ICO's success is just getting listed in an exchange or more than it?

[PravinS1857]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

[Zwei]

I say you are in the wrong section, move your topic to Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Altcoin Discussion
The "move topic" button is located on bottom left of your page.

[nkampala]

Being listed on an exchange means nothing if the project is shit. The coin needs to be practical, have a good purpose, the project needs to be sustainable for the future, and there needs to be a user base for it. Many ICOs lack one or more, and that's why you see lots of coins/tokens get dumped once it hits an exchange.

[santosmichael]

I say no too, some ICO prices will rise before it listed on great exchange, and maybe you dont need to sell your ICO until it get listed, but its your turn to take profit from selling your ICO now from the current exchange, because once they hit the great exchange, usually many dumper will dump their coin.

[jossiel]

I say you are in the wrong section, move your topic to Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Altcoin Discussion
The "move topic" button is located on bottom left of your page.

Many threads here seem to be in the wrong section.

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

Being listed to an exchange is just part of their plan and its the start to their success. You can't say that a project is already success by just being listed on an exchange. There must be a continuous progress on what they have been promoting before.

[priscadavids]

No.. But I think successfully carrying out projects as stated on their road map.

[Koadharber]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

Getting listed is just an initial success and also come to think off that not all coin value would able to achieve that ICO price easily where it would always come to a point where they do really dump out and going back to recovery would really takes time depending on the demand of such coin or project. If they do able to pump up then its considered success but the thing i do most view out is that if a project do able to give out on what they do had promised since from the start.

[slightmoon]

ICO successful means just sale of coin not the project successful. After all ICO or coin listing just initial part of any project. Project successful when it generates good revenue with some short of time period not just for some time and it should be regular. After all it's all about money that's why I consider revenue part most despite ICO successful and Project Successful much difference.

[Slimztee]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

Getting listed on an exchange is part of the goal of an ICO. A quick check through their roadmap will show that they plan to list on exchange on specified dates. Achieving that is a success on the part of the project. Whether or not the token does well at the exchange is a different ball game.

[Velkro]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase

Maybe people starting realizing ICO is just copy-paste of bitcoin with less or more imiginary modifications.
Where is value in that?

[ogabonny]

The success or failure of an ICO should not start or end with listing on exchange, the road map has to be achieved, product developed and deployed. listing on exchange is meant to onboard new investors

[Ilmiyati]

Of course more than that, if the ICO with successful sales, of course they can maximize the development of their projects in real terms. even listing in a number of large markets that can push up the price of their tokens / coins significantly. and they can also run the roadmap more smoothly. but some developers actually cheat, they only want personal benefits, still be careful in choosing ico

[fitzzz]

Listing on exchanges is the beginning of any ICO after its token sale. Its attract more investor when listed to several exchanges. But the success of the ICO depends when project meets their promised work. And when the investor  also received stable revenue from the company that they have invested.

[TimeTeller]

Being listed on an exchange means nothing if the project is shit. The coin needs to be practical, have a good purpose, the project needs to be sustainable for the future, and there needs to be a user base for it. Many ICOs lack one or more, and that's why you see lots of coins/tokens get dumped once it hits an exchange.

It's more than that. Many crap coins are being listed in an exchange everyday.
So being listed is not by any means a measure of success of a project.
You are right that a coin should have a purpose and should gain consumers that will really utilize the coin.
Without application in the market, the coin is basically dead or will end up in trading only, up until the value declines and be abandoned by traders.
You can really tell that a certain project is bound to success if they have good progress, that they can deliver results based from their roadmap, that they have partners to make their project a reality, their dev team is active and has good communication with the community.
Actually there's more, but the bottomline is, they should have a large consumer base or user base. Without consumers, the project will go nowhere.

[biochem123]

Of course not, unless they have a working product the project isn't successful - everything else is just fuel for pump and dump schemes

[Endikadija]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

That depends on the exchange site most of coins have listed on the major exchange site get a lot of increase on its price and you can see that how QKC has been trading more than 5x from its ico price caused by it's been listed on the binance exchange site. The hype of the project will give a lot of impacts too.

[vrabac68]

There are still some good projects . I like MUST PLATFORM. The MUST platform is an ecosystem of services for digitization, tokenization, management, trading of assets and financial instruments of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises. The real-time monitoring of the current state of assets provides smart investors with reliable information necessary for making a decision on investing in an asset.

[sabine80]

I have participated in many legit ICOs. They got listed in best exchanges but the value did not even increase even to the core of ICO price set. Do you consider getting listed is thier success. I say no. Yours?

i think that is part of a good project to get to listed on a big exchange, but that does not guarantee success. especially in the current market situation, it is difficult for every token to grow in price. we have to wait for the next big price increase, then maybe the price of many tokens will increase again.

[juljon18]

No.  For me personally the exchange has nothing to do with the success.  The success if when the project creates what it set out to do in it's white paper and has hopefully benefited the crypto community with their project.  The exchanges will come automatically once the project is shown to be legit and successful.

[vit05]

You should put the list of ICO that you have participated. The idea of legitimated could be totally different. But mostly of great projects are still given a great ROI. The problem is that we have many that do not offer anything. It is just a paper and ERC20 token. SO, they could be listed in many exchanges but as they do not offer anything relevant, they will be killed really soon.

What I have recently discovered, is that many Exchanges put a minimal listed day. So on Binance is something like 130 days. The coin will be there for 130 days, if they do not offer great volume or appears to be something useful, it will be delisted.