attention to the managers of the bounty campaigns !!!

[3acaga]

attention to the managers of the bounty campaigns !!!

Hello bounty campaign managers !!!
I ask you to pay attention to the constant violations of your requirements that concern - do not write a second report in the subject of the bounty, and edit your first post.
Already in many bounty campaigns I encountered such a requirement, but bounty managers still count this spam when counting stacks, which they themselves ask not to do.
P.S. If you need more posts on the forum, then why do you need to edit the first post in the rules

I apologize for the bad English ...

[TheBeardedBaby]

I don't think that you gonna find here a campaign manager that doesn't care about the rules.
Those you are after almost never read/ post here or even if they stop by, they never pay attention to such things.

[Welsh]

Those you are after almost never read/ post here or even if they stop by, they never pay attention to such things.

Exactly. They don't even pay attention to the participants of their campaign that they are getting paid for. Whether that's being hired or representing themselves for their company. You would think they'd care about their reputation....that's assuming that their projects are legit though....

[The Cryptovator]

~snip~

I can bet 99% bounty managers never checked or investigate any ICO project as well. The question is visit meta, I don't think so they have time to visit meta board. Even well reputed managers visit here occasionally. I wonder when I seen on bounty section, almost managers are just Jr. Members. What I guess, an well reputed managers behind of mostly Jr. Members. They just made post by few Jr. Members account. As far as I know that huge reputed managers got red tag due to promote scam projects. They are opareting bounty by Jr. Members. But every thing manage by experienced managers. Although I don't have enough proof, but I know it. Every managers have their own telegram group. They just choose Jr. Members account only for posting. However it will never end. And someone alone can't change this behaviour, as well scam isn't moderated by forum.

[sheenshane]

-snip...
I wonder when I seen on bounty section, almost managers are just Jr. Members. What I guess, an well reputed managers behind of mostly Jr. Members.

If the Bounty/Campaign Manager is Jr.member I don't think so if that manager got participants. Probably, those low ranks also will participate in that campaign. No one got trust on that bounty manager if only Jr. manager, or even a Copper member account since not well known or reputed manager. (If I'm a bounty hunter I never look a project that managing by Jr.member only).

All participants must have a proof of authentication report when they apply, and no need to have another post in making a report weekly only edit the first post they had. Well, I know who's manager doing on that strictly having a rule that never counts the work if the participants do not follow the simple instruction. It is good to hear that those Bounty Managers in altcoins section must know that and implementing that rules as well to avoid continue spamming those lazy participants. Probably they did not read the pinned post of mprep there.

[Ayston]

attention to the managers of the bounty campaigns !!!

Hello bounty campaign managers !!!
I ask you to pay attention to the constant violations of your requirements that concern - do not write a second report in the subject of the bounty, and edit your first post.
Already in many bounty campaigns I encountered such a requirement, but bounty managers still count this spam when counting stacks, which they themselves ask not to do.
P.S. If you need more posts on the forum, then why do you need to edit the first post in the rules

I apologize for the bad English ...

Some people used to quote their previous report because one post has its word count limit so they need to make the quoting method... Is that your concern?

It's up to the manager to disqualify bounty hunter but they are not doing it since they are prioritizing the effort of the hunter making advertisement in their social media...

Consideration you may say...

[julerz12]

attention to the managers of the bounty campaigns !!!

Hello bounty campaign managers !!!
I ask you to pay attention to the constant violations of your requirements that concern - do not write a second report in the subject of the bounty, and edit your first post.
Already in many bounty campaigns I encountered such a requirement, but bounty managers still count this spam when counting stacks, which they themselves ask not to do.
P.S. If you need more posts on the forum, then why do you need to edit the first post in the rules

I apologize for the bad English ...

This depends on what rules are laid within the bounty campaign. If it's prohibited then everyone on that campaign should comply. If it's not then it's allowed.
I think those participants who are overly posting reports are using bots to post their massive reports on a daily basis. (I forgot the link where I saw such service that offers this)
I recently have a bounty campaign that ended but even when the announcement has been made over and over again that it ended and we no longer accept weekly reports; we still receive weekly reports.
Which is why I tend to lock my ended campaigns to avoid unnecessary spam being posted by those robots. Don't get me wrong, those who use bots are still qualified to participate, but their method of posting reports on the bounty thread (using bots) is not acceptable.

-snip...
I wonder when I seen on bounty section, almost managers are just Jr. Members. What I guess, an well reputed managers behind of mostly Jr. Members.

If the Bounty/Campaign Manager is Jr.member I don't think so if that manager got participants. Probably, those low ranks also will participate in that campaign. No one got trust on that bounty manager if only Jr. manager, or even a Copper member account since not well known or reputed manager. (If I'm a bounty hunter I never look a project that managing by Jr.member only).

All participants must have a proof of authentication report when they apply, and no need to have another post in making a report weekly only edit the first post they had. Well, I know who's manager doing on that strictly having a rule that never counts the work if the participants do not follow the simple instruction. It is good to hear that those Bounty Managers in altcoins section must know that and implementing that rules as well to avoid continue spamming those lazy participants. Probably they did not read the pinned post of mprep there.

Posting reports via the bounty thread in bounties section is actually allowed. (Unless prohibited by the bounty campaign rules itself) Link
"Accepting signups or requiring proof of participation for tasks requiring substantial effort (e.g. signature campaign signups, weekly social media campaign reports, media (videos, images, articles, etc.) bounty signups, etc.) via a thread posted in Bounties (Altcoins) is allowed though."

[Findingnemo]

No bounty manager is ever going to take consideration of your post,but if you really want to stop them from being arrogant just stop doing bounties if most of the people stop from participating on the bounties then the managers have no roll on it the our forum also be spam free.

[rsbriggs]

I don't think that you gonna find here a campaign manager that doesn't care about the rules.
Those you are after almost never read/ post here or even if they stop by, they never pay attention to such things.

Yes, I also support this suggestion because I do not think there is a manager here that is not after his reputation and will want to tarnish it by not caring or follow the rules and regulation laid down.

[Ojengonggu]

I don't think that you gonna find here a campaign manager that doesn't care about the rules.
Those you are after almost never read/ post here or even if they stop by, they never pay attention to such things.

Yes, I also support this suggestion because I do not think there is a manager here that is not after his reputation and will want to tarnish it by not caring or follow the rules and regulation laid down.

Most of the inserts about suggestions and criticisms for gift managers here never get answers from them. In fact, they rarely open topics in this forum. I understand with you, that maybe only a portion of the gift manager implements rules written on thread, so there is no spam account in it and filters this report every week. maybe because they are still inexperienced and self-employed so the bounty hunters must be able to choose not to participate arbitrarily

[3acaga]

thanks for answers
  My opinion is that you need to ban bounty reports on the forum
writing posts.
Campaign managers specifically motivate hunters to increase the number of posts in their theme about the bounty, but it's not good to bring the project to bear I think.
PS should transfer weekly reports on the work done in the form of Google - this will solve the problem ...

[Oilacris]

~snip~

I can bet 99% bounty managers never checked or investigate any ICO project as well. The question is visit meta, I don't think so they have time to visit meta board. Even well reputed managers visit here occasionally. I wonder when I seen on bounty section, almost managers are just Jr. Members. What I guess, an well reputed managers behind of mostly Jr. Members. They just made post by few Jr. Members account. As far as I know that huge reputed managers got red tag due to promote scam projects. They are opareting bounty by Jr. Members. But every thing manage by experienced managers. Although I don't have enough proof, but I know it. Every managers have their own telegram group. They just choose Jr. Members account only for posting. However it will never end. And someone alone can't change this behaviour, as well scam isn't moderated by forum.

Possible presumption but we don't still have any proofs that those Jr. members are those reputed old members of this forum.I haven't seen one though but theres a possibility.Most managers cant even really tell about the legitimacy of such project and they will not suffice their account once the project goes wrong but I have seen some of them do completely stop the bounty when they saw something shady on it which is really a good act and talking about on the thing said by OP. Most managers wont really care at all as long they have been paid then deep though checking is impossible.

