I found legal precedents that freeman arguments don't work in court. http://www.adl.org/mwd/suss1.asp
Let me get this straight. You are using the propaganda arm of the world zionist movement to solidify your negative theory about the Freemen ?
Go do some historical research on the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
Did you research the cases listed or are you taking the ADL's word for it ?
I will be the first to admit most Freemen dont do things right. The biggest problem they have is not disolving existing and past contracts they have/had with government, the existance of which gives the consent to govern them and make statutes apply to them. If you got a social security number, you are taxable. A social security number is voluntary and you can get it severed from your identity. The tax code states its a voluntary tax.
I would bet every one of those cases, if they are real and if they are indeed Freemen, either didnt follow proper proceedure (even though substance is SUPPOSED to rule over form), or had existing contracts with government that allowed them jurisdiction over them.
I'll check them out in the next few days though.
Thanks for posting it.
By the way, if you do things right you are no longer a citizen of the corporation of the United States of America. You would be a free sovereign man on the land.