A good investment option? ICO's pitched on a PRODUCT, not a White Paper

[Benarand]

Of course, it is better to invest in a project with a work product, for development and improvement of which the means are collected, than to invest simply in a good idea, which is not confirmed by anything.

[FinanceX]

Stay safe. Invest in a product

[blockchain-man]

Of course, it is better to invest in a project with a work product, for development and improvement of which the means are collected, than to invest simply in a good idea, which is not confirmed by anything.

I agree! I would choose to invest in a project that has a product rather than an idea. But sometimes, the idea becomes real and powerful in the near future.

[FinanceX]

Can anyone share their experiences investing in ICO's, product or no product 

[piaomar]

there are several criteria for choosing an ico, we can start by looking at the whitepaper. besides, I think if ico already has a product it will be more convincing for investors because the prospects are good for the future. the most important thing is that we have to analyze it well first, so we can get the legit ico.

[ndico]

I think investing in a new ICO is a better idea, because new ICO gives a better ROI when they are launched newly before the price becomes stable, but due to the bear market and ICO winter, investing in an ICO this moment is not an option so I will go for already existing coin that are down below their ICO price.

[AgentZero23]

Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario

Having a functional product with actual use case is definitely a good assurance for the investors. Investors now are becoming smart in choosing the right ICO's to invest in. They would rather invest on something that's actually working than just mere an idea. Investors are getting tired of getting scammed and that's why having a working product would give them at least a peace of mind.

[FinanceX]

It can be difficult to find an ICO that already has a product but sometimes you don't have to look far

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Investing in an ICO is always very risky even if they already have a working product or MVP. The demand for a particular ICO tend to be more important that the actual technology behind it, so you are safer when investing into the hyped ICO than a non-hyped one even if it has strong fundamentals.

[5ensei]

Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario

If it already has a proven product then the price will be higher than for non-proven products. The reason why these ICOs are attractive is because of the pre-sale discounts, they are huge because the investment is risky. The ROI if you buy at a low price point is worth the risk if the project is good

[FinanceX]

Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario

If it already has a proven product then the price will be higher than for non-proven products. The reason why these ICOs are attractive is because of the pre-sale discounts, they are huge because the investment is risky. The ROI if you buy at a low price point is worth the risk if the project is good

In most cases maybe, Our ICO prices are: Round 1 0.028, Round 2 0.036, and Round 3 0.047. These are very attractive prices for a crypto-trading platform without real competition in Southeast Asia.

[sinachy]

Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario

A project might have a functioning proven product but without having a mass adoption of the product then it will be of no use, any project can build a product, but the big question is this, is the product really needed? will it have mass adoption by the people? If the answer is yes then I will invest, If not, i will not invest.

[Nggedebus]

Putting investment in an ICO is somehow like a double edged sword.
If we don't careful to choose, we'll end up regret on what we invest in. But when we choose the good one, than it's a win for us.

[BattleHippo]

Yes it is true that an ICO with a white paper will not make money and good one based on their team work and effort it turns a good project so we should think about the projects who are working on it and what is their idea.

[dreammoney710]

Yes, it does make more sense that an ICO with only a whitepaper will not be making money as compared to one that has a good product which is working and has great ideas to offer too.

[crypto-bit456]

It is a good move to see that how successful the ICO are that you wish to invest in. It indicates that the project is a legit one and not a scam one. And it will be a good way to target those who are interested in it.

[Samkol26]

Yes true..  It's safer to invest in already functioning idea than the one you are not even sure if the idea will materialize..  I prefer that too but it's rare

[LaserPie]

Doesn't really mean that having a product or a working prototype would make huge difference because ICOs that have their products launched into the market are likely to be exclusively available for the big investors. Moreover, prototypes can be copied and showed to investors just to scam them later on. So, the idea is not really feasible.

[FinanceX]

An ICO with a product is far more trustworthy. It's important that product has proof of utility and success pre-ICO. Once investors know about it, the ICO will be extremely successful.

[Ghebung Masam]

Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario

I think so too, if they have a good product that has been used by many people, for what else we invest in ico which is not necessarily certainty, is it successful or not?