Ico and sec regulations

[i7claufe]

At first, this is a bad idea for the crypto community. But as what is happening right now, this is the best move and what the community needs for a greater and better crypto community.

[samcrypto]

At first, this is a bad idea for the crypto community. But as what is happening right now, this is the best move and what the community needs for a greater and better crypto community.

So many fake ICO's and scam projects and I think being regulated by SEC can secure the trust of many investors again. This is what we need right now, the market is stable right now and there is no major improvements. If we want to see this market again, let's accept that government can really make this market more secure in the future.

[haruna69]

i think insurance
SEC not approv random things as they want like kids
but for investment security
so if it legal, the ico should be a really save and profit guarantee, if its not match the contract the ico owner could be sued in law
#imo

[desfira]

I don't care about SEC regulation. for any reason including protecting investors from losses, I am sure and believe that ICOs and crypto currencies will continue to develop without the SEC regulatoin. because we have our own community

I agree with you, because indeed an investor must be truly protected, because investors are a group of people who succeed in an ico.
without an investor, an ico cannot be said to be successful.

[WalkerIVIV]

I don't care about SEC regulation. for any reason including protecting investors from losses, I am sure and believe that ICOs and crypto currencies will continue to develop without the SEC regulatoin. because we have our own community

I agree with you, because indeed an investor must be truly protected, because investors are a group of people who succeed in an ico.
without an investor, an ico cannot be said to be successful.

And that's the reason why SEC was protecting their investors from ICO. Remember about what has already happened with centra and there will be a lot of lesson you can try to take a look on that case dude.
As you can see that how centra was being a scam project and CEO that used the money from ico to buy a super car.

[omonuyak]

So how the ico sales and buying will look like after sec will regulate the ico.

What will be changed for investor if the new system will be  for the ico-s ?

Many people are loosing money in icos investments because it is not regulated and those that were able to make money from icos were those that were able to invest on those good projects that come out last year and years before.  Sec need to regulate this market in other to bring sanity into it.

[pamsugas]

certainly no more scam if regulation ico is regulated
and ico will continue to be in demand by the public, but the ico regulation must be strict so that no one else will be harmed when the ico product is finished, it will still run real

[desfira]

I don't care about SEC regulation. for any reason including protecting investors from losses, I am sure and believe that ICOs and crypto currencies will continue to develop without the SEC regulatoin. because we have our own community

I agree with you, because indeed an investor must be truly protected, because investors are a group of people who succeed in an ico.
without an investor, an ico cannot be said to be successful.

And that's the reason why SEC was protecting their investors from ICO. Remember about what has already happened with centra and there will be a lot of lesson you can try to take a look on that case dude.
As you can see that how centra was being a scam project and CEO that used the money from ico to buy a super car.

indeed it becomes a very valuable lesson for all investors.
especially if you are a big investor, it is a risk that is quite hard to live.
a lot of scam projects now, which hurt many investors

[leavolnhals]

So how the ico sales and buying will look like after sec will regulate the ico.

What will be changed for investor if the new system will be  for the ico-s ?

Maybe it will change whole. Because the SEC wants every transaction to be transparent, more detailed. But it seems that the Crypto representative does not want this and that is why the SEC has refused to enter the Crypto market and canceled the Bitcoin ETF.

[CuriousGeorge]

i think so many ICO' restricted to USA citizen, and SEC yurisdiction is only USA citizen right? a lot of investor out of USA, not have to worried about SEC

Not true. I've just gone through the process and we will be available to both U.S. and foreign investors.

What you are probably thinking about is the fact that SEC regulated companies must be based in the U.S.

All of companies that issued Bitcoin ETF applications are based in the US but so many times they are all getting rejected or even ignored by SEC. It's a bit difficul to explain but to fill all of SEC compliances look so difficult. We will see another rejection to the bitcoin ETF in the future and that's just the matter of time.

[nl247]

At first, this is a bad idea for the crypto community. But as what is happening right now, this is the best move and what the community needs for a greater and better crypto community.

So many fake ICO's and scam projects and I think being regulated by SEC can secure the trust of many investors again. This is what we need right now, the market is stable right now and there is no major improvements. If we want to see this market again, let's accept that government can really make this market more secure in the future.

That is actually the main idea and in as much as some people may want to have some problem with regulation, I believe in the long run it would bring more good than harm.

