Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 09:08:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How viable is Bitcoin with Satoshi + MtGox theif holding 2 Million BTC?  (Read 1075 times)
integrity42 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 08:52:01 PM
 #1

It seems that the Gini co-efficient would be outrageously high for Bitcoin to succeed if 10% of coins really are in the hands of two entities.

It seems like there will be opportunity for other alt-coins to market themselves as more 'fairly' distribted and take some market share from Bitcoin.

DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 08:53:43 PM
 #2

Why would you assume the thief is still holding.  I think there are a lot of holes to MtGox's story but they claim they were losing coins for YEARS.  It wasn't like all coins accounted for, single 800,000+ BTC tx and all coins are lost.  Thief may have exchanged, or spent some or all of those coins months ago.
Vitamin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 09:06:48 PM
 #3

That Mark stole 744k BTC is not necessarily what happened, but one interpretation of the very limited facts that have been provided for us.
whtchocla7e
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 116


Worlds Simplest Cryptocurrency Wallet


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 09:13:11 PM
 #4

The fact that one exchange holds close to 1 million or 1/21 of all BTC is scary in itself.

But hey, don't let people tell you that Bitcoin is centralized.

Quote
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▅▆█ L E A D █▆▅▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
World's Simplest and Safest Decentralized Cryptocurrency Wallet!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ • STORE • SEND • SPEND • SWAP • STAKE • ▬▬▬▬▬▬
kolev
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10

My name is Nikolay and am a webaholic.


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 09:19:50 PM
 #5

The fact that one exchange holds close to 1 million or 1/21 of all BTC is scary in itself.

But hey, don't let people tell you that Bitcoin is centralized.
Bitcoin should stick to its promise - decentralization. P2P + Ripple for fiat onramp/offramp is the only solid solution. This will remove speculators from the picture as they won't be able to conduct High-Frequency Trading and will keep large investors off the market, too, as it won't be so easy for them to acquire large amounts of bitcoins.

Bitrated user: nikolay.
acoindr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 09:23:51 PM
 #6

DeathAndTaxes is right but you do have a point that concern over unfair Bitcoin distribution is a recurring theme.

I've often promoted Litecoin as providing strength to cryptocurrency overall by offering things Bitcoin simply can't. A desirable alternative to Bitcoin is one of those things. This issue could be a second.

Litecoin was distributed in a far more balanced way. Not only was it not announced with only a handful of people that could realistically participate, but the launch date was voted for democratically. At least thousands of people heard of it and no pre-mining occurred. Even long after launch while Bitcoin was around $12, Litecoin remained $0.04 cents. Even today with Bitcoin at hundreds of dollars Litecoin is less than $14.00. Yet Litecoin is the oldest, most successful cryptocurrency that is not Bitcoin.

Markets like choices, so as I often explain, it's possible to believe in both Bitcoin and Litecoin at the same time.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!