ANN-EMC2 Einsteinium FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY KMD-dPoW

[PEG-TOKEN]

I had loads of EMC2 on poloniex when it was first listed.. Logged in today to see 0 balance...
No history in withdraw or logs...

Awaiting answer from poloniex on this matter...

Good luck regarding your issue. My experience with Poloniex have been very good so far.

So far I have had nothing but problems there.  I hold some hope I will get back my EMC2

[OWZ1337]

0.60$ LOL

RIP

It's coming back already. $0.66 Boom.   

*Irony 

Nahh $0.78 Boom

greed is good weee

[JoeMaaa]

I agree that this wasn't "mind blowing" as the Einsteinium team was promoting...very unprofessional. However, this announcement is not that bad after all, it was not a short term announcement but more likely long term where I believe that people who keep will see some recognizable gain in an year.

Most people are in crypto for getting rich very quick so people complain about this announcement. I mean cmon guys, I bought 1100 EMC2 coins @ 0.02$, don't want to brag but if you do the math thats about 22$ investing in this currency, if I would have withdrawn a week ago I would have over 2200$ but I didn't. But do I care? Definitely not. I believe this coin is not going to go under 0.02$ anyway, so I will still be plus, and REALLY putting 20$ into it definitely does not bother me losing, if you can't afford losing(which you wont anyway) such a small amount then you shouldn't be investing AT ALL! I will just wait until it hits something higher than 3$ just because these announcements are just not THAT bad for long term investment. If you bought it high, I would recommend to HOLD as well!

[CrytpoGod27]

RIP EMC2..... Jesus investors who bought at the top got completely wiped out.

[burnum]

RIP EMC2..... Jesus investors who bought at the top got completely wiped out.

I bought at the top, and although a panic hit me as it tumbled I continued to hold, which is what everyone who went off the cliff should have done, now I just keep holding even as bitcoin found a cliff of its own, blood everywhere and what am I going to do? Hold, I am going to hold because I decided it could go either way once it peaked, it dropped but not really bad enough to warrant selling off I think I bought some more at cheap - would have to look - , reminds me of other coins that peaked and fell and peaked and fell so now that I can't profit the only thing I wish is that I had been able to wait until after the GPU mining began, but who knew that was going to come around?

Bring on more FUD haters! I like it!

[Goldsheik]

I told you a week ago that this is a bad scamcoin. You didn't listen. You still won't listen because you're idiots.. I'm an actual scientist like I said in my previous posts and I'm telling you, anyone with half a brain can tell this coin is BAD.

1. This coin doesn't offer anything. It's based on the idea that we collect money to scientific projects. That's it. It's a normal benefit fund that doesn't even need to be in cryptocurrency form. Ask yourself, is this a better payment method for the future than Litecoin, Dash or Monero for example? Does it offer new functionalities like Ethereum, ARK, BAT and so many others? No.

2. Even the name is bad. The team is bad. The partnership teams are bad.  Einsteinium is already the name for an element. Why choose a name that is already taken?  The team doesn't even consist of scientists. The partnership teams are not scientific groups.

3. The rise from #150 to #50 was a pump and dump. Now it's going down after you guys are done funding somebody's Lamborghini.

4. The price went up partially because the devs promised "amazing news". This of course was just an attempt to make you spend more money on this coin. So easy to trick money from you. Just a few words.

[CryptoGir]

1. This coin doesn't offer anything. It's based on the idea that we collect money to scientific projects. That's it. It's a normal benefit fund that doesn't even need to be in cryptocurrency form. Ask yourself, is this a better payment method for the future than Litecoin, Dash or Monero for example? Does it offer new functionalities like Ethereum, ARK, BAT and so many others? No.

Nah, that part is a decent idea. Basically building of community to fund science, not a bad approach. Other parts stand true, though.

[Goldsheik]

Nah, that part is a decent idea. Basically building of community to fund science, not a bad approach. Other parts stand true, though.

Well, as a young, aspiring physicist I have to agree! Countries like the USA spend way too much money on war and other stuff when we could develop science just by funding it. This is a problem that is known to many such as Bill Nye.

I'm not complaining about funding science, I'm skeptical about using a cryptocoin to do it - and how the money will be distributed. So basically I'm thinking people use this coin to make themselves rich, that's what they care about, not science. Today anyone can make a coin with a new idea and get filthy rich.

