Most of merit spend on local board. Although I don't know language but it's seems to me clear merit abuse. Hope DT will handle it. His last post on March 29, 2018. That's means he just woke up for merit abuse
.
How can you suspect a case of a merit abuse if you don't know the local language? It's understood if the account is generously giving out merits for the newbies to ran up provided we know if the legit posts are being counted. I don't see any merit abuse to use a DT member here.
Speaking of "legit" posts:
Mнe бoльшe нpaвитьcя caмoлeт, xoтя в дeтcтвe, кoнeчнo, пpeдпoчитaлa пoeзд
Agree with the post above. It so happened that I underestimated the project PundiX and just flipped after ICO. Now I have bought and very much believe in this project
I think ETH and Neo are very similar and Neo can soon catch up with ETH on capitalization. When this happens, the price of Neo will be greater! I would buy Neo
У мeня дoвoльнo xopoшo пoлyчaeтcя дo пepвoгo шoппингa
And so on. Facebook report? Yeah, not abuse
The flip side is, they will eventually get out of sMerits to send/sell. And if we have additional restrictions (more merit required for reaching a rank to wear a signature) down the road, that would be the end of hundreds of thousands of signature bounty abusers, as they will be out of merits to buy/send to their alts.
I honestly think 1 merit is too low amount to rank up account. Much better solution would be 5 merits to reach junior member rank, I am pretty sure giving negative feedback to one hero member account won't solve shitposting issue on 49+ ranked up junior member accounts.