Mining on my RTX 2080 Ti - Hashrates and Power Draws

[TheLifeOfAMiner]

This is a quick overview: https://youtu.be/qrJgUxMkm0o  (This is using Nicehash only, so stats are not all correct)

Mining Lyra2REv2: https://youtu.be/0Ynl673L5X8

Mining Ravencoin: https://youtu.be/hox2oXLdo9o


Mining Lyra2REv2
Overview:
Just sharing my findings mining Lyra2REv2 with my RTX 2080 Ti. Overclock and Power Draw.

All the stats are below.

My computer is idle at 63W.

Stock Settings (Intensity at 18 default)
93.73MH/s @ 321W (whole system)
258W GPU only
0.3633 MHs/W

Tweaking Miner Settings. Intensity at 24.
111.92 MH/s @ 321W (whole system)     +18.19MH/s
258W GPU only                                             +0W
0.4338 MHs/W        +0.0705

Max OC Settings and Tweaking Miner Settings
Power Limit at 100 and Core Clock at +110. Intensity at 24.
121.16MH/s @ 321W (whole system)      +9.24MH/s
258W GPU only                                             +0W
0.4696 MHs/W        +0.0358

Power Limit at 90 and Core Clock at +110. Intensity at 24.
116.89MH/s @ 292W (whole system)      -4.27MH/s
229W GPU only                                              -29W
0.5104 MHs/W        +0.0408

Power Limit at 80 and Core Clock at +110. Intensity at 24.
112.08MH/s @ 265W (whole system)       -4.81MH/s
202W GPU only                                              -27W
0.5549 MHs/W          +0.0445

Power Limit at 70 and Core Clock at +110. Intensity at 24.
105.12MH/s @ 235W (whole system)       -6.96MH/s
172W GPU only                                               -30W
0.6112 MHs/W           +0.0563

Power Limit at 60 and Core Clock at +110. Intensity at 24.
91.28MH/s @ 208W (whole system)          -13.84MH/s
145W GPU only                                               -27W              
0.6295 MHs/W           +0.0183

Adjusting Memory at -500
Crashes the program in like 20 mins.



Mining Ravencoin
Quick overview:
Sharing results mining Ravencoin on my RTX 2080 Ti.  Hashrates and Power Draws.

Stats below:
About 2 hours of testing for each setting.

Miner: z-enemy
Pool: ravenminer.com

Stats:
NiceHash averaging around 19MH/s
z-enemy miner, mining on pool ravenminer.com, averaging around 38MH/s

My computer is idle at 63W.

Stock Settings - Intensity at 21
Power Limit 100
Range from 30MH/s -50MH/s
Average 38MH/s @ 320W (whole system)
257W GPU only
0.1479 MHs/W

Power Limit at 90
Range from 29MH/s -45MH/s
Average 37MH/s @ 292W (whole system)      -1MH/s
229W GPU only                   -28W
0.1616 MHs/W                    +0.0137

Power Limit at 80
Range from 26MH/s -43MH/s
Average 36MH/s @ 261W (whole system)      -1MH/s
198W GPU only                   -31W
0.1818 MHs/W                    +0.0202


Power Limit at 70
Range from 25MH/s -42MH/s
Average 35MH/s @ 235W (whole system)      -1MH/s
172W GPU only                   -26W
0.2035 MHs/W                    +0.0217

Power Limit at 60
Range from 25MH/s -29MH/s
Average 27MH/s @ 208W (whole system)      -8MH/s
145W GPU only                   -28W
0.1862 MHs/W                    -0.0173

(2 hours is too short of testing, but wanted to share an quick overview)


Quick compare to RTX 2080
Power Limit at 100
Test Bench Computer idle at 40W
Range from 22MH/s -31MH/s
Average 27MH/s @ 260W (whole system)
220W GPU only
0.1227 MHs/W


Happy Mining!

[1715385024]

1715385024

[1715385024]

1715385024

[Marvell2]

They must need optimized miners or something, this seems  leven worse than the 2080ti price per watt.

a 1080ti does 28 mhs at say 280 watts, does not crack 30 tho so 18 to 28 at powerlimit 80 on raven

if a 2080ti is 35 to 45 at 260 watts at 80 percent thsts bad considering the card costs near double

[whitesites]

Thanks for sharing.
It performs better than I was expecting.
Still considering the price point it would need to hash more than 2x faster than a 1080 ti.
Your data shows its only doing about 40% - 50% faster.
try T-Rex Miner. I have found it to be slightly faster than CryptoDredge and Zenemy
Let me know how it performs using that.

