gondel
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
|
 |
July 10, 2014, 02:10:36 PM |
|
Hi,
Is there any exchange which still accepts ECC?
I am still holding my coins and have a little hope here.
Is there someone who still using ECC as exchange?
BR
Gondel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
July 10, 2014, 03:29:23 PM |
|
ok the takeover thread locked must be a sign that
they merge with hostmaster and try together organize a wallet fix
and future steps for ECC
at least i hope so.....
Ok, first of all...I did NOT lock the takeover thread...I am wondering who did... Second, I contacted Hostmaster after he send me the PM, one week ago. He still did not answer to me, although I stated the importance of immediate action! The take over was a necessary action...I don't get it why some of you don't get this...  it's ok, i allow you to takeover. As to The fork issue, i still host two ECC nodes on dedicated servers. we need to release new QT and alert all node users to update. I need to know more detail about issue. |
|
|
|
|
Dr Charles
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1080
|
|
July 10, 2014, 04:12:41 PM |
|
ok the takeover thread locked must be a sign that
they merge with hostmaster and try together organize a wallet fix
and future steps for ECC
at least i hope so.....
Ok, first of all...I did NOT lock the takeover thread...I am wondering who did... Second, I contacted Hostmaster after he send me the PM, one week ago. He still did not answer to me, although I stated the importance of immediate action! The take over was a necessary action...I don't get it why some of you don't get this... it's ok, i allow you to takeover. As to The fork issue, i still host two ECC nodes on dedicated servers. we need to release new QT and alert all node users to update. I need to know more detail about issue. Hostmaster, how can we help you? we need some direction here... you are the dev aka the man that's supposed to have the plan haha |
|
|
|
|
balu2
|
|
July 11, 2014, 05:08:53 AM |
|
any news on the current developement?
What's happening with ECC? Buy, sell, hodl?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
July 11, 2014, 05:36:15 AM
Last edit: July 11, 2014, 05:53:22 AM by hostmaster |
|
ok the takeover thread locked must be a sign that
they merge with hostmaster and try together organize a wallet fix
and future steps for ECC
at least i hope so.....
Ok, first of all...I did NOT lock the takeover thread...I am wondering who did... Second, I contacted Hostmaster after he send me the PM, one week ago. He still did not answer to me, although I stated the importance of immediate action! The take over was a necessary action...I don't get it why some of you don't get this... it's ok, i allow you to takeover. As to The fork issue, i still host two ECC nodes on dedicated servers. we need to release new QT and alert all node users to update. I need to know more detail about issue. Hostmaster, how can we help you? we need some direction here... you are the dev aka the man that's supposed to have the plan haha patience the virtue... whats the problem which is true block chain. can someone give more details. anyway i am on it. |
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:20:30 AM |
|
ok the takeover thread locked must be a sign that
they merge with hostmaster and try together organize a wallet fix
and future steps for ECC
at least i hope so.....
Ok, first of all...I did NOT lock the takeover thread...I am wondering who did... Second, I contacted Hostmaster after he send me the PM, one week ago. He still did not answer to me, although I stated the importance of immediate action! The take over was a necessary action...I don't get it why some of you don't get this... it's ok, i allow you to takeover. As to The fork issue, i still host two ECC nodes on dedicated servers. we need to release new QT and alert all node users to update. I need to know more detail about issue. Hostmaster, how can we help you? we need some direction here... you are the dev aka the man that's supposed to have the plan haha patience the virtue... whats the problem which is true block chain. can someone give more details. anyway i am on it. i honestly think since mintpal is the main exchange that was used to transfer and trade ECC we should use the chain that they are on. claim it the true chain. get rid of the rest and continue from here. if the price goes up enough to warrent a BTC trading pair mintpal will add it back. they did it with karmacoin |
|
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:31:20 AM |
|
Thank you HostMaster!!
This shows that you care about ECC. Now that Hostmaster agrees to give the repository owner rights to the new team, the new team can start to fix the wallet without having any problems with the exchanges.
In my opinion it would be a pre if the new team works together with HostMaster if he wants that.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:34:47 AM |
|
Thank you HostMaster!!
This shows that you care about ECC. Now that Hostmaster agrees to give the repository owner rights to the new team, the new team can start to fix the wallet without having any problems with the exchanges.
In my opinion it would be a pre if the new team works together with HostMaster if he wants that.
thats the way no takeover just new team-members joining in and fill the ranks of ECC team |
|
|
|
|
goldmaxx
|
|
July 11, 2014, 10:44:21 AM |
|
Thank you HostMaster!!
This shows that you care about ECC. Now that Hostmaster agrees to give the repository owner rights to the new team, the new team can start to fix the wallet without having any problems with the exchanges.
In my opinion it would be a pre if the new team works together with HostMaster if he wants that.
I agree... Now the first thing to do is make sure we have a new wallet and are all on the same fork! I also sugest we keep the fork mintpal is on... Regards Goldmaxx |
|
|
|
|
Goattrading
|
|
July 11, 2014, 06:50:14 PM |
|
Thank you HostMaster!!
This shows that you care about ECC. Now that Hostmaster agrees to give the repository owner rights to the new team, the new team can start to fix the wallet without having any problems with the exchanges.
