Single Bet Roulette Strategy

[rolleth.io]

European roulette won the honorary status of the "king of casino games", and there is nothing surprising in the fact that over the centuries of its existence, European roulette has attracted a lot of adventurers and fans of easy money, who tried to create a win-win strategy for playing roulette. And it is logical that most of these strategies in modern realities are absolutely useless. Therefore, the strategy of the game of European roulette is not based on an attempt to "cheat" the outcome of the game, but rather on an attempt to reduce the loss of the roulette player.

One of the main principles of the strategy of profitable European roulette is to make external bets. For the most part, these are so-called "chance" bets, where the probability of a particular outcome is approximately 50%, but the chances of winning are much greater. In addition, a rather winning, although more risky, strategy of the game of European roulette is considered to bet on a combination of numbers – two numbers (split), three numbers (street), four numbers (corner).

Very important component of the European roulette strategy is the number of bets. Newcomers are often make a gross mistake, making several bets at the same time. In fact, it is much more profitable to make only one bet in each round.

Let's imagine that you decide to play at odds and bet $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number. Total in the amount of your costs is $54. If you get an even number, your winnings will be $35 (1*35). If you roll odd, the payout will be $70 (2*35). If it comes up zero, you lose all of that set – $54.

If you follow the strategy of one bet, the results of the next round of European roulette will look very different for you. Let's imagine you only place one bet – $35 on even numbers only. If your bet wins and it falls even, you win $70. If the bet loses, you lose $35. Your costs in this case are lower ($35 vs. $54), and the chance of winning in each of the two cases is exactly the same. Thus, adhering to the strategy of one bet, you save on losing and lose less than you could by making several different bets at the same time.

Today we have considered one of the most famous roulette strategies, and there are many of them on the market. And what strategies do you use? Share in the comments.

[1715243503]

1715243503

[1715243503]

1715243503

[1715243503]

1715243503

[1715243503]

1715243503

[1715243503]

1715243503

[milewilda]

Today we have considered one of the most famous roulette strategies, and there are many of them on the market. And what strategies do you use? Share in the comments.

When i do play roulette then i do make use of usual martingale rather than risking my entire bet on a double odd-even bet because when it hits zero then thats a big loss rather than using up a martingale you can still able to make money if the losing streak wont be that long but still its not a guaranteed thing or would ensure you to be profitable in the end of the day.Those calculations above is normal but its not really that special to focus on.

[Robert-Slotland]

Roulette strategies may increase the fun factor of the game, but will not have any effect on the long term payback of the game :-)

[s0lidus]

I don't really use a strategy. I just play with some money I can afford to lose and I start chasing a single number that comes up my mind.. Or maybe multiple (5-6) numbers.
Yesterday for example I wanted to chase the single number 18 and it hit on first bet (screenshot). So strategy? Not my thing.




But I understand people using certain strategies. For example Martingale on red/black odd/even etc. Or they even choose 18 random numbers and start doubling on loss.
Some players choose for a more aggressive gameplay: placing a bet on first, second or third dozen (12 numbers, x3 payout), and double on loss. Profit will be more if you hit, but it's very risky.
There are many possibilities on roulette, but it's very important to set limits and quit while you're still ahead, because when you're unlucky the bad streaks can be brutal.

[kryptqnick]

Very important component of the European roulette strategy is the number of bets. Newcomers are often make a gross mistake, making several bets at the same time. In fact, it is much more profitable to make only one bet in each round.

Let's imagine that you decide to play at odds and bet $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number. Total in the amount of your costs is $54. If you get an even number, your winnings will be $35 (1*35). If you roll odd, the payout will be $70 (2*35). If it comes up zero, you lose all of that set – $54.

If you follow the strategy of one bet, the results of the next round of European roulette will look very different for you. Let's imagine you only place one bet – $35 on even numbers only.

I believe the situation is different if you bet with 50/50 probability on both. Let's talk about betting on red and black. Say, you think blacks are going to win and you put 10 dollars on black. At the same time you put 5 dollars on red just in case. You spend 15 dollars. In case black is the winner, you get $20 or $5 of pure profit. I case red wins, you get 10 out of initial 15 dollars back. So, you either win or lose 5 dollars. If you only put 10 dollars on black, you lose them when the outcome is red, but win 10 more if the opposite case. The risk is higher with one bet and I kind of makes some sense to put money on both to lose less. There're some roulette strategies, but I believe that eventually you come to this rare case when something keeps going wrong and you lose everything, just like with martingale.

[Stroto]

Let's imagine that you decide to play at odds and bet $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number. Total in the amount of your costs is $54. If you get an even number, your winnings will be $35 (1*35) (you lose $54-$35=$19). If you roll odd, the payout will be $70 (2*35) (you win $70-$54=$16). If it comes up zero, you lose all of that set – $54.