[jazz1984]

They must need optimized miners or something, this seems  leven worse than the 2080ti price per watt.

a 1080ti does 28 mhs at say 280 watts, does not crack 30 tho so 18 to 28 at powerlimit 80 on raven

if a 2080ti is 35 to 45 at 260 watts at 80 percent thsts bad considering the card costs near double

I would choose from the following modes for ravencoin:
Power Limit at 70
Range from 25MH / s -42MH / s
Average 35MH / s @ 235W (whole system) -1MH / s
172W GPU only -26W
0.2035 MHs / W +0.0217

And if we compare the last mode with the PL60 for raven, then we get twice less consumption compared to what you wrote. Not such a bad result.

[Marvell2]

They must need optimized miners or something, this seems  leven worse than the 2080ti price per watt.

a 1080ti does 28 mhs at say 280 watts, does not crack 30 tho so 18 to 28 at powerlimit 80 on raven

if a 2080ti is 35 to 45 at 260 watts at 80 percent thsts bad considering the card costs near double

I would choose from the following modes for ravencoin:
Power Limit at 70
Range from 25MH / s -42MH / s
Average 35MH / s @ 235W (whole system) -1MH / s
172W GPU only -26W
0.2035 MHs / W +0.0217

And if we compare the last mode with the PL60 for raven, then we get twice less consumption compared to what you wrote. Not such a bad result.

id still go with a 1080ti at 80 powlim at half the price

[revenant2017]

They must need optimized miners or something, this seems  leven worse than the 2080ti price per watt.

a 1080ti does 28 mhs at say 280 watts, does not crack 30 tho so 18 to 28 at powerlimit 80 on raven

if a 2080ti is 35 to 45 at 260 watts at 80 percent thsts bad considering the card costs near double

I would choose from the following modes for ravencoin:
Power Limit at 70
Range from 25MH / s -42MH / s
Average 35MH / s @ 235W (whole system) -1MH / s
172W GPU only -26W
0.2035 MHs / W +0.0217

And if we compare the last mode with the PL60 for raven, then we get twice less consumption compared to what you wrote. Not such a bad result.

id still go with a 1080ti at 80 powlim at half the price

Half the price means those cards that has already been used already? It's really hard to find brand new 1080ti's right now.

[Marvell2]

They must need optimized miners or something, this seems  leven worse than the 2080ti price per watt.

a 1080ti does 28 mhs at say 280 watts, does not crack 30 tho so 18 to 28 at powerlimit 80 on raven

if a 2080ti is 35 to 45 at 260 watts at 80 percent thsts bad considering the card costs near double

I would choose from the following modes for ravencoin:
Power Limit at 70
Range from 25MH / s -42MH / s
Average 35MH / s @ 235W (whole system) -1MH / s
172W GPU only -26W
0.2035 MHs / W +0.0217

And if we compare the last mode with the PL60 for raven, then we get twice less consumption compared to what you wrote. Not such a bad result.

id still go with a 1080ti at 80 powlim at half the price

Half the price means those cards that has already been used already? It's really hard to find brand new 1080ti's right now.

https://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20601294835%20601295933

brand new $699

seen them as low as 649

[agapes]

ok i got my RTX 2080 Ti today too
and this is picture of bencharking for both 2080 and 2080Ti

https://imgur.com/a/1loLc2i

im super sad that waste my money on these 2 cards

[whitesites]

ok i got my RTX 2080 Ti today too
and this is picture of bencharking for both 2080 and 2080Ti

https://imgur.com/a/1loLc2i

im super sad that waste my money on these 2 cards

Either that is joke, or you really don't know what you are doing.

[vuli1]

Nicehash is not optimized by default that much. You need to add extra flags for each config and than benchmarks will be better, or simply use Claymore's stuff,...

[jazz1984]

Hey. Enemy announced the new version of the miner Z-ENEMY VER 1.22 with the support of the new 20x0 series and cuda 10, it would be interesting to see your tests. Thank you. Here link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3378390.msg46580626#msg46580626

[agapes]

ok tested with new z-enemy for both card RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti

https://imgur.com/a/0NaN4KJ