"Vision of Satoshi" To "Philosophy"

[lordmeen]

First of all.
I things vision of satoshi being after satoshi nakamoto don't post some things from in 2014
I use many hour per day to read many topic than most of BTC bitcoin millionaire believe in vision of satoshi and future of bitcoin
it don't have fundamental like stock in market exchange

Howevery. Vision can be use 3-5 years what things you want
                Mission is what do you do it this year and Action is what do you do now.
  
So how do you things if we call Philosophy of Nakamoto instead of Vision of Satoshi ?

[avikz]

Due to very poor English, I am unable to understand your statement entirely! However, let me know why do you think that "Vision" and "Philosophy" are two different things? There are fundamental differences but in broader perspective, how it is different? Both talks about the future and talks about an way to achieve the future goal.

Also let me know how it will make a difference if we call it as "Philosophy of Nakamoto" instead of "Vision of Satoshi"??

[DooMAD]

Regardless of whether you call it a vision, philosophy, mantra or something else entirely, Bitcoin has now grown far beyond the influence of one person (assuming satoshi wasn't a group, that is).  People should stop basing their views about Bitcoin's current direction on what they believe satoshi would have wanted.  Not only because no one can know exactly what that was now, but also because you can't logically have a decentralised crypto if you're constantly making an appeal to authority when trying to move forward.

[lordmeen]

Due to very poor English, I am unable to understand your statement entirely! However, let me know why do you think that "Vision" and "Philosophy" are two different things? There are fundamental differences but in broader perspective, how it is different? Both talks about the future and talks about an way to achieve the future goal.

Also let me know how it will make a difference if we call it as "Philosophy of Nakamoto" instead of "Vision of Satoshi"??

Thank you for your answer. after i read your reply i things every second to explain you
And i will answer your as soon as possible

[lordmeen]

Regardless of whether you call it a vision, philosophy, mantra or something else entirely, Bitcoin has now grown far beyond the influence of one person (assuming satoshi wasn't a group, that is).  People should stop basing their views about Bitcoin's current direction on what they believe satoshi would have wanted.  Not only because no one can know exactly what that was now, but also because you can't logically have a decentralised crypto if you're constantly making an appeal to authority when trying to move forward.

Thank you so much . Thank you god to send you to reply my topic.
if i basing in satoshi BTCbitcoin it not decentralised i agree with you because vision of satoshi want to make bitcoin to decentralised

thank you agin.

[palle11]

However, let me know why do you think that "Vision" and "Philosophy" are two different things?

I just want to attempt on what I feel about the two terms as they relate to bitcoin.
For vision of Satoshi on bitcoin, it could be the popularity and adoption, price of bitcoin in the future. While,

For philosophy of Satoshi on bitcoin, it could be its purpose and solutions as against the norms with fiat currency which are basically the advanges of bitcoin. For example, anonymous, decentralized, easy usage etc.

[lordmeen]

However, let me know why do you think that "Vision" and "Philosophy" are two different things?

I just want to attempt on what I feel about the two terms as they relate to bitcoin.
For vision of Satoshi on bitcoin, it could be the popularity and adoption, price of bitcoin in the future. While,

For philosophy of Satoshi on bitcoin, it could be its purpose and solutions as against the norms with fiat currency which are basically the advanges of bitcoin. For example, anonymous, decentralized, easy usage etc.

Thank you For your opinion. May i know where r u from?

[Fornam]

If we think about Satoshi’s philosophy then his 1st intention of creating crypto is for reducing the problem with fiat currency because there were lots of problem related with fiat currency but with this Currency I mean BTC there is no problem and with blockchain tech we can get crystal clear transaction.

[hugeblack]

This attempt to correct some of the apparent errors will make the topic better.

First of all.
I things vision of Satoshi being after Satoshi Nakamoto don't post some things from in 2014
I use many hours per day to read many topics than most of BTC bitcoin millionaire believe in a vision of Satoshi and future of bitcoin
it doesn't have fundamental like stock in market exchange

However. Vision can be used 3-5 years what things you want.
                A mission is what do you do it this year and Action is what do you do now.

Perhaps we can adopt Satoshi's philosophy if it exists, but his disappearance is proof that he wanted to ignite the idea of decentralization and not use for that account is a proof that he wants the currency to be decentralized as his decisions will have a lot of impacts.

The worst thing that can happen is the control of whales and governments over price or impact.

[Dudeperfect]

As per my understanding, it is something like a vision statement and mission statement for the Bitcoin. The vision states what will be the position of Bitcoin down the road and philosophy/mission statement will give the fundamental values and guidelines for the users to keep in mind while dealing with Bitcoin. However, I seriously feel that we should put use our energy to solve more important issues instead of playing with jargons.

[btcmaster999]

Instead of Satoshi Vision, Nakamoto's philosophy is not two things I believe. Although there is no difference. However, we can see there is a difference between them is if we think fundamentally. But in a larger view, this two are the same thing.

[BlackFly]

I have a general idea about your statement. Where you say about philosophy and vision are two different topics. Although there is a fundamental difference between it. But in the larger perspective it has actually no different.

[Patriode]

You have mentioned something about a vision or Philosophy here. I think the subject of vision and Philosophy are same in broad sence but there has a little difference with vision and philosophy.

[CryptoGosu]

I think that Satoshi's philosophy and Satoshi's vision are not one and the same. Satoshi's vision is his vision of Bitcoin and Satoshi's philosophy is how he sees the financial and social systems of society.

[robbietobby]

I found this last 2017 by Satoshi Nakamoto, would have an estimated fortune of $ 17 billion at today's Bitcoin price. There are even theories that support the fact that it is rather a group of individuals who wanted to enrich themselves and not so much as to plant the seed of a financial revolution. In any case, that embryonic financial idea has not ceased to shake the foundations of the traditional economic system as people love to speculate nowadays.

[oceantiger]

First of all.
I things vision of satoshi being after satoshi nakamoto don't post some things from in 2014
I use many hour per day to read many topic than most of BTC bitcoin millionaire believe in vision of satoshi and future of bitcoin
it don't have fundamental like stock in market exchange

Howevery. Vision can be use 3-5 years what things you want
                Mission is what do you do it this year and Action is what do you do now.
  
So how do you things if we call Philosophy of Nakamoto instead of Vision of Satoshi ?

I will like to differ a bit from you on mission. What is your Mission ? Mission is what you set out to achieve or what the project you are carrying out will end up bringing. Actions are what you will be doing to get your mission achieved. Your actions will lead you to your set goals which goals may be various or multiples which all of them when completed will result in the mission being fulfilled.

[Argoo]

I think that Satoshi Nakamoto had a slightly different view of how the bitcoin he had created should function. It was created as an alternative payment system to the existing payment system, so that people could use the new capabilities of the crypto currency. However, he probably could not have assumed that his bitcoin would now be usedas a speculative means of accumulating value.

[bratuha]

I think that Satoshi Nakamoto had a slightly different view of how the bitcoin he had created should function. It was created as an alternative payment system to the existing payment system, so that people could use the new capabilities of the crypto currency. However, he probably could not have assumed that his bitcoin would now be usedas a speculative means of accumulating value.

I think that he sees this situation. The bitcoin is money and should to used as a speculative means of accumulating value

[Vipersia]

Satoshi used to invent bitcoin the first crypto in the world. Bitcoin still improving and it's potentiality is high. So hope it's already able to fulfill satoshi's vision.

[RudeSlider]

Bitcoin is the currency which are decentralized. So, there are no third party who monitoring this transection. So, definitely it's a great invesntion of satoshi. But how the philosophy work here?