We sure see without some form of law in place, it is human nature for some to want to do things the way they like and try to steal from investors. The trust is diminishing in the ICO space, and we keep seeing shit coins evolving every day and some naïve investors still falling into the trap, with regulations, it would really reduce a whole lot of that and bring about a more matured space for investors and even bigger ones to want to come into the space which is a good thing.

[jawakoak]

ICO is needed regulation for protecting investor, so many ICO scam and run with investors money..but SEC just protecting USA citizen

[XIE-XIE]

So how the ico sales and buying will look like after sec will regulate the ico.

What will be changed for investor if the new system will be  for the ico-s ?

Has this been done, I think it must be done, I think the current model is not completely safe, let alone many ico scams happen when the price of bcc goes down

[desfira]

certainly no more scam if regulation ico is regulated
and ico will continue to be in demand by the public, but the ico regulation must be strict so that no one else will be harmed when the ico product is finished, it will still run real

yeah right bro, and hopefully with this regulation all ico will be successful and legit.
so investors will return to buy coins on ico.
and this is not just an investor who will feel it, but the bounties will feel it

[purtoricopirate]

May as well stay away from ICOs, the only reason why people were making money before was because hype.

None of the hype exists anymore.

[dodgrad]

May as well stay away from ICOs, the only reason why people were making money before was because hype.

None of the hype exists anymore.

Unfortunately, many people think like you. Regulations are needed - especially to save people like you from losing money - without regulation, this money is unrecoverable without long-term processes. Personally, I am against regulations, but when I look at how people lose money irretrievably just because of their stupidity, I have to agree that legal regulations are needed.

[Casdinyard]

So how the ico sales and buying will look like after sec will regulate the ico.

What will be changed for investor if the new system will be  for the ico-s ?

Expect the market to be cleanse from shitty ico trying to earn a quick buck, or projects with vague ideas created with the sole purpose to attract investors only to exit scam at a later time.

Having a regulatorty framework making sure that the cryptosphere stays "healthy" from ico scams will help investors to trust the project they're investing in as ICOs will go through severe rules and only legitimate projects will survive. Hopefully, things will change for the better, and regulations will help attract more capital in the crypto ecosystem in the future.

And if icos gets regulated we will be having a fresh start for crypto space and people with evil plans will think twice before they execute their plan. Hopefully a strong regulation will further happen and those who have been guilty should be penalize.

However, this will take a lot of time to happen since SEC is still in the middle of ETF and ico regulation needed a lot of talk.

[upsidedown75]

I don't care about SEC regulation. for any reason including protecting investors from losses, I am sure and believe that ICOs and crypto currencies will continue to develop without the SEC regulatoin. because we have our own community

I agree with you, because indeed an investor must be truly protected, because investors are a group of people who succeed in an ico.
without an investor, an ico cannot be said to be successful.

We have all seen over the years that without regulation, the possibility of seeing the space being corrupted by so called scammers and gullible investors will always be there and it is obviously something that would be needed to put some law and policies in place which I believe the SEC will be smart about it, rather than bringing up a regulation that would affect the space hugely.

In that case, I believe that a lot of shit projects will go into hiding and it would be hard to see scammers trying to show their face when investors can easily verify if they are complaint regulation-wise or not. I believe this would help the space to mature pretty fast, build confidence among investors and then grow.

[Questat]

I don't care about SEC regulation. for any reason including protecting investors from losses, I am sure and believe that ICOs and crypto currencies will continue to develop without the SEC regulatoin. because we have our own community

I agree with you, because indeed an investor must be truly protected, because investors are a group of people who succeed in an ico.
without an investor, an ico cannot be said to be successful.

We have all seen over the years that without regulation, the possibility of seeing the space being corrupted by so called scammers and gullible investors will always be there and it is obviously something that would be needed to put some law and policies in place which I believe the SEC will be smart about it, rather than bringing up a regulation that would affect the space hugely.

In that case, I believe that a lot of shit projects will go into hiding and it would be hard to see scammers trying to show their face when investors can easily verify if they are complaint regulation-wise or not. I believe this would help the space to mature pretty fast, build confidence among investors and then grow.

That would eventually happen in the long run, but currently, the scammers are continually enjoying their profit from the newbie.
Even with lack of regulation but as long as people will not rush to investing, I mean they should make a research, educate themselves, it could help minimize the scams.

[kolonel_x]

I think if there is a regulation about the ICO, it is quite convenient for the protection of investors' funds and it is certain that IO is a really convincing person who will be there. And reduce the impact of fraud.