ANN-EMC2 Einsteinium FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY KMD-dPoW

[The Zet]

lol what a joke, even voxels announced a partnership in their announcement (although they didnt specify what company due to NDA)

and what did EMC2 announce in their 'big announcement'? ASIC resistant algo? hahahaha

and dumbasses still hodling this coin and expect it to recover, you guys got conned hard by the team

Announcement = partnership? Interesting...
I wouldn't be that proud of own ignorance. I can't blame that you/'re won't/can't/not being able to comprehend why algo change is great news, but that's subject to another discussion.
Soon enough, when you see Emc2's price up, remember there are plenty of satisfied "conned dumbasses".

[Goldsheik]

lol what a joke, even voxels announced a partnership in their announcement (although they didnt specify what company due to NDA)

and what did EMC2 announce in their 'big announcement'? ASIC resistant algo? hahahaha

and dumbasses still hodling this coin and expect it to recover, you guys got conned hard by the team

Announcement = partnership? Interesting...
I wouldn't be that proud of own ignorance. I can't blame that you/'re won't/can't/not being able to comprehend why algo change is great news, but that's subject to another discussion.
Soon enough, when you see Emc2's price up, remember there are plenty of satisfied "conned dumbasses".

Einsteinium just sunk back to sub-100 positions on coinmarketcap. Dude it's never coming back up.

[The Zet]

I'm not worried, as long as it haves so many followers. I mean, even I being all for Einsteinium, don't have a need to check coin's position all the time. Thank you for updates. I can see it deeply affects you. Good work!

[quantum1711]

lol what a joke, even voxels announced a partnership in their announcement (although they didnt specify what company due to NDA)

and what did EMC2 announce in their 'big announcement'? ASIC resistant algo? hahahaha

and dumbasses still hodling this coin and expect it to recover, you guys got conned hard by the team

Announcement = partnership? Interesting...
I wouldn't be that proud of own ignorance. I can't blame that you/'re won't/can't/not being able to comprehend why algo change is great news, but that's subject to another discussion.
Soon enough, when you see Emc2's price up, remember there are plenty of satisfied "conned dumbasses".

my point is, if you claim to have a 'big announcement', then make sure you indeed have something big to announce and not some ASIC resistant algo crap, that can be posted in their twitter or social media channel anytime, dont have to hype up the announcement by saying they have a big announcement coming and then frustrate ppl like that

[Goldsheik]

my point is, if you claim to have a 'big announcement', then make sure you indeed have something big to announce and not some ASIC resistant algo crap, that can be posted in their twitter or social media channel anytime, dont have to hype up the announcement by saying they have a big announcement coming and then frustrate ppl like that

The devs were mysterious on purpose, to drive the price up. They knew exactly what they were doing and it pissed me off already in advance.

Crypto markets are so easily manipulated that you can basically get millions by saying "news coming!" on Twitter and people buy your coin just in case.
Remember this.
Most altcoins are nothing but empty promises. They have a dream and a white paper and that's it. We're living in crazy times when people spend thousands of dollars on dreams.

[coldstorage]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

[erk84vr44]

1000 was exactly what i was thinking but if it were 500k i would probably leave

[burnum]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

Masternodes should be reserved for those that are willing to risk high for the coin's future and are willing to be active in securing the future of the network, you should withdraw your request for the lower tier and let those that are truly interested in science get involved in the project,.
Too many speculators now to let everybody host a masternode when this coin has support out of California, as time goes by some people might let the rest of the network take care of itself while they pursue other ambitions and then difficulty would run high as nodes fall out making the coin unattractive to new  coin user's, with the new mining algorithm on GPU being center of the coins decentralization of the coin - master nodes ought be run off altogether, the most hash power in the network ought be the master node and forget about the rest as they end up hosting the latest and greatest blockchain purely by solving the complexity of the block info.

[coldstorage]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

Masternodes should be reserved for those that are willing to risk high for the coin's future and are willing to be active in securing the future of the network, you should withdraw your request for the lower tier and let those that are truly interested in science get involved in the project,.
Too many speculators now to let everybody host a masternode when this coin has support out of California, as time goes by some people might let the rest of the network take care of itself while they pursue other ambitions and then difficulty would run high as nodes fall out making the coin unattractive to new  coin user's, with the new mining algorithm on GPU being center of the coins decentralization of the coin - master nodes ought be run off altogether, the most hash power in the network ought be the master node and forget about the rest as they end up hosting the latest and greatest blockchain purely by solving the complexity of the block info.

I would certainly encourage you to request your preferred higher number, but the number they originally suggested is roughly $1 million USD investment.  What stands between most people and that is not true interest in science, it's resources.  Most people I know don't have that much in all their assets combined, much less liquid available for investment.  If you run in wealthier circles, or simply believe it's better for the currency for the super rich to be the only ones with masternodes, more power to you, but I haven't found your argument persuasive, so I'll continue to advocate for a more accessible buy in, which I do believe will make it easier for true believers to support Einsteinium. 

We can both advocate our differing positions, neither of us needs to withdraw our requests.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

Masternodes should be reserved for those that are willing to risk high for the coin's future and are willing to be active in securing the future of the network, you should withdraw your request for the lower tier and let those that are truly interested in science get involved in the project,.
Too many speculators now to let everybody host a masternode when this coin has support out of California, as time goes by some people might let the rest of the network take care of itself while they pursue other ambitions and then difficulty would run high as nodes fall out making the coin unattractive to new  coin user's, with the new mining algorithm on GPU being center of the coins decentralization of the coin - master nodes ought be run off altogether, the most hash power in the network ought be the master node and forget about the rest as they end up hosting the latest and greatest blockchain purely by solving the complexity of the block info.

I would certainly encourage you to request your preferred higher number, but the number they originally suggested is roughly $1 million USD investment.  What stands between most people and that is not true interest in science, it's resources.  Most people I know don't have that much in all their assets combined, much less liquid available for investment.  If you run in wealthier circles, or simply believe it's better for the currency for the super rich to be the only ones with masternodes, more power to you, but I haven't found your argument persuasive, so I'll continue to advocate for a more accessible buy in, which I do believe will make it easier for true believers to support Einsteinium. 

We can both advocate our differing positions, neither of us needs to withdraw our requests.

1 million usd investment to run a masternode is way too high and rediculous If you ask me, I mean how many people can afford that? If the devs aren't wanting to politicize emc2, then they should consider bringing that amount totally down to at least 500, 1000, 5000 or 10000, so more people can be able to get in there by creating much more demand for the coin, $bsd requires 25000 coins to run a masternode and most members of it community still complian its too high, I think emc2 devs want to turn emc2 to dash overnight which might not be the right way to go, I leant dash requires a million usd to run masternode..
We can get there step by step, no need to rush anything

[R-J-F]

My sensation about the disapponted people in this forum is that none of them was here long term, they hoped in the post-announcement pump and were hoping to dump their coins very high. They call it a pump and dump coin because THEY wanted to dump it on someone else but someone did it before them on them.   The fact is that despite of the news of the announcement not being really mind boggling, the news are truly good, things are moving in the right direction for this coin after years of very little happening. Long term, future looks bright for EMC2, but short-term wannabe-dumpers cannot wait more than days or weeks when they buy a coin.

To all the fudders:

I don't see those of us here since '14 calling it PnD. If you don't know what it's all about and, you don't understand what an algorithm change and master nodes can bring to this project then how about you just read for a while and keep your uneducated mouth shut. If you invested recently, you certainly have a right to speak up. If not, go bother some other project.

[OWZ1337]

My sensation about the disapponted people in this forum is that none of them was here long term, they hoped in the post-announcement pump and were hoping to dump their coins very high. They call it a pump and dump coin because THEY wanted to dump it on someone else but someone did it before them on them.   The fact is that despite of the news of the announcement not being really mind boggling, the news are truly good, things are moving in the right direction for this coin after years of very little happening. Long term, future looks bright for EMC2, but short-term wannabe-dumpers cannot wait more than days or weeks when they buy a coin.

To all the fudders:

I don't see those of us here since '14 calling it PnD. If you don't know what it's all about and, you don't understand what an algorithm change and master nodes can bring to this project then how about you just read for a while and keep your uneducated mouth shut. If you invested recently, you certainly have a right to speak up. If not, go bother some other project.

you characters really need to take a lead in this market>>> or this is going nowhere fast simply ann some no name server farm is not propelling us up! :\ meh

[burnum]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

Masternodes should be reserved for those that are willing to risk high for the coin's future and are willing to be active in securing the future of the network, you should withdraw your request for the lower tier and let those that are truly interested in science get involved in the project,.
Too many speculators now to let everybody host a masternode when this coin has support out of California, as time goes by some people might let the rest of the network take care of itself while they pursue other ambitions and then difficulty would run high as nodes fall out making the coin unattractive to new  coin user's, with the new mining algorithm on GPU being center of the coins decentralization of the coin - master nodes ought be run off altogether, the most hash power in the network ought be the master node and forget about the rest as they end up hosting the latest and greatest blockchain purely by solving the complexity of the block info.

I would certainly encourage you to request your preferred higher number, but the number they originally suggested is roughly $1 million USD investment.  What stands between most people and that is not true interest in science, it's resources.  Most people I know don't have that much in all their assets combined, much less liquid available for investment.  If you run in wealthier circles, or simply believe it's better for the currency for the super rich to be the only ones with masternodes, more power to you, but I haven't found your argument persuasive, so I'll continue to advocate for a more accessible buy in, which I do believe will make it easier for true believers to support Einsteinium. 

We can both advocate our differing positions, neither of us needs to withdraw our requests.

1 million usd investment to run a masternode is way too high and rediculous If you ask me, I mean how many people can afford that? If the devs aren't wanting to politicize emc2, then they should consider bringing that amount totally down to at least 500, 1000, 5000 or 10000, so more people can be able to get in there by creating much more demand for the coin, $bsd requires 25000 coins to run a masternode and most members of it community still complian its too high, I think emc2 devs want to turn emc2 to dash overnight which might not be the right way to go, I leant dash requires a million usd to run masternode..
We can get there step by step, no need to rush anything

@500 the USD invest would be $365 to host a masternode, that is the equivalent to a bar tab on a weekend night for many many people, to be serious about securing a network of the current market cap of EMC2 that is over 158 Million USD, the cost to invest and be host of masternode that all can have some faith in should be much more than what a investor is willing to blow on a weekend, the cost should be a little higher than a middle class earner can afford to lose in a year so that the project is taken very seriously and protected against major FUD or highly technical attacks, I do not suggest a 1M requirement but at least it ought to be enough that it is not a light invest, it should also be a sliding scale, when the value of EMC2 is up the required amount should drop as we all know that EMC2 could possibly dip to 20 cents before rising to $20 after sitting at a low for a year or two and so when the value of it is down the required amount should rise, right now I think that for me to believe in masternodes the requirement today should be at the least $86,000 and be subject to a sliding scale that considers the amount of master nodes and cost of EMC2, @ 158M Marketcap I think that the count of masternodes could be in the area of 1500 to 2000 which considering the invest amount is a good number.

[burnum]

Einsteinium is taking community feedback on how much to require if masternodes were adopted.  Their early thoughts were 500k to 1MM EMC2.  I've encouraged them to make it accessible for smaller users, maybe with 500 to 1000 EMC2.  While they're listening (they're actively reading and responding on reddit), please let them know the size of the stake that you think would be beneficial to EMC2, if you've witnessed other currencies' masternodes in action, feel free to use that knowledge as context.

Masternodes should be reserved for those that are willing to risk high for the coin's future and are willing to be active in securing the future of the network, you should withdraw your request for the lower tier and let those that are truly interested in science get involved in the project,.
Too many speculators now to let everybody host a masternode when this coin has support out of California, as time goes by some people might let the rest of the network take care of itself while they pursue other ambitions and then difficulty would run high as nodes fall out making the coin unattractive to new  coin user's, with the new mining algorithm on GPU being center of the coins decentralization of the coin - master nodes ought be run off altogether, the most hash power in the network ought be the master node and forget about the rest as they end up hosting the latest and greatest blockchain purely by solving the complexity of the block info.

