Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2018, 09:55:35 PM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: banned Nafis1997  (Read 82 times)
Baggio
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 17, 2018, 04:19:56 PM
 #1

Hello admins and all. I was banned and I do not know the reason... in the list of bans under my name are not present. the name of the banned Nafis1997. please unban me. I put my heart into this account(
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
Make a difference with your Ether.
Donate Ether for the greater good.
SPRING.WETRUST.IO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
1537912535
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537912535

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537912535
Reply with quote  #2

1537912535
Report to moderator
nkampala
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 58


View Profile
August 17, 2018, 04:26:17 PM
 #2

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4852987.0

You plagiarized. Literally someone commented on your post saying it

Like and Merit .Thanks

are you serious? you copied something from here: https://www.coindesk.com/information/what-is-the-lightning-network/ and pasted it here without even mentioning the source and you are begging for merit?
you will be banned soon based on your post history! since this is not the only thing you are copy pasting...
AdolfinWolf
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 591


-- “We are the biological bootloader for AI”


View Profile
August 17, 2018, 04:31:40 PM
Merited by xandry (1)
 #3

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4852987.0
you plagiarized. Literally someone commented on your post saying it


Yup, almost all of his posts are plagiarized.

Here is another one,

A federal court judge in California has blocked a move that sought to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging that the initial coin offering (ICO) conducted by the Tezos Foundation violated securities laws in the U.S.

The decision came Tuesday, as District Judge Richard Seeborg denied the motion filed by the Tezos Foundation and the cryptocurrency's founding couple Arthur and Kathleen Brietman, as well as their U.S.-based company Dynamic Ledger Solutions (DLS).

As previously reported, the Tezos Foundation and DLS were facing four class action lawsuits following their ICO that raised $232 million in 2017 and was later accused of selling unregistered securities to investors in the U.S.

Based on the docket report of one case, dubbed "In Re Tezos Securities Litigations," the class action lawsuits have now been consolidated into one with a lead plaintiff named Arman Anvari.

According to the judge's order, the Brietmans argued in the motion that the ICO was administrated by the Tezos Foundation which is based in Switzerland and, as such, the couple and DLS should not be held liable.

However, the judge said the involvement of DLS "in establishing and aiding the Tezos Foundation rendered the two entities deeply intertwined, if not functionally interchangeable, throughout the ICO process."

The defendants also argued as part of the motion for dismissal that the lawsuits were trying to use U.S. securities laws to govern an ICO for which "critical aspects of the sale occurred outside of the United States."

The judge responded in the order that the realities of the ICO transactions "belie" such a conclusion, arguing:

"Anvari participated in the transaction from this country (the U.S). He did so by using an interactive website that was: (a) hosted on a server in Arizona and; (b) run primarily by Arthur Breitman in California. He presumably learned about the ICO and participated in response to marketing that almost exclusively targeted United States residents."

Separately, the court granted the motion and dismissed cryptocurrency brokerage firm Bitcoin Suisse as a defendant, saying that "in any event, Bitcoin Suisse does not appear to be a key player in this action."


you can thank merit)

Copied from https://www.coindesk.com/tezos-ico-class-action-looms-after-motion-to-dismiss-denied/

Also, you're merit begging extremely hard. I'm not sure if that's bannable but it sure as hell isn't endorsed.

I see you're already posting in other sections under this account, which means you're breaking the rules against ban evasion.

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]

I doubt that it'll take long before this account is banned aswell.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!