The new world currency in 2018?

[coinman76]

Rothschild: Get Ready For One World Currency By 2018

A Rothschild publication predicts that a one world currency is likely to be put in place as soon as 2018 – eroding individual nations’ sense of sovereignty.

The Rothschild-controlled Economist magazine published an article 30 years ago that highlighted the proabability of a world currency by the year 2018.

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports:

One must also keep in mind that the controlling interest of The Economist is held by the powerful Rothschild family, who regard themselves as the “custodians of The Economist magazine’s legacy.” In essence, the magazine operates as a quasi-propaganda arm for the Rothschild banking empire and related businesses and, is in many ways, meant to prime the pump of public opinion for the globalist agenda to be implemented.

The excerpt below appeared in the print magazine on January 9, 1988, in Vol. 306, pp 9-10.

Ready for the Phoenix

THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
–
At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

…

The New World Economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

…

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.

–

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

–

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

…

The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.

Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled “One world, one money.”

Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.

Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.

Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.

Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.

“GIVE ME CONTROL OF A NATION’S MONEY SUPPLY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS,” said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.

Articles about new world currency in 2018
en
https://kingworldnews.com/rothschilds-1988-prediction-for-new-world-currency-in-2018-set-to-rock-global-markets/
https://goldswitzerland.com/strong-gold-in-2018-vs-new-world-currency/ etc.
ru
http://svpressa.ru/economy/article/186128/ итд.



What do you think about the new world currency Phoenix in 2018 year?
Maibe its this coin Phoenixcoin https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/phoenixcoin/

[coinman76]

any ideas?

[renes]

It can be nothing but bitcoin, I don't think such cryptocurrency will be launched now, it is hard to be trusted like btc.

[Hydrogen]

If their proposed one world currency is named "phoenix" after a mythical bird which rises from the ashes of destruction and chaos. It would be a very amazing coincidence if there is a major push for adoption of this "phoenix" currency, if it occurred after major economic crashes on a global scale.

It could resemble a scenario where someone might wonder if events had specifically been planned and engineered to occur that way. Maybe the world's pension plans had specifically been designed to fail while fiat was deliberately overprinted worldwide to foment devaluation and economic carnage.

Of course, they had to ban Alex Jones as he was the only one crazy enough to challenge this and perhaps if he was lucky: expose it. What a crazy world we live in, even if very little if any of this turns out to be true.

[1Referee]

It can be nothing but bitcoin, I don't think such cryptocurrency will be launched now, it is hard to be trusted like btc.

If you force enough people to use a specific option, just like what's happening with fiat, people will obey.

My main concern is that with how fiat currencies will become tokens under full control of the governments issuing them, people more than ever will lose their freedom and won't be able to freely spend their money anymore. People will spend their money in the way they believe their government won't hop in and start making their life a hell, which is exactly what modernized censorship will look like in the forthcoming years.

Instead of wasting time, people need to make sure at least 10-25% of their wealth is converted to Bitcoin. People don't yet realize the importance of lowering their fiat exposure because they feel everything is all safe and sound right now, but it's really not. I did it years ago already and have currently around 75% of my wealth sitting in Bitcoin, and it feels great.

[manismanja]

yes you are right for now it seems that it has begun to enter the cryptocurrency era and many who know the cryptocurrency hopefully this can have a positive impact on cryptocurrency.

[coinman76]

i believe in Phoenixcoin, i think after update (big bictoin fork) soon this coin will 3-rd after btc and ltc with all the improvements. And Phoenixcoin one coin that has advanced checkpointing against 51% attacks. Algoritm neoscrypt that has PXC more faster eight times than bitcoin.

[davis196]

That's a really wrong prediction.I duess that people back in 1988 were predicting that somewhere around 2018,people will travel around space and populate Mars,etc.It's just bullshit.The technical progress just isn't that fast.The is a global currency.It's calles US dollar.No cryptocurrency has the strenght to change the US dollar status quo.

[hase0278]

The is a global currency.It's calles US dollar.No cryptocurrency has the strenght to change the US dollar status quo.

Cryptocurrency might not have enough strength to change the US dollar status quo, but IMO there are more currencies out there that might help that prediction become accurate. The currencies that have the strength to change the US dollar status quo IMO is gold, silver or any other fiat currency of a powerful nation that is rapidly developing(like China for example).

[avikz]

The entire idea of one world currency is absurd and not achievable unless there is a big worldwide economic meltdown where 99% of the currencies will loose its value reach lowest purchasing power. I am not referring to the underground market here. What I am referring is that a globally government accepted currency is not possible at the current scenario.

