We can totally eradicate poverty if we TRULY want to.

[lingwistiko]

Being close-mindedness for improvement and for better living is one of the reasons why poverty comes in. Just like some people who don't believe in cryptocurrencies is like missing the opportunity to change their lives into a better one.

[Ahimoth]

Being close-mindedness for improvement and for better living is one of the reasons why poverty comes in. Just like some people who don't believe in cryptocurrencies is like missing the opportunity to change their lives into a better one.

Yes of course we can completely destroy poverty by helping those people who really need help but its better if the government should do something or do program that help many people to have a income. But its depend to someone that was help by government program because sometimes the problem is the people they helped. So I think we can escape from poverty if we want, since many livelihood programs are offering of government and there are so many rich people are also want to help them.

[Incodium Coin]

There is no magic wand we can wave to eradicate poverty. the causes of poverty vary widely, and no simple solution will change it. It'll take decades to lift people out of poverty. The international community can help, providing aid and a fair market for goods from poor countries. Aid alone doesn't help, it has to be targeted towards trade, education, and other infrastructural projects. All this must be coordinated, designed by the developing countries themselves, and avoid the mistakes of the past where so-called 'experts' with little knowledge on the realities of poor countries prescribe poverty. Also, local leadership, vision, and transparency in poor countries is pivotal. If not, aid money will end up in European Banks, as has been the case in the past decades. my two cents.

[efxtrader]

I think, the way to eradicate poverty is creating jobs for unemployment peoples. If peoples have a job, they have income and make economy run by consumption and investment.

[demonz666]

right I agree with you there is indeed a social responsibility that we must fulfill to eradicate poverty. my religion also teaches that 2.5% of our salary belongs to the poor and we must give it. poverty is not only the responsibility of the government but all of us. if we routinely provide assistance, I am sure there will be no poor people. unfortunately most people are selfish they only think about themselves.
and we can also invite them to learn about cryptocurrency so that they can participate in the bounty or campaign project. so they can also get paid and escape poverty. but this requires patience and process.

[Bonsaiav]

right I agree with you there is indeed a social responsibility that we must fulfill to eradicate poverty. my religion also teaches that 2.5% of our salary belongs to the poor and we must give it. poverty is not only the responsibility of the government but all of us. if we routinely provide assistance, I am sure there will be no poor people. unfortunately most people are selfish they only think about themselves.
and we can also invite them to learn about cryptocurrency so that they can participate in the bounty or campaign project. so they can also get paid and escape poverty. but this requires patience and process.

It can also be called a struggle. Because, success cannot be achieved, in an instant way. There are no people who are suddenly successful. Surely they achieve success with effort that's not easy. If you want to be successful in the crypto world, you also need to add your insight and learn more. Even though all of that's not easy to do, but you have to believe that you can do it and can achieve success in the future.

[cybernetik7]

Poor people can easily be persuaded and controlled. They generally vote according to their ideology. Thus, governors are just giving empty promises and do nothing in order to destroy hunger and poverty until the next election. They find funny excuses for doing nothing for poor people and get their vote again. If poor people stop being behaving like a stupid kid and make reasonable decisions when voting, don't forget, and ask for what is promissed; they can eliminate liar politicians and be wealthier by time.

[Antianara]

Yeah, but that's only done at the community level. It means personal thought. If the activity of the cryptocurrency market creates a small fund for charity. That would be a plus for later steps of crypto.

[upsidedown75]

Through the help of the government and its people can poverty totally eradicate. By giving the poor people free education and livelihood projects and the people who received those benefits will study hard, to have a good job in the future and to become successful.

It is easier said than done. Poverty is not something that can easily be eradicated, if all the necessary things are not provided by the government, in terms of infrastructure, amenities and so on. All these are something that would bring about industrialization, there would indeed be more jobs, and people will always have a way to live a good life and enjoy most part of it without having to live in penury.

As long as all that is not provided, we will get to see some people getting limited in their space, but as long as people find somethings to do, it will help the economy as a whole to thrive and in a thriving economy, poverty level absolutely reduces.

[andrei56]

If everyone wants to be united to unify their vision and mission, surely it can. Cause to eradicate poverty, it's very important to increase one's human resources first, then create new jobs.

This must start on every individual and we should not depend on our government. Poverty is everywhere, educate people first and we will reach this kind of goal. Maybe cryptocurrency will help us to achieve it.

I concur, it seems very easy to say the governments need to be responsible for this but the truth is that if you want to reduce the level of poverty then each person needs to take responsibility and try to do something to improve their economic situation, and the best way to do this is with education of quality for everyone, that way more people will get out of poverty.

[Argoo]

All societies at all times tried to eliminate the poverty of people and no one has yet succeeded. Why did someone decide that this will succeed now? Because there was bitcoin? Will he feed the hungry? After all, with the help of Bitcoin, nothing material is created, which means that this is another illusion.

[Lorin]

Giving money is a good way to help others but it may be helpful if the person who recieve that money use it to improve his or her life.  Always bear on our mind that when you always give money when you see the person on the street when you pass by  , you make them lazy because they will only rely on what you are giving. Instead you must do something to help them in other way not just by giving  money.

[Harlot]

Totally eliminating poverty seems to be impossible, because once the majority of the people starts to climb the ladder you will see that the prices will start to go up, and it is not because of the rich being greedy but because it is part of the basics of supply and demand. Once a lot of poor people will become middle class they will start buying the things they don't usually buy which affects the demand on everything thus increasing the price. Totally eliminating poverty is not possible but the other alternative is we can ensure that people at the bottom of the hierarchy can get the basic needs they need like three meals a day and proper education.

[Micerker]

No fool would use their money to give to others because of pity, everyone here is looking for profits not to distribute morality. You should remove this thought from the beginning because in this world can only be the hierarchy of the rich and the poor.

[usorin]

So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.

Somehow it is better to be poor, because this kind of people can say what is humanity and which is the direction we shall take to create peaceful society.

[mensahkkofie]

Giving money to the poor is one way to curb poverty. I believe we can't eradicate poverty by giving money to the poor alone. I think we need to have a positive mindset so we can find a better and a more practical way to eradicate poverty from the system.

[jbarcenas18]

Poverty is just a decision to everyone and it is their choice that they came up to that. Rich is born to that but poor people have a chance to be rich if we work hard, think of a way how to earn big income or start a small business.

[btcjocan]

So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.

Being rich is what we always dreamed of.If we were born poor we need to work hard inorder to achieve it.We also need the help of the community to grow and explore different strategy on where our luck comforts.Working hard and luck i think if it could be combined we can reach our goals and become more successful.

[princeyeboah]

Poverty can be eradicated, no doubts about that. Firstly, to deal with poverty, it must be tackled from the psychological aspect. Poverty is a state of mind. What may seem poor to someone, may seem riches to another. We should learn to set realistic goals within our limits and learn to be content with what our efforts bring us.
On the other hand, poverty can be handled with the Blockchain technology. Most people are poor because of slowed business progress. Integrating Blockchain into a business brings an added sense of value to the business in the field of the payment systems. Once there is transparency and effective payment system (Blockchain offers this), there is likely going to be an increase in work productivity and increase in profit making margin.

[mgaturon]

Poverty can be lessen but not eradicated, It depends on the person how to handle it.

There is difference between giving money and giving business. For example; giving a specific person a money without knowledge in proper allocation will be spend  out for nothing.But if you give him a business with proper knowledge, that person will learn  to value the money knowning how to work for it and properly bugdet it.

-Giving money to the poor  is not the solution for them to become rich.