Rating sites for confidence?

[Diced90]

Rating sites should not be trusted, it is better to analyze the ico project yourself (if you know how to do it).

I totally agree with you. Rating sites are not to be trusted. These can easily be manipulated and mislead investors. One such example, is TripAdvisor, with many fake reviews.

[1714796016]

1714796016

[1714796016]

1714796016

[1714796016]

1714796016

[1714796016]

1714796016

[smoker36]

Rating sites is a pretty cool thing. It seems to me that they are able to provide accurate information about all ICO. I often visit them and they give me exactly what I need. Now they help me a lot in the search

[maldini]

In my opinion, I believe in this site that provides some information that we might have to reanalyze, because even though this site is famous they sometimes feel cheated by fake companies, so we have to be more careful in choosing before investing

[igor.vanyutin.83]

I usually trust the rating websites. I believe that they are checking the projects and have much more experience in this market. If an ICO has great ratings on more than 4 ICOrating websites, I invest in this project and wait for my profits.

[FLHippy]

ICOBench and other rating sites are very helpful. Here you can find interesting information about ICOs.

[Michelecako]

Rating sites are a very subjective way to evaluate a coin. As they say: a hundred sites - a hundred opinions. Personal analysis and collection of information about the coin is the best way to avoid mistakes and loss of money.

[Godday]

Rating sites should not be trusted, it is better to analyze the ico project yourself (if you know how to do it).

I totally agree with you. Rating sites are not to be trusted. These can easily be manipulated and mislead investors. One such example, is TripAdvisor, with many fake reviews.

indeed it can be manipulated, of course we have to be able to choose ico carefully because now the rating can be purchased to get more investors

[daviidalpert]

Rating website is only used as a reference when you participate in ico.We can't fully believe them.And we have to have our own judgment.

[siena23]

I do not fully believe, in my opinion trusting a site that says project A is good is a mistake, for me the meaning or content of the project is very important, if I read in detail that this project is very important, then I will look for the site or project rating.

[pungopete468]

Rating website is only used as a reference when you participate in ico.We can't fully believe them.And we have to have our own judgment.

Agree. we can only use it as an information relation to be able to get more complete information about ico not as an investment guide. because of course it is very risky if we only see the review rating

[Ctn]

Do you really think that there are any experts opinion as well. I believe it's not true rating on those ICO ranking sites. Most of them could be bought one and many of them are just putting some numbers so that their website can gain popularity and then gain some crowd for displaying the advertisement.

Many of you might just think this is not true, but this is the reality guys. I have seen that almost all the ICO that seek for the ranking are getting 80%++ green rating thus making it look like far legit. In reality we know that more than 80% ICO are scam. Lolz.

So do the math and tell me how they can be trusted anyways.

[Bitcoin_Speculator]

The majority of the score websites perform really do roundabout marketing associated with ICOs. We do not believe in any kind of score website which gathers charge with regard to itemizing or even critiquing any kind of ICOs on the website. Usually, perform your personal investigation about the ICO as well as talk about concerning the ICO about the forums/friends as well as arrived at the summary. Do not simply proceed blindly along with score websites.

[MD Nur Hossain]

The vast majority of status websites complete actually do roundabout marketing and advertising connected with ICOs. When I tend not to confidence almost any status web page of which gathers cost intended for a checklist or maybe going over almost any ICOs on their web page. Generally complete your individual exploration within the ICO, in addition, to examine around the ICO within the forums/friends, in addition, to go to realization. Tend not to simply just head out blindly having status websites.

[florianuhlemann]

I have not met any good websites in my work yet. basically I take information from different channels in telegram. there are proven channels, but they are paid)

[macstrong12]

The only site that I use to check ICO ranks is https://icodrops.com , I don't believe in other websites , most of them get pay to rank an ICO and they dont write reality.

[Gastotade]

The only site that I use to check ICO ranks is https://icodrops.com , I don't believe in other websites , most of them get pay to rank an ICO and they dont write reality.

Rating sites now are just used to know which project exist, there what about and plans, neverthan that ratings doesn't matter. It will be better to join in some forum or chats that discuss projects ability than seeking their ratings.

[mamesso]

Rating sites should not be trusted, it is better to analyze the ico project yourself (if you know how to do it).

I totally agree with you. Rating sites are not to be trusted. These can easily be manipulated and mislead investors. One such example, is TripAdvisor, with many fake reviews.

I heard that amazix has a problem with one of the ico review websites, I am afraid this will be a symbol of investor distrust of ico.
investors are so disadvantaged that they are no longer interested in ICO. there must be new rules about such websites.

[Rhosadah]

just looking at sites:
https://icobench.com
https://icorating.com
https://icomarks.com
as a reference to find out how far the project is running and see the rating.

[Denodeno]

Check out www.coinmey.com and https://cryptodiffer.com/

Personally I am using these two.

[coin_1122]

just looking at sites:
https://icobench.com
https://icorating.com
https://icomarks.com
as a reference to find out how far the project is running and see the rating.

Yes, the above-mentioned websites are very good for references because ICObench is giving a very good rating for the project which has huge potential in terms activity and team role in the project. We should not consider every project but we have to consider most rating projects.