USA, China and EU will not let their currency dominance go out of their hand to maintain their supremacy!

[jseverson]

What do you think about the new world currency Phoenix in 2018 year?
Maibe its this coin Phoenixcoin https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/phoenixcoin/

If this is going to happen, it's certainly not going to be the Phoenixcoin lmfao. It's basically a Litecoin clone and its development seems mostly dead. The writer of the article seemed to have named this new world currency "phoenix" arbitrarily so it's not connected with the coin. Either way, it's a pretty interesting prediction, and it does seem like something somewhat similar to it was developed: the Euro.

But yeah, if we want to break worldwide barriers without ceding a sovereign country's ability to control their monetary supply and giving an international centralized body inordinate amounts of geopolitical capital, we can simply use Bitcoin alongside fiat. Bitcoin is the new world currency.

[BitHodler]

But yeah, if we want to break worldwide barriers without ceding a sovereign country's ability to control their monetary supply and giving an international centralized body inordinate amounts of geopolitical capital, we can simply use Bitcoin alongside fiat. Bitcoin is the new world currency.

Yup. I don't see why people keep focusing on Bitcoin to replace everything while banks, governments, fiat and Bitcoin can perfectly function alongside each other. We can use the best of all options offered. That's freedom.

Not everyone is interested in Bitcoin to dominate everything. If Bitcoin was to replace everything as some speculative noobs want it to do, all others would practically be forced to go with something they don't like.

Bitcoin can't handle the weight of the whole world, and for that reason we should be happy to have other options helping Bitcoin to evenly distribute the weight of the world population. Bitcoin even with LN isn't going to do it alone.

[DgurJIupyf]

I also believe that we are talking about bitcoin or its fork. The new coin will not be able to overcome the same barrier as bitcoin did in its time. However, if you look at Venezuela, how they created a national centralized coin equated to a barrel of oil and its price will be$ 60 So it is not clear yet what kind of coin we are talking about.

[pitiflin]

If their proposed one world currency is named "phoenix" after a mythical bird which rises from the ashes of destruction and chaos. It would be a very amazing coincidence if there is a major push for adoption of this "phoenix" currency, if it occurred after major economic crashes on a global scale.

It could resemble a scenario where someone might wonder if events had specifically been planned and engineered to occur that way. Maybe the world's pension plans had specifically been designed to fail while fiat was deliberately overprinted worldwide to foment devaluation and economic carnage.

Of course, they had to ban Alex Jones as he was the only one crazy enough to challenge this and perhaps if he was lucky: expose it. What a crazy world we live in, even if very little if any of this turns out to be true.

Phoenix sounds super fucking cool, but it won't take over Bit coin coin. .

Yup. I don't see why people keep focusing on Bitcoin to replace everything while banks, governments, fiat and Bitcoin can perfectly function alongside each other. We can use the best of all options offered. That's freedom.

Not everyone is interested in Bitcoin to dominate everything. If Bitcoin was to replace everything as some speculative noobs want it to do, all others would practically be forced to go with something they don't like.

Bitcoin can't handle the weight of the whole world, and for that reason we should be happy to have other options helping Bitcoin to evenly distribute the weight of the world population. Bitcoin even with LN isn't going to do it alone.

How can you not see why they are focusing on bitcoin to replace everything? Usually they are just doing it for the money or to shitpost here on this forum, they don't care about what the world needs. We can use bitcoin alongside, fiat, but we need to services to do so. It'd be freedom only when bitcoin users aren't forced to give KYC and it is not freedom if they get their accounts blocked. What we actually need is to live in a world, where banks don't do fuckall shit and there be some  liberty amongst people and we live in a countryless world. But we don't live in a perfect world, so fuck everything I just said.

[Dawson_V]

Actually, the currency is already here. It is not the Phoenix but the bitcoin. Yes, you heard me, it is the bitcoin. It is stronger than ever, even if governments are afraid of it. Some major businesses accept payments with virtual money. I think in the article, they meant that the Phoenix would be something virtual. Maybe 30 years ago, the world virtual money was to hard to understand but you get the picture. A phoenix does not exist in nature. It is a mythical bird. The bitcoin does not exist in nature. It is therefore equal to the Phoenix.  

[Streamlink]

Rothschild: Get Ready For One World Currency By 2018

A Rothschild publication predicts that a one world currency is likely to be put in place as soon as 2018 – eroding individual nations’ sense of sovereignty.

