Are you looking for me?

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Reputation - Re: An obvious case of trust abuse (DT members welcome)
  

  It does not apply at all, i.e. the score is no longer affected by the amount risked.You posted the thread.

[1715657879]

1715657879

[1715657879]

1715657879

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Should forum persuade users of the merits of a customized trust lists?
  

  I disagree with the premise of needing topics to explain "the benefits". We need discussions on all aspects of the

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ TOP-200 ] Members who support newbies - Thanks!
  

  yeah me too. i sometimes wonder if im getting hoodwinked when i merit a noob, hard to tell even when 

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?
  

  One more scenario of toughening of selection: - 5 users having on 250+ merits - 10 users having on 100+

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ CLUBS ] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
  

  Of course, it is really good if you do it.I believe it is very simple for you, Mr. AI ^^Replacing

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?
  

  I just checked CH's post history, and their last 50 PAGES of posts have been just spewing vitriol and hatred

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ CLUBS ] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs
  

  Haha, it is the right time I raise a big question for you.You and theymos, are one of outstandings in

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Reputation - Re: Another interesting address found, let's talk about it.
  

  That's definitely a personal wallet as I have never seen a service till now that allows users to sign message

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Time Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly)
  

  I thank you, LoyceV, for another data dump this week.Update:Converted intra-day merits in 2019Code:. list id merit date day month2

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?
  

  It went right when I found DT members trying to bully an innocent person.Then I found out about the snake

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Speculation - Re: Issues with contact less payments.
  

  at first I've disabled them too. One year later I've re-enabled them. It's convenient.And the limit for contactless payments can

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?
  

  I think you made a typo - shouldn't that be a killerpost?

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Should forum persuade users of the merits of a customized trust lists?
  

  Technically he has a trust list  and he is right when he said...

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Speculation - Re: Issues with contact less payments.
  

  Umm.. nope. The card in the bag takes about the same space in the wallet as the card used to

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages:

 

• Bitcoin - Bitcoin Discussion - Re: Best way to pay newbie with bitcoin?
  

  LoyceV

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  For the most part I'm good with any of these proposed scenarios. They all include the core group of people

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Sorry local rules only count if they are in the OP.I'm sorry that you are such a coward that feel

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Loyce ——>

[Maggiordomo]

LoyceV, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Because people just can't keep him on ignore. I understand the appeal of trying to refute his points, as I