For me strategies should be simple. If you place a bet of 1x on even/red and a 2x bet on odd/black in my mind it would cancel out 1x from both sides its just psychological that you seem to be earning (as in get some money back) when losing.

However, for your example, if you place $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number AND $2 on green you would pay $56. But it creates a loss-win-win situation. If even falls you'll lose $56-$35=$21, if odds or 0 you win $70-$56=$14. That $2 insurance on 0 effectively kills the total loss.

Now compare this with placing $0 on even, $1 on odd and $2 on 0. You pay $20 dollars. if you win with odd  $35-$20=$15 if it hits even you lose and you pay $20. if it hits 0 you'll get $70. Why people don't bet on 0 is beyond me.

I believe the situation is different if you bet with 50/50 probability on both. Let's talk about betting on red and black. Say, you think blacks are going to win and you put 10 dollars on black. At the same time you put 5 dollars on red just in case. You spend 15 dollars. In case black is the winner, you get $20 or $5 of pure profit. I case red wins, you get 10 out of initial 15 dollars back. So, you either win or lose 5 dollars. If you only put 10 dollars on black, you lose them when the outcome is red, but win 10 more if the opposite case. The risk is higher with one bet and I kind of makes some sense to put money on both to lose less. There're some roulette strategies, but I believe that eventually you come to this rare case when something keeps going wrong and you lose everything, just like with martingale.

Same goes for this 50/50 bet. If you put $10 on black and $5 on red you should not compare that to $10 on black and $0 on red. It is the same as $10 (black) - $5 (red) = $5 on black. it is just the psychological effect that having $20 payed out (while spending $15) seems more profitable then having $10 payed out (while spending just $5). The end result is the same, you win or lose $5

[GITcryptomaster]

the chances are very slim to win in roulette

[rolleth.io]

Roulette strategies may increase the fun factor of the game, but will not have any effect on the long term payback of the game :-)

It depends on the strategy and what the player wants to get in the end. I think it is better to use strategies, maybe even your own, to get profit.

[rolleth.io]

Today we have considered one of the most famous roulette strategies, and there are many of them on the market. And what strategies do you use? Share in the comments.

When i do play roulette then i do make use of usual martingale rather than risking my entire bet on a double odd-even bet because when it hits zero then thats a big loss rather than using up a martingale you can still able to make money if the losing streak wont be that long but still its not a guaranteed thing or would ensure you to be profitable in the end of the day.Those calculations above is normal but its not really that special to focus on.

I understand that martingale strategy attracts you the most? Please tell us more about why it is. How much did you manage to win using it?

[rolleth.io]

I don't really use a strategy. I just play with some money I can afford to lose and I start chasing a single number that comes up my mind.. Or maybe multiple (5-6) numbers.
Yesterday for example I wanted to chase the single number 18 and it hit on first bet (screenshot). So strategy? Not my thing.




But I understand people using certain strategies. For example Martingale on red/black odd/even etc. Or they even choose 18 random numbers and start doubling on loss.
Some players choose for a more aggressive gameplay: placing a bet on first, second or third dozen (12 numbers, x3 payout), and double on loss. Profit will be more if you hit, but it's very risky.
There are many possibilities on roulette, but it's very important to set limits and quit while you're still ahead, because when you're unlucky the bad streaks can be brutal.

Judging by the fact that you are so lucky, perhaps your intuition - the best strategy!

[rolleth.io]

Very important component of the European roulette strategy is the number of bets. Newcomers are often make a gross mistake, making several bets at the same time. In fact, it is much more profitable to make only one bet in each round.

Let's imagine that you decide to play at odds and bet $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number. Total in the amount of your costs is $54. If you get an even number, your winnings will be $35 (1*35). If you roll odd, the payout will be $70 (2*35). If it comes up zero, you lose all of that set – $54.

If you follow the strategy of one bet, the results of the next round of European roulette will look very different for you. Let's imagine you only place one bet – $35 on even numbers only.

I believe the situation is different if you bet with 50/50 probability on both. Let's talk about betting on red and black. Say, you think blacks are going to win and you put 10 dollars on black. At the same time you put 5 dollars on red just in case. You spend 15 dollars. In case black is the winner, you get $20 or $5 of pure profit. I case red wins, you get 10 out of initial 15 dollars back. So, you either win or lose 5 dollars. If you only put 10 dollars on black, you lose them when the outcome is red, but win 10 more if the opposite case. The risk is higher with one bet and I kind of makes some sense to put money on both to lose less. There're some roulette strategies, but I believe that eventually you come to this rare case when something keeps going wrong and you lose everything, just like with martingale.

I think that the strategy of one bet on the contrary reduces the risk, unfortunately, it seems to me that with different roulette it works differently.