The Rothschild-controlled Economist magazine published an article 30 years ago that highlighted the proabability of a world currency by the year 2018.

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports:

One must also keep in mind that the controlling interest of The Economist is held by the powerful Rothschild family, who regard themselves as the “custodians of The Economist magazine’s legacy.” In essence, the magazine operates as a quasi-propaganda arm for the Rothschild banking empire and related businesses and, is in many ways, meant to prime the pump of public opinion for the globalist agenda to be implemented.

The excerpt below appeared in the print magazine on January 9, 1988, in Vol. 306, pp 9-10.

Ready for the Phoenix

THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
–
At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

…

The New World Economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

…

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.

–

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

–

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

…

The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.

Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled “One world, one money.”

Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.

Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.

Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.

Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.

“GIVE ME CONTROL OF A NATION’S MONEY SUPPLY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS,” said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.

Articles about new world currency in 2018
en
https://kingworldnews.com/rothschilds-1988-prediction-for-new-world-currency-in-2018-set-to-rock-global-markets/
https://goldswitzerland.com/strong-gold-in-2018-vs-new-world-currency/ etc.
ru
http://svpressa.ru/economy/article/186128/ итд.



What do you think about the new world currency Phoenix in 2018 year?
Maibe its this coin Phoenixcoin https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/phoenixcoin/

I have read the comments here and they seem quite funny. What kind of stupid topic is this? Who is even talking about one world currency this time around and why would anyone just come to discuss this $h!t!? Quite funny. I know it’s all these die hard fans of Bitcoin that just want to prove to the world they know every thing that will happen, just like they are God while they are no God. Those authors are very, very stupid.

[coinman76]

Rothschild: Get Ready For One World Currency By 2018

A Rothschild publication predicts that a one world currency is likely to be put in place as soon as 2018 – eroding individual nations’ sense of sovereignty.

The Rothschild-controlled Economist magazine published an article 30 years ago that highlighted the proabability of a world currency by the year 2018.

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports:

One must also keep in mind that the controlling interest of The Economist is held by the powerful Rothschild family, who regard themselves as the “custodians of The Economist magazine’s legacy.” In essence, the magazine operates as a quasi-propaganda arm for the Rothschild banking empire and related businesses and, is in many ways, meant to prime the pump of public opinion for the globalist agenda to be implemented.

The excerpt below appeared in the print magazine on January 9, 1988, in Vol. 306, pp 9-10.

Ready for the Phoenix

THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
–
At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

…

The New World Economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

…

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.

–

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

–

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

…

The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.

Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled “One world, one money.”

Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.

Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.

Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.

Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.

“GIVE ME CONTROL OF A NATION’S MONEY SUPPLY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS,” said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.

Articles about new world currency in 2018
en
https://kingworldnews.com/rothschilds-1988-prediction-for-new-world-currency-in-2018-set-to-rock-global-markets/
https://goldswitzerland.com/strong-gold-in-2018-vs-new-world-currency/ etc.
ru
http://svpressa.ru/economy/article/186128/ итд.



What do you think about the new world currency Phoenix in 2018 year?
Maibe its this coin Phoenixcoin https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/phoenixcoin/

I have read the comments here and they seem quite funny. What kind of stupid topic is this? Who is even talking about one world currency this time around and why would anyone just come to discuss this $h!t!? Quite funny. I know it’s all these die hard fans of Bitcoin that just want to prove to the world they know every thing that will happen, just like they are God while they are no God. Those authors are very, very stupid.

I do not know why it's ridiculous for you. I believe in phoenix and I treat these articles with full seriousness

[Mister1k]

As of now we all are controlled by the Rothschild so far we should not again need to go with the currency revolution by this family. Kindly all be attention and invest on bitcoin only give the more value that instead of giving access to the fiat cash.

So far there is no competition to bitcoin and then please do not allow the centralized cryptocurrency as a competitor else you will be need to stop the competitor on crypto market.

[elpiji]

it's ridiculous, I don't care about what they write, who are really they? god?
I don't believe in predictions from everyone at all

[coinman76]

As of now we all are controlled by the Rothschild so far we should not again need to go with the currency revolution by this family. Kindly all be attention and invest on bitcoin only give the more value that instead of giving access to the fiat cash.

So far there is no competition to bitcoin and then please do not allow the centralized cryptocurrency as a competitor else you will be need to stop the competitor on crypto market.

this is the last battle between the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers