Not to be negative, but I think in real terms the model makes no sense whatsoever. There's no way to distribute the coins fairly to citizens without A. being wide open to fraud, or B. incurring an infeasibly massive overhead in terms of man-hours to validate the identities of claimants. Auroracoin will sink when people start to think through the logistics and realise it's not possible.
As much as I share the sentiment of doing good for the less fortunate, there are far more practical & beneficial ways to go about it. Throwing money at the poverty problem has never worked historically and introduces additional problems like power imbalances, corruption, and devaluing existing local markets.
This is not "free" money: it's given out by the community with the purpose of increasing crypto publicity and adoption.
Validation is not unfeasible, u only need to have some kind of anagraphic database, as auroracoin have. Of course someone will try to abuse the system, but there are many ways (i.e. you can spread money beetween poor people simply by giving paper wallets to some trusted charity, they would be glad to distribute them)
