[AuctionEnd] 8x Satori Coins Serialnumbers >2275015.9.2018/6pmMEZ[AuctionEnd]

[yogg]

Can someone clarify (not that it is imminently important), due to the serial numbers of these coins does that mean they do not have Bitcoin Gold?

Anything higher than serial 30500 doesn't have BCH and is considered "postfork".
I don't know for sure for the rest of the forks but I think prefork have Bitcoin gold / Bitcoin Diamond / etc etc ...

[1715246946]

1715246946

[1715246946]

1715246946

[1715246946]

1715246946

[1715246946]

1715246946

[1715246946]

1715246946

[bill gator]

It looks like all of these coins were funded by the same transaction, and all only have that single transaction in their history. Yet, some of the coins have Super Bitcoin, and some of them do not. Can you help me understand why that might be?

Specifically :

022736
1Q6sxgAvsKM4xFXqSogpRB5KaA4Rk5HxrB

022721
19PybHNfvXG2muju7eMs5a5XnJQ3eaBQKL

Are missing Super Bitcoin and I can't figure it out.

Must've just been an API hang-up or something. Was showing it wrong, but now it's there.. It was showing the amount of Super Bitcoin as 0, not the $ amount, but the amount of Super Bitcoin. I appreciate all the info though krogo, it's been very helpful.

[krogothmanhattan]

It looks like all of these coins were funded by the same transaction, and all only have that single transaction in their history. Yet, some of the coins have Super Bitcoin, and some of them do not. Can you help me understand why that might be?

Specifically :

022736
1Q6sxgAvsKM4xFXqSogpRB5KaA4Rk5HxrB

022721
19PybHNfvXG2muju7eMs5a5XnJQ3eaBQKL

Are missing Super Bitcoin and I can't figure it out.

The value is about $6 for one super BTC

The amount is so small it does not show in $..it would  be $0.00628..the site does not show past the 1 cent range.

Its less than one cent. But there is 0.001 SuperBTC as you can see.

[Bitmainer3.0]

Top Bid 0.051BTC from Bill Gator with Minerjones as Escrow

[Bitmainer3.0]

The Coins are in a very good condition and have no wrinkled stickers.

[coincrag]

0.052BTC

[yogg]

0.052BTC

Is this bid considered valid ?
Given the rank of the bidder, this bid should be secured to be considered valid.
Or maybe OP, do you agree to sell to 2nd highest bid in case this one isn't honored ?

[coincrag]

0.052BTC

Is this bid considered valid ?
Given the rank of the bidder, this bid should be secured to be considered valid.
Or maybe OP, do you agree to sell to 2nd highest bid in case this one isn't honored ?

Why wouldn't it be?  At one point everyone starts off as a newbie.  My ebay search for Satori coins brought me here.  If we need more rigor around valid bids and users, then posting messages on a forum for a timed, online auction is probably not the most secure method.  There's still over a day left for anyone to post a higher bid.  So, rather than questioning if someone else's bid is valid, feel free to post your own bid if you're interested. 

[bill gator]

You know why it wouldn't be. You are acting as though there is no reason for anybody to hold any skepticism about your bid. We have been hurt in the past and you hopefully can understand where we are coming from when newbies regularly screw up auctions and raffles for everyone else.

It would be extraordinarily helpful if you were able to provide a signed message that includes your bid, username and date from an address that holds at least your bid amount for verification. This would ease everybody up a bit, I'm sure. We welcome newbies, but certain users prohibit them from participating in their sales threads, because they regularly come with more headaches than they are worth. Not saying this is the case, but if you are serious about your bid there are ways to prove it.

[Bitmainer3.0]

The Account from Coincrag is registered
on March 09, 2018, 10:23:29 PM.

[yogg]

Why wouldn't it be?  At one point everyone starts off as a newbie.  My ebay search for Satori coins brought me here.  If we need more rigor around valid bids and users, then posting messages on a forum for a timed, online auction is probably not the most secure method.  There's still over a day left for anyone to post a higher bid.  So, rather than questioning if someone else's bid is valid, feel free to post your own bid if you're interested.  

Reminds me of a certain Cascoinking ...  
That was a malicious user who bid on his own auctions with alt account to drive the item price up, and seller didn't sell to 2nd highest bid.

I'm not saying this is what you do, but that bid from an account with only 3 posts is questionable.
Since it outbids bill gator, I asked, what are you going to do about that ? Are you going to accept the 2nd highest bid in case this user doesn't reply ?
What will you do to prevent this kind of abuse ?

We trust you, the seller, since there is an escrow involved. All the rest is questionable.
I'm not accusing you of anything, just trying to figure out how this will end.

[Bitmainer3.0]

UPDATE: Coingrag got banned from this Auction.

Every future bid need to be done from Member ranked Users and up.
Newbies and jr. Members Users Bids will be not accepted.

Current Top Bid 0.051BTC from bill gator

[AT101ET]

Banning all new members from bidding isn’t the most fair of practices. You should allow lower ranked members to bid so long as they prove that they have said funds in an address by signing a message and verifying the legitimacy of their bid. I think that’s the fairest approach. Just my 2 cents.

[wheelz1200]

Banning all new members from bidding isn’t the most fair of practices. You should allow lower ranked members to bid so long as they prove that they have said funds in an address by signing a message and verifying the legitimacy of their bid. I think that’s the fairest approach. Just my 2 cents.

I agree we were all newbies and juniors at some point.  To each their own, but i dont have an issue with newer members bidding on my stuff so long as they verify they are legit.  Or put a stipulation in that they have to send a fractional amount in to an escrow that is non refundable if they bail on the auction if they win it.

[Bitmainer3.0]

Sorry the Rules for this Auction is set and will not change

[wheelz1200]

Sorry the Rules for this Auction is set and will not change

Its your auction and i understand was just throwing you some ideas for the future, cheers.

[Bitmainer3.0]

Current Top Bid 0.051BTC  from bill gator

[Antuam]

Hello.

My bid is 0.0515BTC

Regards.
Antuam

[Bitmainer3.0]

Hello.

My bid is 0.0515BTC

Regards.
Antuam

Hello this bid is not valid, min. Bid incresement is
0.001BTC

current top bid 0.051BTC from bill gator

[bill gator]

Everybody is welcome to bid here
I can‘t see any kind of troll or manipulation.

UPDATE: Coingrag got banned from this Auction.

Every future bid need to be done from Member ranked Users and up.
Newbies and jr. Members Users Bids will be not accepted.

I am a bit confused as to what happened between quote 1 and quote 2. As far as I can tell, this user has done nothing wrong and without explanation this seems like you're just changing the rules on the fly. Besides that, you say that all future bids must be from Members and higher ranks, but that would not disqualify past bids (specifically, Coingrag's top bid). That user won the mystery box from Minerjones as well, so it seems like they're just around for some honest auction participation (unless there's something I don't see/know).

Why were they banned from this auction?

Sorry the Rules for this Auction is set and will not change

You say this, but have clearly just changed a rule, and this was said only a few hours after you had changed the rules, so again I am left confused.