In my opinion it would be a pre if the new team works together with HostMaster if he wants that.
I agree... Now the first thing to do is make sure we have a new wallet and are all on the same fork! I also sugest we keep the fork mintpal is on... Regards Goldmaxx Goldmaxx, Griffith Karma had to maintain 140 and greater price on the litecoin market to be relisted on the BTC. Any coin on mintpal that sits at 3sat or lower gets dropped to the LTC market. (Karm was at 180 yesterday (was a good buy) and hit 2sat) Wallet fix plus block explorer and the market will be able to trade/hold/transfer back and forth from exchanges again as wallets will be unfrozen. At which point we will see how the market views ECC.... Good to see potential developing again. |
“I never ask a man what his business is, for it never interests me. What I ask him about are his thoughts and dreams.”
― H.P. Lovecraft
|
|
|
|
some138
|
|
July 11, 2014, 09:18:29 PM |
|
stupid "takeover". Next time before you do it, think if you are technically capable. Now let the original dev fix the fork issues.
|
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 02:21:05 AM |
|
ok the takeover thread locked must be a sign that
they merge with hostmaster and try together organize a wallet fix
and future steps for ECC
at least i hope so.....
Ok, first of all...I did NOT lock the takeover thread...I am wondering who did... Second, I contacted Hostmaster after he send me the PM, one week ago. He still did not answer to me, although I stated the importance of immediate action! The take over was a necessary action...I don't get it why some of you don't get this... it's ok, i allow you to takeover. As to The fork issue, i still host two ECC nodes on dedicated servers. we need to release new QT and alert all node users to update. I need to know more detail about issue. Hostmaster, how can we help you? we need some direction here... you are the dev aka the man that's supposed to have the plan haha patience the virtue... whats the problem which is true block chain. can someone give more details. anyway i am on it. I think some big coin holders did not upgrade their wallet thus the latest checkpoint was not followed. Other wallets are getting these nodes with different block chains so it's not syncing properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:55:02 AM
Last edit: July 12, 2014, 04:07:16 AM by hostmaster |
|
There were two forks 195k and 197k. When fixed, old versions will follow the true chain. ...currently working on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
July 12, 2014, 06:59:29 AM |
|
There were two forks 195k and 197k. When fixed, old versions will follow the true chain. ...currently working on it.
feel free borrowing from diamond code the solution u have to make new wallet ban old wallets when they try establish peer connection we had much troubles with old wallets to and that solved it we do it based on the wallet subver active it look like that in debug log 07/11/14 19:17:38 accepted connection 72.78.100.2:40751 07/11/14 19:17:38 received: version (100 bytes) 07/11/14 19:17:38 connected subver /Diamond:2.0.1/ 07/11/14 19:17:38 partner 72.78.100.2:40751 using obsolete client /Diamond:2.0.1/ 07/11/14 19:17:38 ProcessMessage(version, 100 bytes) FAILED 07/11/14 19:17:38 disconnecting node 72.78.100.2:40751 |
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 12, 2014, 08:29:44 AM |
|
There were two forks 195k and 197k. When fixed, old versions will follow the true chain. ...currently working on it.
feel free borrowing from diamond code the solution u have to make new wallet ban old wallets when they try establish peer connection we had much troubles with old wallets to and that solved it we do it based on the wallet subver active it look like that in debug log 07/11/14 19:17:38 accepted connection 72.78.100.2:40751 07/11/14 19:17:38 received: version (100 bytes) 07/11/14 19:17:38 connected subver /Diamond:2.0.1/ 07/11/14 19:17:38 partner 72.78.100.2:40751 using obsolete client /Diamond:2.0.1/ 07/11/14 19:17:38 ProcessMessage(version, 100 bytes) FAILED 07/11/14 19:17:38 disconnecting node 72.78.100.2:40751 That's the spirit....Everybody trying to help to solve the ECC problems. All to gether we can do it and bring ECC back where it belongs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Krista
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:09:32 AM |
|
All have problems with a wallet? There is no synchronization how to solve?
|
|
|
|
|
Majormax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1129
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:27:11 AM |
|
All have problems with a wallet? There is no synchronization how to solve?
Wait for the new wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:56:28 PM |
|
Fork issue fixed new wallet: http://www.eccoin.cc/ECCoin16.zipnew nodes: addnode=130.111.219.86 addnode=14.124.41.77 addnode=69.254.47.191 addnode=115.29.160.13 addnode=67.174.140.115 addnode=194.33.113.172 addnode=188.44.107.246 addnode=46.159.202.245 addnode=93.104.211.172 Please alert exchanges and other places. currently 198061 is the correct block number |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatov
|
|
July 12, 2014, 03:58:16 PM |
|
Fork issue fixed new wallet: http://www.eccoin.cc/ECCoin16.zipnew nodes: addnode=130.111.219.86 addnode=14.124.41.77 addnode=69.254.47.191 addnode=115.29.160.13 addnode=67.174.140.115 addnode=194.33.113.172 addnode=188.44.107.246 addnode=46.159.202.245 addnode=93.104.211.172 Please alert exchanges and other places. currently 198061 is the correct block number Thanks! Are old nodes available? |
Fatov was here▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬For private, fast and secure transactions DASH is King | Dashtalk
|
|
|
|
