30 percent of tokens nowhere to be found on cryptocurrency exchanges

[vit05]

today

A large number of ICOs have a reputation of worthless projects which do not have anything apart from a whitepaper. According to a new report by Diar, it is perfectly reflected in their price as tokens struggle to keep their initial price, while 30 percent of ICOs are not listed on a single exchange.   
Going underwater
According to the abovementioned report, 70 percent of crypto tokens that didn’t make it to the top 100 currencies on CoinMarketCap fail to meet investors’ expectations, plunging below their initial value. At the same time, more than 30 percent of ICOs that were launched in 2017-2018 are not listed on any cryptocurrency exchange. Some developers behind these unlisted tokens even failed to provide the information about the distribution of token supply while raking in over $1 bln. Among these tokens, which have almost zero liquidly, there are some big-name projects in the likes of Bancor that raised a whopping $150 mln this February.     

As U.Today has already reported, over 800 ICOs have already gone bust in just 18 months. Meanwhile, it is widely speculated that the dwindling interest in ICOs is inextricably connected to the plunging Ethereum price.

[1714797657]

1714797657

[1714797657]

1714797657

[1714797657]

1714797657

[1714797657]

1714797657

[1714797657]

1714797657

[zauna35]

Oh, I think the percentage of tokens that never saw the exchange undervaluation ) of course the cryptocurrency sector and ICO needs to be reformed, I hope that they will happen soon, all the hype settles, the new, prospectively and ensure the projects will be on the market..well it's my dreams ) thank you for the information.

[Bttzed03]

An ICO funded project should atleast be listed on exchanges! There should be no excuse why it's not even listed. This is why better regulations should be set for new ICO's.

[bartolo]

You have to take into account certain circumstances. For example, entering an exchange right now is no guarantee of success, many coins and tokens hit an exchange and are dumped to the floor and forgotten. This is why some ICO teams are intentionally delaying their entry into exchanges until market circumstances improve or there is a strong demand for their coin or token.

[iconoclast]

There is a new trend of exchanges themselves sponsoring an ICO and thereby guaranteeing a listing once the coin is distributed. I imagine that this may become something that ICO investors may start demanding before they invest. I would much rather see market based solutions like this to improve the quality of ICO markets rather than having increased regulation.

[lubah]

Oh, I think the percentage of tokens that never saw the exchange undervaluation ) of course the cryptocurrency sector and ICO needs to be reformed, I hope that they will happen soon, all the hype settles, the new, prospectively and ensure the projects will be on the market..well it's my dreams ) thank you for the information.

I agree. You say a too small number.
In August, I heard the figure of 1800 all coins issued, by September this figure had grown to 2000, and today probably even more. Taking into account that every day 2-5 new ICO companies are opened, therefore by the end of September there will be exactly 2200 coins. But from them on the exchange about 30-40% and the rest are just waiting or dusting on your purse etherium.
I will reconsider.
Slag, garbage and all shit so much that sometimes I look at the information about the company's bounty and I understand that this is a scum, it's all very obvious ..

[cryptolidus]

After ICO fundraising ends,  many of them are not in hurry to list their tokens on exchanges. They refer to the market
situation, slow administration at exchanges etc. I do not say they are all scams but not fulfilling  their promises on time.
This is why we need global regulations for ICOs to secure the investments from an improper behavior.

[BitProNews]

This should also include some cryptocurrencies that are in the top 100 coinmarketcap because not yet acheiving their milestones and not backed by any product yet (some of them has a prototype since a year which is not running at all). Most of those 30% had to be delisted from exchanges long time ago.

[felicanoma]

I see that the market for tokens that are not listed on the coinmarketcap is there but the market is not too crowded, it could be the lack of confidence of investors because they are not listed on the coinmarketcap.
Yes, this year a lot of projects that were nearly 70% failed and scams, I think that there are hands of fraudsters who just want to make a profit, obviously many ICO fail because they are also affected by falling token prices and make investors prefer tokens or Existing coins instead of taking risks by buying tokens or coins that have just arrived.

[bitkanu]

today

A large number of ICOs have a reputation of worthless projects which do not have anything apart from a whitepaper. According to a new report by Diar, it is perfectly reflected in their price as tokens struggle to keep their initial price, while 30 percent of ICOs are not listed on a single exchange.   
Going underwater
According to the abovementioned report, 70 percent of crypto tokens that didn’t make it to the top 100 currencies on CoinMarketCap fail to meet investors’ expectations, plunging below their initial value. At the same time, more than 30 percent of ICOs that were launched in 2017-2018 are not listed on any cryptocurrency exchange. Some developers behind these unlisted tokens even failed to provide the information about the distribution of token supply while raking in over $1 bln. Among these tokens, which have almost zero liquidly, there are some big-name projects in the likes of Bancor that raised a whopping $150 mln this February.     

