Win-win bets strategy in roulette

[rolleth.io]

Hey, guys! I want to discuss with you strategies that you use in roulette and tell a little more about win-win bets strategy. It is not intended for bets on equal chances, but for bets on a dozen or a column. It is based on the same principle as all progressive strategies – in case of losing the bet must be increased, in case of winning – leave unchanged.

The sequence of bets for the system is as follows:

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 6 – 9 – 13 – 20 – 30 – 45 – 67 – 100

In other words, if you bet all the time on the first column, and falls, for example, the number of the second or third column, you must first increase the rate to 2, then – to 3, to 4 and so on, following the above sequence.

This system of win-win rates compared to the Martingale system has one undoubted advantage: the size of the rate increases gradually, and does not double every time, so you can use it even when your budget is limited.

This system has an alternative option for bets on two columns or a dozen at once – the so-called system of triple bets. In this case, you bet on two dozen or two columns at once, similarly increasing the bet in case of loss-but three times:

1 - 3 - 9 - 27 - 81 - 243

Following this strategy, you can "close" just half of all the sectors present on the roulette wheel, so that will win more than half of the bets. And the disadvantage of the system is that the bets are tripled every time you lose, and thus the player very quickly reaches the limit of bets set in the online casino.

Let's discuss!

[shanem]

I don't think any strategy can work in roulette. The odds are always against you no matter what strategy you use because of the additional zero on the wheel. This is depending on your luck and you could keep losing if your luck is bad.

[Indrawan77]

This is the second time I heard this kind of strategy, the first time I heard this strategy is from youtube, I kind of doubt that it will works, in the long term of course we won't able to beat the house but short time it probably could work because the winning percentage is more than 60% , but one problem that caught my eyes is the capital is too big and make me rethink that it is wise to bet so big to get so little reward

[Don Pedro Dinero]

That’s a lose-lose strategy, as any other “strategy” that tries to beat the house. At some point someone is going to make a bit of money, due to variance in the short-term, the same as in martingale but in the long term the house always wins.

[nydiacaskey01]

So this strategy can beat the law of gravity? It can predict where the ball will fall next? If this strategy really works how come I haven't heard of multiple winners in roulette by using this strategy. You can't simply predict where the ball will fall. Its a game of chance and pure luck unless you are part of Oceans group.

[XxGaMblerxX]

I don't think any strategy can work in roulette. The odds are always against you no matter what strategy you use because of the additional zero on the wheel. This is depending on your luck and you could keep losing if your luck is bad.

I usually stick to the exit strategy if I'm unlucky or I've reached the spending limit.

[XxGaMblerxX]

So this strategy can beat the law of gravity? It can predict where the ball will fall next? If this strategy really works how come I haven't heard of multiple winners in roulette by using this strategy. You can't simply predict where the ball will fall. Its a game of chance and pure luck unless you are part of Oceans group.

I think we should stick to the strategy of observing and finding patterns first, and then create our own strategy.

[Sam Johns]

That’s a lose-lose strategy, as any other “strategy” that tries to beat the house. At some point someone is going to make a bit of money, due to variance in the short-term, the same as in martingale but in the long term the house always wins.

In my experience, the martingale system did not give a great result in the long term, too. Sometimes zero worked, but more often I try to look at how the algorithm works and make decisions based on this.

[BossMacko]

Having strategy will only make you last long. Win win strategy won't happen if it is they won't continue to provide you the game. Roullete is base on luck best win win strategy for me is to get out of the game whenever you are already winning.

[rolleth.io]

Having strategy will only make you last long. Win win strategy won't happen if it is they won't continue to provide you the game. Roullete is base on luck best win win strategy for me is to get out of the game whenever you are already winning.

Very interesting opinion! Do you use anything to increase your chances of winning?

[btcdevil]

Having strategy will only make you last long. Win win strategy won't happen if it is they won't continue to provide you the game. Roullete is base on luck best win win strategy for me is to get out of the game whenever you are already winning.

What you said is not only for roullete but it impliance for even other gambling games also as when you have won some games then better leave it for that day and start betting next day. As often i have seen players first winning good but after some bets their badluck starts and even on good cards they lose it and in the end endup in empty the bankroll.

[kripkiki12]

I wonder if real life casinos tolerate the strategies. Me personally, I do not trust in online casinos when it comes to roulette, but it is never in favor of the player

[swogerino]

I wonder if real life casinos tolerate the strategies. Me personally, I do not trust in online casinos when it comes to roulette, but it is never in favor of the player

That is true because the online casinos can even roll 100 times red which is impossible in real life. If you bet 100 times on red in real life you will certainly win a bet but you need Martingale to be profitable here and offline casinos have betting limits, you can't bet more than a certain amount for a bet.

