Bounty Managers Opinion

[Rotanimod Eht]

Hello I saw many bounty campaigns and many bounty managers.
But to not waste my time and other person who propably will read this i write question.

Which Bounty Managers are good enough to instantly consider joining to his Campaigns because his promoted campaigns pay anything and after campaign go into exchange (ofcourse I consider only this campaigns who talk about listining on exchanges in roadmap). Have good contact with support and updating spreadsheets.

I make some research with many popular Bounty Campaigns (more than 10 000views on Bounty Thread) even support dont exist ofcourse officialy exist but in reality you dont receive any responds or responds will be not satisfying or just will be very hard to receive any respond. Something clarify if they dont have time for you or even with updating spreadsheet why they should have time to pay you anything.

I will be very happy if I hear good opinions

[capableuwa1]

Well I wouldn't say good Bounty manager because all Bounty participants are at the mercy of Bounty/Campaign Managers and the team project manager so rewarding Bounty hunters solemly depend on them. That's why you can always see written at the end of end Bounty thread that Bounty Manager have the final decision. So in addition, I still think there are good Bounty Manager out there, to mention a few like the Amazix, Wapinter, Btcltcdigger and many of them.

I think you will find more details about understanding what Bounty is and good Bounty Manager over here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5031657.msg45856516#msg45856516

[batang_bitcoin]

Check Overview of Bounty Managers

It's a list of bounty managers that are considerable and some of them are reputable with portfolio.

[hunnykaushal]

Krypital Group
Amazix Group
Bounty0x

They are good in handling good bounty programs and Krypital is my best.

[Afiqa03]

frankly, for the time being I personally followed the project campaign from the Amazig team, there were a few that I joined from the Bounty group group, all of them were initially fine, but sometimes failed in the middle of the ICO because they did not reach the goal plan at the beginning.

[kewlc3s]

AmaZix are good. At least got not scammed with them. Almost all campaigns are paid on time.
Clear rules, and objective evaluation.

[hotimbineh]

acknowledge that the prize manager who is the most successful in managing the gift program to date is yahoo62278 You can take part in all the gift programs he manages without doubt because you will definitely be paid on time because yahoo62278 is one of the managers who is highly credible and trustworthy

[Ridwan Fauzi]

You could search for a bounty campaign that is pursued by members who have a high rank like legendary members or hero members who have green trust. I have seen a lot of bounties campaign manager that were like that, and if they find that they were stuck with the project he is promoting, he will tell all the participants to end the project he leads, in other words the project is a scam. And also, I found many bounty campaigns ignorant of the projects he led if the project was a scam, which like this would make everyone disappointed with his credibility as a bounty manager.

Check Overview of Bounty Managers

It's a list of bounty managers that are considerable and some of them are reputable with portfolio.

Agreed with batang_bitcoin, all the managers mentioned there are very credible.

[Mastsetad]

AmaZix are good. At least got not scammed with them. Almost all campaigns are paid on time.
Clear rules, and objective evaluation.

I think you are not aware of dealjoy project and 2, 3 more projects who scammed bounties even Amazix was running them.. the fact is amazix is also not trustworthy when it comes on bounty programs.
you should always do your own diligence and join a bounty on your own risk. and do not blame a bounty manager.

[reflector]

AmaZix are good. At least got not scammed with them. Almost all campaigns are paid on time.
Clear rules, and objective evaluation.

I think you are not aware of dealjoy project and 2, 3 more projects who scammed bounties even Amazix was running them.. the fact is amazix is also not trustworthy when it comes on bounty programs.
you should always do your own diligence and join a bounty on your own risk. and do not blame a bounty manager.

It is common for all the bounty managers so we should not blame the managers because it is reach softcap surely it was listed in the market. My suggestion is bounty participation is little so we must carefully read the OP then only involve in any projects. Nowadays Yahoo is good signature and Bounty manager they run buzzshow bounty campaign but it is still not listed in the market. So don't judge the project scam we should analyse only responsible manager.

[sud]

Check Overview of Bounty Managers

It's a list of bounty managers that are considerable and some of them are reputable with portfolio.

Good thread, I would also add this one - Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers. It is a list of bounty managers who cares about quality on bitcointalk forum. Usually it means there are less participants (spammers are not allowed) so more rewards to real users.

[Earl Ragnaar]

Well it is important to look for the good bounty manager because some time the top bounty managers are will be managing the best bounties of all times. But the most important is that you should look for the team and the project and the investment of the project and the rating through different good sites.

If you are looking for the best bounty managers then look for irfan_pak10, wapinters and jamalaizaz and the amazex bounties these are he few things you should consider if you are participating in.

[BitcoinGuruOne]

The thing is that the biggest campaigns with most trusted managers often have very little profit in them because there often is small reward and huge number of people.
Do your own research, if the project is legit, then you will get paid also with non reputable managers.

[xsantana]

one of the information about Wapinter's prize manager that needs to be considered, currently prohibition of embezzlement and campaign is abused.

[jvdp]

This is really bad to hear but the bounty managers are really wanna give the accuracy on their works.

Sometime there will be hassle while they update mostly this issues happening from participants side only. As I see most participants just post as reserved and then fill out the details on weekly report. This awful actually we also need to give support for them.

[akihiro101117]

for me amazix group, kripital, aerys2 and arteezy. try other managers but this are the ones whom i know to be good and reasonable managers but dont be too dependent from it try others

[mamesso]

erickvand is also a good manager, he is very quick to respond to complaints and currently he is holding some good projects. including MCB and excolony.
everyone has a difference in assessing the manager's performance.

[batang_bitcoin]

Agreed with batang_bitcoin, all the managers mentioned there were very credible.

There's a voting process that's happening there.

Good thread, I would also add this one - Overview of Bitcointalk Signature Anti-Spam Campaign Managers. It is a list of bounty managers who cares about quality on bitcointalk forum. Usually it means there are less participants (spammers are not allowed) so more rewards to real users.

Those are the best managers in the forum but most of them are into bitcoin paying signature campaign only, these two overviews are the best references.

[sladkoejka]

AmaZix are good. At least got not scammed with them. Almost all campaigns are paid on time.
Clear rules, and objective evaluation.

I agree, an excellent team, work is always done qualitatively and without delays. support for them is also at a high level. and a big plus is that almost everywhere you need KYC, which scares off the botnists

[jankekek]

Bounty managers must be active so that they can take care the queries of the bounty participants. We all know that bounty managers plays the important role in the bounty campaigns because he/she is the one who is responsible for all bounty related questions and monitoring the works of the participants but we can't blame the bounty manager if we got nothing from the bounty we had participated because like us, they are also working to make money, bounties' success is still depends on the ICO's launching.