As U.Today has already reported, over 800 ICOs have already gone bust in just 18 months. Meanwhile, it is widely speculated that the dwindling interest in ICOs is inextricably connected to the plunging Ethereum price.

These guys are searching which is the best ico to make them all being rich person instantly as far as i know the ico gives a lot of impact to the price of ethereum. remember when EOS crowdsale has been contributing more than 1 millions ethereum to be invested in the EOS crowdsale? it looks enough to give a lot of insight abou that dude.
ico still on its demand.

[rodel caling]

Oh, I think the percentage of tokens that never saw the exchange undervaluation ) of course the cryptocurrency sector and ICO needs to be reformed, I hope that they will happen soon, all the hype settles, the new, prospectively and ensure the projects will be on the market..well it's my dreams ) thank you for the information.

Probably that is true this not surprised we all know if the coin aren't useful or nithing value un the market need to delete in the list because the cmc is very crowded because a lot coins not vaualables

[kidsrock]

I think it because of the ethereum price is down too deep and it pushes the token don't have a price in the exchange, and this makes the dev to delay their request to get a list on the exchange. I agree that 30 percents of tokens are not worth in the market and many of them still trying to get a new price but with the market situations now, it still difficult to them to get the normal price even to get the ICO price.

[ivanleon]

Entertaining statistics, which shows that the process of ICO is time to change. Investors need proof that the project will be successful. I think some projects do not try at all, because they essentially only have an idea. At this rate, the ICO market may simply collapse.

[Zdraste16]

Oh, I think the percentage of tokens that never saw the exchange undervaluation ) of course the cryptocurrency sector and ICO needs to be reformed, I hope that they will happen soon, all the hype settles, the new, prospectively and ensure the projects will be on the market..well it's my dreams ) thank you for the information.

Well, why just dreams.  The trend of falling prices for a larger percentage, almost all coins, is observed every year.  Many projects simply do not want to display their product in such a market, with the risk of failure.  Most analysts predict growth and market recovery.  We wait.

[BADBITCH]

Such projects cannot be found on exchanges because they are spam or shit tokens and no exchange would accommodate such coin

And further more, sometimes after ico the project devs run away with every profit and the project ends up in loss for every investor

[dizzy1996]

The question is certainly interesting, but, of course, each project intends to enter the exchange and implement tokens, but this procedure is not always fast, stock exchanges have many requirements for the project, and sometimes their implementation can take some time, but, of course, there are fraudulent projects that raise funds and hide

[iconoclast]

today

A large number of ICOs have a reputation of worthless projects which do not have anything apart from a whitepaper. According to a new report by Diar, it is perfectly reflected in their price as tokens struggle to keep their initial price, while 30 percent of ICOs are not listed on a single exchange.   
Going underwater
According to the abovementioned report, 70 percent of crypto tokens that didn’t make it to the top 100 currencies on CoinMarketCap fail to meet investors’ expectations, plunging below their initial value. At the same time, more than 30 percent of ICOs that were launched in 2017-2018 are not listed on any cryptocurrency exchange. Some developers behind these unlisted tokens even failed to provide the information about the distribution of token supply while raking in over $1 bln. Among these tokens, which have almost zero liquidly, there are some big-name projects in the likes of Bancor that raised a whopping $150 mln this February.     

As U.Today has already reported, over 800 ICOs have already gone bust in just 18 months. Meanwhile, it is widely speculated that the dwindling interest in ICOs is inextricably connected to the plunging Ethereum price.

Makes it really attractive to see recent changes such as exchanges sponsoring ICO's. At least with an exchange sponsored ICO you can be sure that the tokens will get listed on an exchange. Too many project do not seem to make an effort getting listed even though they attracted money by promising liquidity. They mistakenly think they will escape the market down turn by delaying the listing. What they are doing is leaving themselves open to fraud charges for raising money with false promises.

[Cryptomilz]

Shit and scam projects have no ambition, and like the scam they are, they're mostly intended to generate ETH from the investing public while leaving them with useless tokens that never make to the exchanges. Many of such projects are replete in the space. They delay listing citing flimsy reasons and that's it.

[cryptolidus]

Many ICOs raise funds and they are not progressing with the development, no product, no functionality.
In those circumstances there is no sense for listing on exchanges. ICO market need regulation.

[coin-investor]

That's a huge number and people still fall for this kind of ICO that are pump and dump and do not bring anything to the table, people should be wiser and go for long-term project something that the internet and the crypto community can use for a long time.