I would certainly encourage you to request your preferred higher number, but the number they originally suggested is roughly $1 million USD investment.  What stands between most people and that is not true interest in science, it's resources.  Most people I know don't have that much in all their assets combined, much less liquid available for investment.  If you run in wealthier circles, or simply believe it's better for the currency for the super rich to be the only ones with masternodes, more power to you, but I haven't found your argument persuasive, so I'll continue to advocate for a more accessible buy in, which I do believe will make it easier for true believers to support Einsteinium. 

We can both advocate our differing positions, neither of us needs to withdraw our requests.

1 million usd investment to run a masternode is way too high and rediculous If you ask me, I mean how many people can afford that? If the devs aren't wanting to politicize emc2, then they should consider bringing that amount totally down to at least 500, 1000, 5000 or 10000, so more people can be able to get in there by creating much more demand for the coin, $bsd requires 25000 coins to run a masternode and most members of it community still complian its too high, I think emc2 devs want to turn emc2 to dash overnight which might not be the right way to go, I leant dash requires a million usd to run masternode..
We can get there step by step, no need to rush anything

@500 the USD invest would be $365 to host a masternode, that is the equivalent to a bar tab on a weekend night for many many people, to be serious about securing a network of the current market cap of EMC2 that is over 158 Million USD, the cost to invest and be host of masternode that all can have some faith in should be much more than what a investor is willing to blow on a weekend, the cost should be a little higher than a middle class earner can afford to lose in a year so that the project is taken very seriously and protected against major FUD or highly technical attacks, I do not suggest a 1M requirement but at least it ought to be enough that it is not a light invest, it should also be a sliding scale, when the value of EMC2 is up the required amount should drop as we all know that EMC2 could possibly dip to 20 cents before rising to $20 after sitting at a low for a year or two and so when the value of it is down the required amount should rise, right now I think that for me to believe in masternodes the requirement today should be at the least $86,000 and be subject to a sliding scale that considers the amount of master nodes and cost of EMC2, @ 158M Marketcap I think that the count of masternodes could be in the area of 1500 to 2000 which considering the invest amount is a good number.

And to follow up on the conversation if i must include my own hopes and idea's,.
A very successful system could be incorporated for those that wish to host a masternode but are unable to achieve the accumulation of coin to do so but are not less worthy to host a masternode than the more wealthy.
Those that cannot afford my proposed $86k due to their geographical location or other circumstances could be given opportunity through hosting without benefit for a period of time while holding EMC2 without sending and then enter into the network as masternode after meeting requirements of a program built  for such interested parties, this particular option would promote the network to all corners of the globe.

Just do it. 

[j4y_naKomodo]

Hello Einsteinium community,

Einsteinium is available for atomic swap trading on Komodo Platform's BarterDEX! Right NOW, peer2peer, on Mainnet with live orderbooks. Anyone can test it out if you'd like. We are taking privacy to new heights by keeping your funds and privkeys in YOUR HANDS! zK-SNARK coin Jumblr in YOUR HANDS! Liquidity of each coin is still building, but BarterDEX can pair your coin with any other of the 80+ coins on the exchange. If a team member, perhaps someone from marketing, would like to test out an atomic swap through our GUI, please send me a DM : ) We have a team availabe for walking leaders of featured coins through the Komodo ecosystem to teach you how your community can benefit from BarterDEX!

This is truly a community project - the keys are now in your hands! YOU can be a marketmaker for your coin, making it available to BarterDEX users around the globe 24/7. YOU can create an SPV electrum server, allowing BarterDEX users to manage and trade your coin without downloading the entire blockchain. We would be happy to assist you with setting these up. It would be nice to have your coin paired with KMD - then we could introduce it to the community as having liquidity in BarterDEX!

Welcome to the BarterDEX decentralized exchange!

Trade freely and safely,
Jay

[danbcn]

Time to buy!

[burnum]

Time to buy!

Wait 24 hours

[caoboinhacso]

It is a potential coin. I'll think about it

[Goldsheik]

From #30 --> #113

Just like I predicted. Now I say it's going to #150 within 2 weeks.

[pekacoin]

From #30 --> #113

Just like I predicted. Now I say it's going to #150 within 2 weeks.

This stock exchange sells coins for market manipulation.  
Begin to deduce coins on wallets

Developers where your news is
Why do not you answer, you have a lot of people on the team, where are the messages from the developers?