Are Bounty Hunters also considered Investors?

[Arcanefist]

Investors want for the project to succeed. They even can wait for several year of development and to keep tokens from selling, if it is needed. Bounty campaign participants just sell every single token, which damages the speed of toker rate growth.

[paveel90]

I normally see some crypto projects which promise Investors certain amount of dividend depending on how much coin/token they own.

The word "Investors" is normally used for people who own shares of a particular project/company, but in cryptocurrency this "shares" normally refers to coins/tokens, which makes me wonder if bounty/airdrop hunters are also considered "Investors" since they hold certain quantity of these coins/token

I think that both investors and bounty campaigh participants are completely equal. Investors spend time to make money and invest them into certain ICO, while bounty hunters invest time itself. However, investors seem to be a little more motivated to me.

[tanvir232]

It's not a question even. Bounty hunters are not investors. They are indeed kind of employees who are hired for promoting the project. Without bounty hunters, ICOs will not be able to reach potential custormers.

[Iykecollinz]

I normally see some crypto projects which promise Investors certain amount of dividend depending on how much coin/token they own.

The word "Investors" is normally used for people who own shares of a particular project/company, but in cryptocurrency this "shares" normally refers to coins/tokens, which makes me wonder if bounty/airdrop hunters are also considered "Investors" since they hold certain quantity of these coins/token

If we see it from that perspective bounty hunters that keep their coins are in fact investors, which is why in those projects that ask for you to confirm your identity, not only the investors need to go through this process but bounty hunters as well, and it makes sense because they are getting a part of the coin and of the possible dividends, if any, the difference is that investors put money into the project while bounty hunters put their effort and time.

I agree with this explanation, the bounty hunters can indeed be called investors because of their time and effort in advancing a project that is why bounty hunters can be called investors

Exactly what I have wanted to posit, investment is in diverse forms, should not necessarily have to be with fund. But a Bountyhunter can decide to buy more of a token he believes in during ICO, but I think this would be more after launch

[leslie4u]

I think bounty hunters can be considered as investors because if not money they are investing their time to promote the project and this requires time and effort. It's difficult to actually find a good project to promote because many a time it turns out to be a scam especially ICO's and ERC20 tokens.

Now once the tokens or coins are received by the bounty hunter, he can decide what needs to be done with those. Either to sell or hold.

Nevertheless, bounties are a good source of income for many.

[fitzzz]

Bounty hunters are promoters of a project that maybe an investor as well if they see to it that the project is good in track and when they see the future of the project they endorsing.

[DarkNecromancer]

I would not consider participants of Bounty investors. They are assistants rather on development of the project as are engaged in advertizing and receive for it payment in tokens.

[Vargum]

Basically, investors are people who buy tokens on the ICO, bounty players in my opinion investors can not be considered, since they do not invest their personal funds, and spend only their time and usually sell their tokens as soon as they go to the stock exchange. Investors are more serious about the sale of coins, they need a profit from the invested funds.

[jusertvaz]

strange question. I think that if you have coins or tokens that you simply, the owner of the coins or tokens and have nothing to do with investing. If you invest money in projects and invest your coins then you can call yourself an investor

[bravehearth0319]

Bounty hunters who are paid with ICO tokens are not investors. Because the tokens that they received are rewards from doing tasks to promote the ICO. Investors are the ones who buy tokens to support the project. While bounty hunters after receiving the rewards usually dump their rewards.

[DevelopmentBank]

I normally see some crypto projects which promise Investors certain amount of dividend depending on how much coin/token they own.

The word "Investors" is normally used for people who own shares of a particular project/company, but in cryptocurrency this "shares" normally refers to coins/tokens, which makes me wonder if bounty/airdrop hunters are also considered "Investors" since they hold certain quantity of these coins/token

Technically, yes. But i would say, it depends.

If the bounty hunter holds the rewarded coins then i would say yes. He invested his resources (albeit, time) into the project and will get a reward for it. But then again, it depends on the bounty. Does the bounty pain in tokens or in some other fungible reward? What the reward is and what happens to it would give you a better idea.

[0t3p0t]

I normally see some crypto projects which promise Investors certain amount of dividend depending on how much coin/token they own.

The word "Investors" is normally used for people who own shares of a particular project/company, but in cryptocurrency this "shares" normally refers to coins/tokens, which makes me wonder if bounty/airdrop hunters are also considered "Investors" since they hold certain quantity of these coins/token

Yes of course as we invested our time and effort to gain coins/tokens from an ICO or bounty program. We also own shares by participating the bounty program so the only difference is that some uses other crypto as capital or fiat to invest while bounty hunters invest their time and effort. Both can be a scam victims so nothing can be that far from each other when in terms of risks but with bounty hunters risks are pretty low as we can afford to lose our time and effort if something goes wrong with the project we are in.

[Docbee]

From behavior, altitude of investors towards bounty hunters they are not considered as investors, i think they should be considered as investors.

[sergei1703]

I think yes, because some projects are very promising, and there is the reason to hold bounty tokens after crowdsale, because they can make 10x in a few month and it will be great

[Kovaleff]

Bountyhunter is more of an assistant in the promotion of the project.  I think he is not an investor.  But at the same time, nothing prevents him from investing in this project either.  So here is the question with two answers.

[yesyes18]

Well, i do get your point just that your assertion is a bit skeptical. Ideally, projects do specify when they're talking about those who'll receive the dividends (whether investors or non investors). Anyways at most times it's referring to any token holder. If they don't do that their tonens won't have any value and they wouldn't be able to get any competitive volume and prices at various exchanges. And pertaining to that, whether you're an aidropee, bounty hunter, investor or purchased at an exchange, you'll be good to go.

[Ochakemaput]

I think yes, because some projects are very promising, and there is the reason to hold bounty tokens after crowdsale, because they can make 10x in a few month and it will be great

whether with manahan assets from reward bounty is said to be as an investor? I think these two things is something very different. similarities in holding assets can not be said if the bounty hunter is the investor. the bounty is working on the team, but investors finance the work of the team and the bounty. should this kind of concept could we know there are three equations of the two.

[ARTIST 1991]

Personally I being a participant of Bounty of the companies practically did not invest in those projects in which I participated. I am a holder of tokens, but I do not consider myself the investor. I invested the time, but not money.

[bibka33]

Yes of course bounty hunters are considered investors because many of them keep coins for a long time in their wallet and do not sell them.

[trade2winnn]

Yes, because they invest their time to the project was known and untwisted as much as possible, as most of the bountists themselves still invest money and buy and sell cryptocurrencies, and recommend others, so Yes-this is a very large asset of the cryptocurrency market, as I know people who can invest and sell 10 thousand dollars,and all this with