We can totally eradicate poverty if we TRULY want to.

[SirLancelot]

So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.

Lol I always argue with my friends about this same topic. I always tell them that as long as human beings are greedy, there is no one you can end poverty. We live in a world where people are very greedy and everyone cares only about their pocket than helping others. Everyone wants to be above others and give commands and being called Boss. So funny. With the way we are going, poverty will never end in this world.

[gelinshidong]

In fact, human games are a brutal competition. This is a historical testimony. Equal wealth is not suitable for human beings. Only some people cannot meet the progress of society. If everyone is satisfied, humanity will enter a recession civilization. But the help for the rogues is really too little. This is an era that we cannot change and can only be left to the people of the future to solve.

[wormgummy019]

So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.

You are right , I think it will be a good way to help people in need. We need to help them to survive in everyday life but of course they need to work hard for that. If we keep on giving them offerings , there will be a time that they take advantage on us.

[royaleFlag]

Most of the people I know are also against giving cash to people and helping them in other ways. But middle class people cannot do much. Creating a system or teaching them to do something might consume a lot of time and a person with regular job or business might not be able to manage this.

Solution to this is a combined effort from everyone to develop such a system.

Well in my opinion no one can eradicate poverty. There will be poverty in different forms at different stages of life. You can’t make everyone rich or even in middle class. This is natural fact.

[Altf4]

Even if we truly want to eradicate poverty but we can not totally eliminate poverty , because we can not totally convinced every people around , in any corner of the world ,for not all people are eager to get out from poverty, because some people are not all working so hard , because some are so lazy ,and do not want to level up their life.

[Kimonoe]

Even if we truly want to eradicate poverty but we can not totally eliminate poverty , because we can not totally convinced every people around , in any corner of the world ,for not all people are eager to get out from poverty, because some people are not all working so hard , because some are so lazy ,and do not want to level up their life.

right, the characteristics of each person is different, but of course with the existence of hard work and opportunities, success is in front of the eye. with all the limitations, sometimes we are led to think outside the box

[aeternus]

The levels of poverty all around the world have been decreasing for decades so even if there are many people living in poverty that percentage has decreased significantly and if things keep going in the right direction then that tendency is going to maintain itself, but eradicating poverty is not a problem that can be solved in a matter of days, it will take even longer maybe even more decades or maybe even centuries but it can be done.

[demonz666]

So many people are interested in amassing wealth without giving a dime to the less privilege around them, yet they will still be among the first to criticize the government in its failure to eradicate hunger and poverty in the country. You should also know that the duty of eradicating poverty must not be left to the government alone. You must also contribute your quota.
 
If you have worked to be wealthy or lucky to be one, you should see it as a social responsibility to help the less privileged people in the society. If I may ask, do you feel comfortable driving past several beggars on the street when you have billions of money in your account that you or your entire family may not be able to exhaust in the next 100 years?
 
Think about this seriously. With the so much money in the world, poverty can greatly be reduced if not totally eradicated.
 
All that is necessary is the distribution of this wealth.

There is enough to go round.

Note:
You must not necessarily give physical cash or money directly in order to help the poor or the less privileged. You can set up an empowerment scheme where they could be empowered or work to earn a living for themselves. It is like teaching them how to fish instead of offering them the fish directly to eat. I guess it is best that way.

right i agree with. but unfortunately not everyone has this kind of thinking. most rich people think that the wealth they get is the result of their hard work so why should it be shared with the poor. they are poor because they are not smart and work hard. this is the way of thinking of some rich people who are greedy. so I think we need to invite our rich friends to think that sometimes the poor have worked hard but still have difficulty in making money. and our job is to help him by giving him the right job.

[Wodomi]

In fact, human games are a brutal competition. This is a historical testimony. Equal wealth is not suitable for human beings. Only some people cannot meet the progress of society. If everyone is satisfied, humanity will enter a recession civilization. But the help for the rogues is really too little. This is an era that we cannot change and can only be left to the people of the future to solve.

In reality, life is a competition, where to get something desired must go through a struggle that is not easy, even sometimes very hard. This hard work ethic must be cultivated in the poor so that gradually there will be improvements in their lives. Increased income does not come suddenly, but must be fought for.