[entrepmind23]

I don't think that you gonna find here a campaign manager that doesn't care about the rules.
Those you are after almost never read/ post here or even if they stop by, they never pay attention to such things.

If you want to let the managers know then better post it in their thread or write to them personally but then I bet, they wouldn't reply to you because they are too busy dealing with their own job. I though hope though that the managers would be able to address such issues because it would make them not trustworthy because they don't follow their own rule. Some managers are reputable though because they are strict and know their priorities.

Yes, I also support this suggestion because I do not think there is a manager here that is not after his reputation and will want to tarnish it by not caring or follow the rules and regulation laid down.

There are managers who are doing a good job. It would be more advantageous if the reporting would be done on a google form so that there will be no need to post the report in the forum. It would be easier as well for the managers though to directly count it in the forms than check  in the thread but the problem is that there is so many cheaters who fill up the form claiming thee work of others as theirs.

[julerz12]

There are managers who are doing a good job. It would be more advantageous if the reporting would be done on a google form so that there will be no need to post the report in the forum. It would be easier as well for the managers though to directly count it in the forms than check  in the thread but the problem is that there is so many cheaters who fill up the form claiming thee work of others as theirs.

Using google forms as a way to submit weekly/daily reports is both good and bad. Good in way that it helps lessen the numerous amount of reports flooded on this forum on a daily basis. Bad in way that it could be exploited by many cheaters by simply submitting reports by other participants and making it their own. The manager could hide the sheet that contains the reports but this hinders the aimed transparency. Also, the sad fact that most ICO's would prefer their reports to be posted directly within the bounty thread as a way of bumping their bounty threads every now and then; If that is what the Project Team would want, of course the bounty manager would implement it. Unless a rule will be drafted/implemented on this forum prohibiting such manner of reporting, everything we see now will only remain the same.

[joniboini]

Using google forms as a way to submit weekly/daily reports is both good and bad. Good in way that it helps lessen the numerous amount of reports flooded on this forum on a daily basis. Bad in way that it could be exploited by many cheaters by simply submitting reports by other participants and making it their own.

What if requiring every participant to post a BTC signed message describing which campaign they participate and what address they will use as a proof of participation, and then the report must send weekly via the form? Of course, the sheets should be made public.

Recently my account and my articles were submitted by someone but using a different address, luckily I know that so I can inform the bounty manager. But it is impossible to watch every bounty thread and reports.

[Kramblerty]

~snip~

I can bet 99% bounty managers never checked or investigate any ICO project as well. The question is visit meta, I don't think so they have time to visit meta board. Even well reputed managers visit here occasionally. I wonder when I seen on bounty section, almost managers are just Jr. Members. What I guess, an well reputed managers behind of mostly Jr. Members. They just made post by few Jr. Members account. As far as I know that huge reputed managers got red tag due to promote scam projects. They are opareting bounty by Jr. Members. But every thing manage by experienced managers. Although I don't have enough proof, but I know it. Every managers have their own telegram group. They just choose Jr. Members account only for posting. However it will never end. And someone alone can't change this behaviour, as well scam isn't moderated by forum.

Ha. You had replied to the question I was asking myself "why so many bounties are started by Jr. Members nowadays" and now I got the answer. Thank you!

And I do believe that no one wants to participate in a bounty where the manager is Junior (even if there is a Hero behing it) because he will not be responsible enough.

[joniboini]

And I do believe that no one wants to participate in a bounty where the manager is Junior (even if there is a Hero behing it) because he will not be responsible enough.

Judging by their rank to conclude how they perform bounty management is not what I usually do though. Even Legendary/Hero/Senior ranked managers are sometimes a pain in the ass. Ridiculously slow to update and responds to participants inquiry and so on. For example, bountyportal (run by a Legendary manager) is very unresponsive, has a lot of problems in the platform, etc. See their group for yourself.

I'd rather see how well they perform their works, regardless of their ranks. Sometimes an ICO starts the bounty by themselves using Copper Membership, and they did well managing their bounty.