Roulette can easily be beaten with Martingale if we had a lot of money and the offline casino would let us bet any amount of money for a bet. The offline casinos know this so they have put betting limits.

You can not have a win-win strategy in roulette as you are playing against a game of luck.

[babygun]

Hey, guys! I want to discuss with you strategies that you use in roulette and tell a little more about win-win bets strategy. It is not intended for bets on equal chances, but for bets on a dozen or a column. It is based on the same principle as all progressive strategies – in case of losing the bet must be increased, in case of winning – leave unchanged.

The sequence of bets for the system is as follows:

1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 6 – 9 – 13 – 20 – 30 – 45 – 67 – 100

In other words, if you bet all the time on the first column, and falls, for example, the number of the second or third column, you must first increase the rate to 2, then – to 3, to 4 and so on, following the above sequence.

This system of win-win rates compared to the Martingale system has one undoubted advantage: the size of the rate increases gradually, and does not double every time, so you can use it even when your budget is limited.

This system has an alternative option for bets on two columns or a dozen at once – the so-called system of triple bets. In this case, you bet on two dozen or two columns at once, similarly increasing the bet in case of loss-but three times:

1 - 3 - 9 - 27 - 81 - 243

Following this strategy, you can "close" just half of all the sectors present on the roulette wheel, so that will win more than half of the bets. And the disadvantage of the system is that the bets are tripled every time you lose, and thus the player very quickly reaches the limit of bets set in the online casino.

Let's discuss!

This is just another variant on Martingale. In the long end this will not be profitable, such as any Martingale strategy.

[mindrust]

Don't be a retard. If there was a win-win strategy on any game, the house wouldn't exist.

The best chance for you to make money is going all in on one game. %50 winning chance is fine. You'll be getting %98-99 because of the house edge but it is still ok. Just flip a coin and see if you are lucky. That's all about gambling especially when it comes to the games like roulette and dice.

All you need is pure luck and nothing else.

If you are afraid to go all in, (and you should) then doing complicated sequences doesn't make sense even more. Because of the house edge the longer you play the more certain it becomes for you to lose money. The only situation you can get away with it is going all in.

[kryptqnick]

Hey, guys! I want to discuss with you strategies that you use in roulette and tell a little more about win-win bets strategy. It is not intended for bets on equal chances, but for bets on a dozen or a column. It is based on the same principle as all progressive strategies – in case of losing the bet must be increased, in case of winning – leave unchanged.

This is a basic principle of martingale, a naturally appealing but very risky betting strategy, usually used for dice with 50/50 chances. The thing is that even with a 1/2 probability of winning sometimes the wrong thing comes out 5 or even 10 times in a row. As a person is losing, the bet is being doubled, so losses come extremely fast and eventually huge amounts of money are lost with no funds to compensate them. It keeps looking like the next bet will change everything and at least compensate all the losses, and a gambler doesn't even realize how much money is lost already. I don't believe there's any strategy to win roulette. It's a game of pure chance.

[chris200x9]

I wonder if real life casinos tolerate the strategies. Me personally, I do not trust in online casinos when it comes to roulette, but it is never in favor of the player

If you think logically then you will understand that casino owners are doing a business so they expect a profit from their investment and time on these house setup. So surely players got a less chance to win. Some addicted gamblers will keep on thinking about new methods to win against a house to make an easy money but that will never happen unless they are lucky.

[sportbettor]

List of the most popular Betting Strategies can be found here: http://sportstatist.com/category/betting-strategies/

[el kaka22]

I am still shocked and surprised every single time someone comes up and says they found a way to win in gambling.
There is no way of winning on gambling because you are playing against a house edge that tips the advantage towards the casino itself.

Because of the zero on the roll there is no way you are at an advantage while gambling on roulette, you can try any strategy you want and you can bet however weirdly you want but in the end house always wins on the long run because there is a house edge. You need to find a place with negative house edge to find a winning strategy and that just doesn't exists at all.

[squatz1]

I am still shocked and surprised every single time someone comes up and says they found a way to win in gambling.
There is no way of winning on gambling because you are playing against a house edge that tips the advantage towards the casino itself.

Because of the zero on the roll there is no way you are at an advantage while gambling on roulette, you can try any strategy you want and you can bet however weirdly you want but in the end house always wins on the long run because there is a house edge. You need to find a place with negative house edge to find a winning strategy and that just doesn't exists at all.

It's the mind of a gambler, they want to be able to convince themselves that they've found out the way to win -- and in their mind, it is the way to win, while they're winning at least. Sadly enough all of this will end at a certain point, and all of it will come crashing down on them when they lose it all.

This is a cycle where these people keep trying to crack the code -- though they don't understand that the code they're trying to crack is a code which is set up to beat them.