I like it, but i want to be able to include photo sets(25-50 pics in a zip with 2-3 in low res as a display)
Good idea. You can do it if I add the ability to have a different comment for fully paid pictures: Stitch the three together, upload them and then put a link to the zipfile in the comment. Not the best way though and it also misses the point of raising the resolution of individual pictures. I would prefer to upload a zipfile and then have the site to show as many forms as the pictures to set a price/address/comment for each one of them. What'd you think?
Is it a problem if the tits are super hairy?
HAHA, the low rez version would not show the hair so the buyer might have his/her 'mood' interupted when they receive it. ;p
We accept hairy tits. :-P
"Hotest" is misspelled.
Fixed. WTF was I thinking.
Your photo has been uploaded successfully and it will be approved in the next few days.
^ that is way too long these days hours should be more like it at worst
Or just upload them and let users flag inappropriate pictures.
I am trying as hard as I can to avoid illegal photos. Although I am not sure if checking them myself puts me in a better legal position than having them autoaccepted and just allowing users to flag them. Bad thing is that there are no accounts (and I'd like to keep it that way) so I can't really ban users, so someone could troll the site while now he can only troll me.
One way to solve the hairy tit problem might be to:
- in addition to age verification, ask for sexual orientation
That can be done and I can implement a tag system too. Might take a few days though cause I lack the time right now.
- users who view new photos get to rate them and newly posted/unrated pics are cheap to view
Nobody pays to view the picture. Users pay to increase the resolution of the picture but the picture is available to all. There is no point doing this on a per user basis since a user could grab the high res and give it to everyone.
- higher rated pics by users of the same sexual orientation cost a bit more for later users to view
Again the price is not paid per user. Whenever someone pays a portion of the final price, the picture grows towards its max res and it's available to eveyone. The closest thing I can think of is to report pictures with bad tags so that they are fixed/removed.
I realize that the best users for a site like this would be the people over /r/gonewild
You got it all wrong. The people who pay for porn are not at all the same people who know where to get it for free. Two completely separate audiences.
Anyways, just seen this link in /r/Bitcion, still having the same thought, how would this not go the way of eBaumsworld? Except the users are taking a cut along with eBaum. Which is funny as I know Bitcoin sort of brings that 'no rules' feel to the internet much like eBaum tried to claim as his defense in the first place. I just fear the first person ballsy enough to try and put something created by a SomethingAwful Goon on the site to see how that goes down.
Anyways, I still like the Bittit concept and think as long as it is on top of image regulation, it could be awesome.
What happened to ebaums? If you are worried about image regulation I can do it myself along with a friend for now and I preffer to keep it instead of allowing flagging of content. Unless someone has better (legal) advice. BTW I don't know if that is what you mean but we don't take any cut from the picture sales. The bitcoins get sent directly to the sellers wallet and we just monitor the transactions to raise the resolution as appropriate.
So should I put it in the wiki somewhere?