cause a dip in the prices of these coins. A lot of us bounty hunters are quick to sell off our coins or tokens immediately after we receive them, and it is usually not fair on these coins. We have a reasonable amount allocated to us, and dumping these coins are no good for them.

[seanjoseph]

most of them yes, but not all of bounty participant cause dumping coins.
because after bounty participant get their token, they will sell it immediately.
they want to quick money.
that's why the price of that coins dumping.

[reality18]

The massive dump of a coin does not come from bounty hunters. Bounty hunters only hold a small percentage of the entire coins generated for a project. The dump comes from the team and ICO investors who hold large percentage of the tokens.

[kicauklaten]

Maybe I am so hesitant about it. but the fact is indeed a great many cases it is true it is. the bounty hunter always sells massively coins they have simultaneously when it has already entered into the market. This caused the price of the market is down in large and even much of the estimated price. but the problem is getting a small allocation of bounty so I thought it would be hard to believe if the bounty is a major influence of the downturn happened.

[ice18]

Of course not bounty token allocations are just so little compared to those sold on ico 1% dump cannot really affect the price of a coin, in just 5 days it can recovered if all bounty coins dumped but its not actually the cause of it  I think its the investors the bag holders and the developers themselves who want to move on for their huge losses in the bear market they dumped and exchange their coins for the good and promising one.

[vebby]

I think it is precisely nothing to do. Why should affect. the bounty participant this only helps the passage of ICO in order to get more and more investors. has nothing to do with the price of coins that slump I think.

[universal3ee]

I does not think all the responsibility lies on the hunter as recently we see that a number of exchanges dumping ethereum although it is not their coins but the big drop of ethereum price will inevitably affect the confidence level of various coins user and even the whole crypto market. Me as a bounty hunter does not always just dump the coins after i receive it, there might be some good sheeps among the bad sheep and bad sheep among the good sheep, investors can also be the ones that is dumping the coins.

[Soundy]

Not true, I think there are many reasons why holders do dump a token or coin but I think the main reason is huge percentage discount that was given to some investors during private sale and presale.

[Tylev]

For my little exposure to some ICO's has made me notice from many investors apportioning most blame on bounty participant as the main cause of dumping coin on market far less than ICO prices. Some claim since they really dash them the coin for free they really do not care about the market but rather dump them and go their way leaving the fate of genuine investors and managers at the mercy of this dumped coins. But i  truly believe that bounty participant really engage their time and earn these coins of which some really don't dump just like that. What is the actual cause of dumping of most ICO coins, is it a matter of bounty participant, investors or on the part ICO managers concept of plan for these coins?

The fault of investors themselves in the fall of new tokens in the price when listing them on the exchange can be much more than the fault of the participants in the generosity campaign ICO. The participants in the generosity campaign ICO are allocated a few percent of the volume of tokens produced and besides, not all of them immediately sell their free tokens. Many of them expect that tokens will increase, in price and keep them. In addition, from my personal experience, I know that recently, when bounty hunters get these tokens, then by the time the price of tokens has decently gone down and it's simply pointless to sell them on the market.
 I think that it is investors who are responsible for the fall in the price of new tokens when transferring them to the stock exchange. They buy new tokens at the beginning of the ICO process with discounts of 40-50 percent and it is very profitable for them to immediately sell them at an ICO price, receiving up to 200 percent of the profits. And they have a great opportunity for this in time. Therefore, you do not need to shift your guilt to bounty hunters.

[mobireal]

Yes bounty hunters are even annoying sometimes why because after participating in there bounty work the won't hesitate to sell it off which makes that coin drops.

[Sanjida]

No it's not true I think some of the bounty hunters are forming onerous dump after the coins.but it doesn’t ensue  always.it they give you bounty tokens this will not affect the current worth.they some occasion the dumps but not all.

[doedz]

No, not the bounty hunters but the investors who made the dump price.
We can see and prove that there are only 1-2% of bounty hunter allocations from the total token sales.
Is it possible with a bounty hunter that only 2% can make a coin price dump up to 50%? LOL.

[Adreman23]

For my little exposure to some ICO's has made me notice from many investors apportioning most blame on bounty participant as the main cause of dumping coin on market far less than ICO prices. Some claim since they really dash them the coin for free they really do not care about the market but rather dump them and go their way leaving the fate of genuine investors and managers at the mercy of this dumped coins. But i  truly believe that bounty participant really engage their time and earn these coins of which some really don't dump just like that. What is the actual cause of dumping of most ICO coins, is it a matter of bounty participant, investors or on the part ICO managers concept of plan for these coins?

