Regulation vs transpanscy

[dave3k]

Is regulation the best way to prevent corrupt exchanges operating or would this be better achieved via better transparency?

Or is everything fine now?

Is there a better solution?

[Snail2]

Feather and tar. Then the next CEO will be much more careful with customers money .

[BlockChainLottery]

It's still a wild west out there. The most honest companies will prevail.
And the larger they are, the more people they will attract.
In the end only a few giant corporations will be left.
It always will end this way because of human nature.
And then a new revolution...

[Lauda]

Sue them, get the money back and we're good to go.

[FelixOliver]

The most honest companies will stand head and shoulders above the rest...

In this new economy, Honesty/transparency is almost as valuable as the currency itself.

So, overall, I think this is a natural process we're going through right now. The market is cleansing itself of all the excrement and filth that is stopping it from reaching that $12bn market cap again

[dave3k]

Feather and tar. Then the next CEO will be much more careful with customers money .

Damn, I forgot that option.   

[TheAccountant]

Exchanges create their own success.

[Mike Christ]

Step one: Overcome groupthink.
Step two: There is no step two.  Enjoy your new-found individuality, e.g. the ability to tell a good exchange from a bad one.

[LRCGROUP]

Ask the exchange to provide its security and risk concept, this will show you if they are a good or bad exchange. 
Regulation would force transparency to their security procedures.

[adworker]

Next time, do not do business with someone delaying withdrawals for months - clear sign of insolvency. In other words, care more where you are sending your money to, so transparency

[DannyHamilton]

Transparency would be good.

Independent Security and Financial audits would help.

Deposit insurance wouldn't be a bad idea either.