[prowe]

1. blabla

2. blabla

3. blabla

4. blabla

Goldsheik wants to buy at the dip.  

Thanks for your opinion sir, you already posted this 5+ times in the past within the EMC2 thread.

Perhaps become happy again instead of a sour grape, lol.

You might have a good heart but being this repetitive is quite sad.

You don't have to be a fan of EMC2, isn't there a thread where you can post some hapiness?  

Show some love man!

[PEG-TOKEN]

I told you a week ago that this is a bad scamcoin. You didn't listen. You still won't listen because you're idiots.. I'm an actual scientist like I said in my previous posts and I'm telling you, anyone with half a brain can tell this coin is BAD.

1. This coin doesn't offer anything. It's based on the idea that we collect money to scientific projects. That's it. It's a normal benefit fund that doesn't even need to be in cryptocurrency form. Ask yourself, is this a better payment method for the future than Litecoin, Dash or Monero for example? Does it offer new functionalities like Ethereum, ARK, BAT and so many others? No.

2. Even the name is bad. The team is bad. The partnership teams are bad.  Einsteinium is already the name for an element. Why choose a name that is already taken?  The team doesn't even consist of scientists. The partnership teams are not scientific groups.

3. The rise from #150 to #50 was a pump and dump. Now it's going down after you guys are done funding somebody's Lamborghini.

4. The price went up partially because the devs promised "amazing news". This of course was just an attempt to make you spend more money on this coin. So easy to trick money from you. Just a few words.

You don't need to support it if you do not like the dev's or the project.

I do not agree with some of what you say there is no coin on the market (including bitcoin) that do not suffer from pump and dump.
Smart people use this as opportunity. Dumb people panic and lose out.
Some coins take a long time to come to fruition I think we have yet to see this coin properly take off.

I do hold some EMC2 and have done since it was first listed on the Poloniex exchange.

The idea to move back to GPU mine is a good choice not only for the coin but for the environment we really need to see a move away from ASIC based mining if we want to make sure crypto is not blamed for the ever more polluted world we live in.

[oskuro83]

0.60$ LOL

RIP

It's coming back already. $0.66 Boom.   

*Irony 

Nahh $0.78 Boom

NASA? Boom

[vredinka43]

EMC2 - scammers. I no longer believe. and I will always write information about them that they are scammers.

[CrytpoGod27]

COMPLETELY REKT!!!!!

[Janaj]

This is one of my most favorite funny threads 

[Goldsheik]

Show some love man!

Dude I'm trying to protect your money... 

The NASA thing, for example, was just a photoshopped image.. There is no NASA collaboration.

[marvel213]

lol

All these coins will die in the end unless they get sponsored or partnership.  There's thousands of these new cryptocurrency.  EMC2 is no different.

[prowe]

Show some love man!

Dude I'm trying to protect your money...  

The NASA thing, for example, was just a photoshopped image.. There is no NASA collaboration.

Yes we already know the announcement wasn't regarding a collaboration with Apple or NASA, no worries.

Who knows what the future will bring.  

A strong community can make the difference, more transparancy, commitment and dedication.

The technical developments will absolutely conribute to EMC2.

Lots of potential for positive people.

Cryptohug 

[PEG-TOKEN]

There may be many out there and its everyones personal choice to support or leave a project.
I hope EMC2 can grow and we can see some progress.

[The Zet]

I told you a week ago that this is a bad scamcoin. You didn't listen. You still won't listen because you're idiots.. I'm an actual scientist like I said in my previous posts and I'm telling you, anyone with half a brain can tell this coin is BAD.

1. This coin doesn't offer anything. It's based on the idea that we collect money to scientific projects. That's it. It's a normal benefit fund that doesn't even need to be in cryptocurrency form. Ask yourself, is this a better payment method for the future than Litecoin, Dash or Monero for example? Does it offer new functionalities like Ethereum, ARK, BAT and so many others? No.

2. Even the name is bad. The team is bad. The partnership teams are bad.  Einsteinium is already the name for an element. Why choose a name that is already taken?  The team doesn't even consist of scientists. The partnership teams are not scientific groups.

3. The rise from #150 to #50 was a pump and dump. Now it's going down after you guys are done funding somebody's Lamborghini.

4. The price went up partially because the devs promised "amazing news". This of course was just an attempt to make you spend more money on this coin. So easy to trick money from you. Just a few words.

I wouldn't mind responding to you since you're proven FUDster, but for the sake of other people, it would be bad if your lies remained unanswered.

