Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 08:52:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Gavin Andreesons/Gregs extension. The only way to stop fractional exchanges  (Read 1757 times)
jubalix (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1023


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2014, 09:11:06 PM
Last edit: February 25, 2014, 10:07:24 PM by jubalix
 #1

I read recently (if not hoax) that Gav or Greg was suggesting a protocol addition so that you could prove and exchange has all the BTC it says it has.

Without something like this, I think all exchanges will yield to the temptation to fractional practice, by design or fault.

With it, it would make the btc side one of the safer ways to invest....with any entity as you can check at any tie their claims as to reserves.

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist. B.Engineering/B.Laws

https://www.binance.com/?ref=10062065
alp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 284
Merit: 101


View Profile
February 25, 2014, 09:17:52 PM
 #2

I read recently (if not hoax) that Gav was suggesting a protocol addition so that you could prove and exchange has all the BTC it says it has.

Without something like this, I think all exchanges will yield to the temptation to fractional practice, by design or fault.

With it, it would make the btc side one of the safer ways to invest....with any entity as you can check at any tie their claims as to reserves.

No protocol extension is needed for this.  The problem with relying on this methodology is let's say an exchange doesn't actually have your funds.  What are you going to do now?  You are still going to get Goxed.

I am looking for a good signature. Here could be your advertisement
HeliKopterBen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 09:34:44 PM
 #3

I read recently (if not hoax) that Gav was suggesting a protocol addition so that you could prove and exchange has all the BTC it says it has.

Without something like this, I think all exchanges will yield to the temptation to fractional practice, by design or fault.

With it, it would make the btc side one of the safer ways to invest....with any entity as you can check at any tie their claims as to reserves.

No protocol extension is needed for this.  The problem with relying on this methodology is let's say an exchange doesn't actually have your funds.  What are you going to do now?  You are still going to get Goxed.

A tool like this, whether a protocol extension or not, would allow customers to audit the exchange against the blockchain in real time.  At least customers would be able to see the problem before it becomes a crisis (before 750,000 btc go missing).

Counterfeit:  made in imitation of something else with intent to deceive:  merriam-webster
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 09:47:56 PM
 #4

bitcoin don't stop the flux.
it accelerate !

stop thinking about thing for noob people.
bitcoin-QT is a noob presentation with a noob description and a noob facility action.

i don't want to integrate some "3D secure" like mastercard/visa security ... it's shit, i must have my phone to validate a transaction ?!? What a joke ... and now, it's an obligation in Europe !
jubalix (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1023


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2014, 10:06:37 PM
 #5

I read recently (if not hoax) that Gav was suggesting a protocol addition so that you could prove and exchange has all the BTC it says it has.

Without something like this, I think all exchanges will yield to the temptation to fractional practice, by design or fault.

With it, it would make the btc side one of the safer ways to invest....with any entity as you can check at any tie their claims as to reserves.

No protocol extension is needed for this.  The problem with relying on this methodology is let's say an exchange doesn't actually have your funds.  What are you going to do now?  You are still going to get Goxed.

well it would show if they have all the btw they say they have not fiat though.....

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist. B.Engineering/B.Laws

https://www.binance.com/?ref=10062065
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013



View Profile
February 25, 2014, 11:16:34 PM
 #6

The problem with relying on this methodology is let's say an exchange doesn't actually have your funds.  What are you going to do now?  You are still going to get Goxed.
The method does achieve what it claims. An honest exchange can prove that it is honest.

It doesn't protect you from a dishonest exchange, but that technology isn't ready yet.
eldentyrell
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2014, 12:23:57 AM
 #7

I read recently (if not hoax) that Gav or Greg was suggesting a protocol addition so that you could prove and exchange has all the BTC it says it has.

Bitcoin already has this capability, and has had it since the very beginning.  No protocol additions required.

The reason it isn't being used has nothing to do with technology.

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
eldentyrell
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1004


felonious vagrancy, personified


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2014, 12:24:44 AM
 #8

No protocol extension is needed for this.  The problem with relying on this methodology is let's say an exchange doesn't actually have your funds.  What are you going to do now?  You are still going to get Goxed.

Much smaller goxxings, much earlier in the game => good

The printing press heralded the end of the Dark Ages and made the Enlightenment possible, but it took another three centuries before any country managed to put freedom of the press beyond the reach of legislators.  So it may take a while before cryptocurrencies are free of the AML-NSA-KYC surveillance plague.
jubalix (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1023


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2014, 01:41:07 AM
 #9

so how does it work exactly...the exchange keeps all btw on keys it signs offial message with or other message you can verify.

Anyway of gambling can be made provable with btw why not an exchange.

Just the fact that you have provable gambeling with BTC is going to kill most casino other gambling.

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist. B.Engineering/B.Laws

https://www.binance.com/?ref=10062065
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!