No. Bounty hunters are not the main reason why token/coins are dumping once it get listed on exchange. I think the main reason  is no demands or no new buyers of the coins/tokens so the result is huge selling. The most important factor to consider when choosing best coin is the marketing strategy of the team. In order for one project to grow the price it needs new investors or buyers. If marketing strategy is not effective the result is no demand and of course the price of token/coins also dump.

[btc_angela]

For my little exposure to some ICO's has made me notice from many investors apportioning most blame on bounty participant as the main cause of dumping coin on market far less than ICO prices. Some claim since they really dash them the coin for free they really do not care about the market but rather dump them and go their way leaving the fate of genuine investors and managers at the mercy of this dumped coins. But i  truly believe that bounty participant really engage their time and earn these coins of which some really don't dump just like that. What is the actual cause of dumping of most ICO coins, is it a matter of bounty participant, investors or on the part ICO managers concept of plan for these coins?

No. Bounty hunters are not the main reason why token/coins are dumping once it get listed on exchange. I think the main reason  is no demands or no new buyers of the coins/tokens so the result is huge selling. The most important factor to consider when choosing best coin is the marketing strategy of the team. In order for one project to grow the price it needs new investors or buyers. If marketing strategy is not effective the result is no demand and of course the price of token/coins also dump.

I disagree, we all know for a fact that bounty hunters wanted to get the reward for their hard work. Just imagine working 4-8 months straight without any pay. Of course the moment you got the chance to make money out of the project then by all means they will do a dump. If there's no demand it means the project sucks or doesn't have real usage that's why bounty hunters/investors needed to offload it to get their investment backs (time and money).

[NewRanger]

No, not the bounty hunters but the investors who made the dump price.
We can see and prove that there are only 1-2% of bounty hunter allocations from the total token sales.
Is it possible with a bounty hunter that only 2% can make a coin price dump up to 50%? LOL.

investors psychology influenced by bounty hunter action when they dumping coins.after bounty hunter dumped their token, much investor worru about their investment if it continue.and finaly followed this action too.

[asus09]

For my little exposure to some ICO's has made me notice from many investors apportioning most blame on bounty participant as the main cause of dumping coin on market far less than ICO prices. Some claim since they really dash them the coin for free they really do not care about the market but rather dump them and go their way leaving the fate of genuine investors and managers at the mercy of this dumped coins. But i  truly believe that bounty participant really engage their time and earn these coins of which some really don't dump just like that. What is the actual cause of dumping of most ICO coins, is it a matter of bounty participant, investors or on the part ICO managers concept of plan for these coins?

Yes, it is true. but good teams and developers have a strategy for that, because after all that will happen after the reward has been shared throughout the campaign. dumping will never be avoided.
that's why it happened, because ico is not good or everything you want. the influence of investors can also be a factor. investing in ico is currently more in the mode of quickly looking for wealth, why is there a lot of dumping going on.

[universal3ee]

Maybe some of them are but definitely not all the bounty hunters will do this, mass bounty hunters have a higher possibility of dumping the coins after they receive it why i say so is because if a bounty hunter is not doing mass bounty a high chance that he really do research on the ICO he is participating in, whereas mass bounty hunter will participate in whatever bounty they are able to find. However dumping of coins does not only restrict to bounty hunter only like recently we see many sell off from ICO or even investors.

[dubynin1990]

I'm sure it's not the hunters, see how many projects allocate funds to bounty campaign, where 2-3% is the maximum that I have seen is 5%. Many hunters do not sell your coins expecting bigger profits in the future. And do you really think that these 2% bring down the price? I think bring down the price of early investors, who first participated in the ICO and got a big bonus and after the IPO coins, sell all your stocks. This is a more realistic picture of the hunters here are not guilty of anything, they are ordinary, hardworking people

[Golftech]

No, not the bounty hunters but the investors who made the dump price.
We can see and prove that there are only 1-2% of bounty hunter allocations from the total token sales.
Is it possible with a bounty hunter that only 2% can make a coin price dump up to 50%? LOL.

investors psychology influenced by bounty hunter action when they dumping coins.after bounty hunter dumped their token, much investor worru about their investment if it continue.and finaly followed this action too.

Those who got the coins from pre selling period are mostly the one causing the dumped they have a lots of coins so when it reached exchange
they can easily sell it with ico value plus the bonuses that they've got buying it with pre sale value, bounty hunters can influence only if they've
moved investors to panic while the coins still new inside the exchange.