1. It actually does. By your logic, none cryptocurrency shouldn't exist, since all the thing they advocate, are already in use. Why using cryptos, if we already have banks, for example?...

2. Respectfully, that is only your opinion. Nothing more. You may like coin's name, or not, but it's very egocentric to force your opinion as valid. Personally, I find science-related coin named Einsteinium, with the EMC2 ticker, quite witty. The team is excellent. Everything they've done so far was good for coins development. Why, on earth, would presence of scientist, be important at this stage of the project? I assume they (will) consult some scientist, but that is not crucial at this point. What input could a scientist have on the development of mobile wallet, for example? See my point? Imho, scientific groups shouldn't ever be "partnership team". It's fine to have the logistic support of some college, but partnership should be made with a company that would improve EMC2's position through a technical upgrade.

3/4. The rise was due to scheduled HF. Since BTC/BCH fork this August, forks became new ICO's. Hence all the hype.
I agree though, they shouldn't use "mind-blowing" description for the announcement. Being tech guy myself, I agree that announcement was huge eventually, but for regular investors, a far bigger thing would be if the Emc2 logo could be seen on the Formula 1 car (or any other fancy but easily pointless thing). All the hype was created by investors themselves. Even Djnocide commented on Telegram, that EMC2/NASA partnership logo is bad photoshop. Not to mention denial of Apple rumors...

Whoever had even remote trading experience, knew what to expect before the fork, after the fork and after the announcement. Regarding an announcement, I sold it at 13.5k. I regret only I bought little under 8k. I underestimated weak hands...

[PEG-TOKEN]

I told you a week ago that this is a bad scamcoin. You didn't listen. You still won't listen because you're idiots.. I'm an actual scientist like I said in my previous posts and I'm telling you, anyone with half a brain can tell this coin is BAD.

1. This coin doesn't offer anything. It's based on the idea that we collect money to scientific projects. That's it. It's a normal benefit fund that doesn't even need to be in cryptocurrency form. Ask yourself, is this a better payment method for the future than Litecoin, Dash or Monero for example? Does it offer new functionalities like Ethereum, ARK, BAT and so many others? No.

2. Even the name is bad. The team is bad. The partnership teams are bad.  Einsteinium is already the name for an element. Why choose a name that is already taken?  The team doesn't even consist of scientists. The partnership teams are not scientific groups.

3. The rise from #150 to #50 was a pump and dump. Now it's going down after you guys are done funding somebody's Lamborghini.

4. The price went up partially because the devs promised "amazing news". This of course was just an attempt to make you spend more money on this coin. So easy to trick money from you. Just a few words.

I wouldn't mind responding to you since you're proven FUDster, but for the sake of other people, it would be bad if your lies remained unanswered.

1. It actually does. By your logic, none cryptocurrency shouldn't exist, since all the thing they advocate, are already in use. Why using cryptos, if we already have banks, for example?...

2. Respectfully, that is only your opinion. Nothing more. You may like coin's name, or not, but it's very egocentric to force your opinion as valid. Personally, I find science-related coin named Einsteinium, with the EMC2 ticker, quite witty. The team is excellent. Everything they've done so far was good for coins development. Why, on earth, would presence of scientist, be important at this stage of the project? I assume they (will) consult some scientist, but that is not crucial at this point. What input could a scientist have on the development of mobile wallet, for example? See my point? Imho, scientific groups shouldn't ever be "partnership team". It's fine to have the logistic support of some college, but partnership should be made with a company that would improve EMC2's position through a technical upgrade.

3/4. The rise was due to scheduled HF. Since BTC/BCH fork this August, forks became new ICO's. Hence all the hype.
I agree though, they shouldn't use "mind-blowing" description for the announcement. Being tech guy myself, I agree that announcement was huge eventually, but for regular investors, a far bigger thing would be if the Emc2 logo could be seen on the Formula 1 car (or any other fancy but easily pointless thing). All the hype was created by investors themselves. Even Djnocide commented on Telegram, that EMC2/NASA partnership logo is bad photoshop. Not to mention denial of Apple rumors...

Whoever had even remote trading experience, knew what to expect before the fork, after the fork and after the announcement. Regarding an announcement, I sold it at 13.5k. I regret only I bought little under 8k. I underestimated weak hands...

Very constructive answer and I would have to side with you on many of the points you raised.
If people do not fully understand markets they should stop trading.