[slaman29]

We all know strategies don't work in the long term. Long term payout will always prove to be accurate to the probabilities. But yes, it should be added here that while house edges on Bitcoin dice games are low, they are usually much higher on roulette. So anyone wanting to do simple martingale strategies for many hours should stick to dice. Simply because of house edge.

Roulette for me is pure fun when you only want to bet a few hands.

[BTCevo]

I believe this is pretty much not a quite good startegy that you tell us, it is pointless to bet $35 mean while there will be no chance to win some big amount here. And the chance of losing is pretty high too when you do not hit any good number there. So instead of betting using some strategy, usually I will only place 1 numbers and going to martingale it until it is hit. Not a very good strategy but it will work for sure

[squatz1]

Newcomers are often make a gross mistake, making several bets at the same time. In fact, it is much more profitable to make only one bet in each round.

I wouldn't go this far in saying that it's MUCH MORE PROFITABLE to make only one bet in each round. You may have better chances of winning yes, but you have no more chance to have more profitability.

When it comes to better, you're going to either be lucky or you're not going to be lucky. The house edge may be the factor in you being lucky or not (given if you make more bets or not) but in the end, you're either going to get lucky or you don't, and more times then not you're not going to end up lucky and the house is going to win.

I'd recommend understanding that there is no good gambling strat, and you're going to have to just bet for pleasure and not for gain.

[TheQuin]

Judging by the fact that you are so lucky, perhaps your intuition - the best strategy!

If you chase single numbers a lot you'll find they hit first time quite often as well.... about once every 37 tries. 

[just_Alice]

I like several bets, I think it's one of the biggest advantages of roulette over other chance games, e.g. dice games. I disagree that making one bet is more profitable, even in your example:

Let's imagine that you decide to play at odds and bet $1 on every even number and $2 on every odd number. Total in the amount of your costs is $54. If you get an even number, your winnings will be $35 (1*35). If you roll odd, the payout will be $70 (2*35). If it comes up zero, you lose all of that set – $54.

In such a case is you get an even number you win $35, but you should substract $35 from your winnings for $2 per each odd number that you've lost in this round, means you lose 0 and win 0. If you roll odd - you get $70-$18=$52 (for $1 per each even number during this round). So you either gain and lose 0, or win $52, that's exactly a win-win situation. And the probability of rolling zero is 1/36, which is much less than rolling either even or odd number (which is exactly 1/2).

If you follow the strategy of one bet, the results of the next round of European roulette will look very different for you. Let's imagine you only place one bet – $35 on even numbers only. If your bet wins and it falls even, you win $70. If the bet loses, you lose $35. Your costs in this case are lower ($35 vs. $54), and the chance of winning in each of the two cases is exactly the same.

And I disagree here, placing only one bet chances of losing jump from 1/36 to 1/2, even though the amount of your losses is less in this case eventually you'll lose more with this strategy.

[seoincorporation]

I have done betting bots for Roulette in the past. My strategy was the classic martingale but switch the color after win. For example, if i start with 1 dollar on red and lose, then place $2, if lose then place $4, and if that four win, i take my $1 profit and start again but now from black.  

This is not a always win method and to get some nice profit you have to spend lot of time making the risk of a bad streak bigger. But the logic is easy to code.

[Caladonian]

I have done betting bots for Roulette in the past. My strategy was the classic martingale but switch the color after win. For example, if i start with 1 dollar on red and lose, then place $2, if lose then place $4, and if that four win, i take my $1 profit and start again but now from black.  

This is not a always win method and to get some nice profit you have to spend lot of time making the risk of a bad streak bigger. But the logic is easy to code.

Classic martingale might give some chance if you know how to adjust, just like what you are doing, though its still a game of luck and gamblers who know
how to manage greediness and self discipline, back then when I still exploring the world of gambling I was able to play this roulette and like what I'm doing with dice also trying my luck using this method but most of the times I lose because of aggressiveness and greed to win more.

[mindrust]

If you are ready to spend the money you got it doesn't matter whether you do martingale or single bet. Actually you have less chances of winning with martingale. Because there is house edge. The more you play, it makes you closer to lose everything. Just do a single bet take the risk you are willing to take and do it. We gamble to see if we are lucky or not. Why torture ourselves? All in and be done.

[wuvdoll]

You can have the best strategy in the whole world. You can create a place where losing is a slim chance and rare. However whatever you do, in the end because of the house edge the house always wins. Learn this before you get in the gambling business, never assume you will win, never expect profit, never imagine a lambo on your door thanks to gambling. If you do, you will get upset when the house edge caught up with you. On martingale for example, I have seen 17 losses in a row, 17 IN A ROW. It happens, rare but it happens. Hence no matter how many strategy you have, losses will catch up with you.