Coingambling.io - A Bitcoin Gambling Review Site and Directory

[goliathhh]

Our mission is to test and write reviews about different BTC gambling sites. We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support. We cover: roulette, dice, poker, sportsbetting, slots, blackjack, lottery and baccarat.

We are developing an application to filter all the sites based their availability in different countries.

Visit coingambling.io to find the best BTC gambling site for your favourite game.

[1714994411]

1714994411

[1714994411]

1714994411

[1714994411]

1714994411

[panjul07]

Revise your title first, it is Goingambling while it should be Coingambling. I got nowhere when I tried to visit Goingambling, title is the first thing to attract reader so there should not be a mistake. Overall your site looks good although it is just like another bitcoin gambling review sites.
There are many sites to be added especially under the dice site category. Look around at this gambling board and you'll find many dice sites these days.
Suggestion, adding screenshots on your review could help your readers to know about the site better. Screenshot is simple thing but it gives more attraction than long words review IMO.

[goliathhh]

Thanks for directing our attention to this. A stupid mistake by us  . Now corrected .

[BTCevo]

Already checked on your site and it seems that you are lack of giving a full details on what you do and you even put sites thst have some issues with them. Like bitstarz for examples, do not know if they already fix it or not. And I tried to check on the dice site, you put safedice mean while they are having pending issue. Mostly bitstarz is include on you said best part, I do not know if this is paid advertise or not. But this is only what I thought at the first time I saw the site. You should do more research to have better comparison site

[milewilda]

Already checked on your site and it seems that you are lack of giving a full details on what you do and you even put sites thst have some issues with them. Like bitstarz for examples, do not know if they already fix it or not. And I tried to check on the dice site, you put safedice mean while they are having pending issue. Mostly bitstarz is include on you said best part, I do not know if this is paid advertise or not. But this is only what I thought at the first time I saw the site. You should do more research to have better comparison site

Thats the hassle on making a gambling  review site yet it would really be broad and would need up time when it comes to maintaining updated informations or issues towards the site. This would really in result
to miss out those issues due to lots of areas would be needed to review.This is why i dont really appreciate too much about review sites and i do rather look up on main threads of such gambling sites
and would make my own observation basing on what other gamblers do saw on that one than on relying on a single review made by review sites.

[BTCevo]

Already checked on your site and it seems that you are lack of giving a full details on what you do and you even put sites thst have some issues with them. Like bitstarz for examples, do not know if they already fix it or not. And I tried to check on the dice site, you put safedice mean while they are having pending issue. Mostly bitstarz is include on you said best part, I do not know if this is paid advertise or not. But this is only what I thought at the first time I saw the site. You should do more research to have better comparison site

Thats the hassle on making a gambling  review site yet it would really be broad and would need up time when it comes to maintaining updated informations or issues towards the site. This would really in result
to miss out those issues due to lots of areas would be needed to review.This is why i dont really appreciate too much about review sites and i do rather look up on main threads of such gambling sites
and would make my own observation basing on what other gamblers do saw on that one than on relying on a single review made by review sites.

Not all site are giving this kind of explanation, I do not say that he is wrong but before he can claim that their review is accurate, they should at least giving out their time to make some research about issues that is happening on each site that they played. I think there are many unsolved issue on their site yet they just publish it without giving some thought on it

[goliathhh]

As the Khabib vs Mcregor match is coming up we decided to compare the prices for mis match from the most known BTC sportsbooks. Here are the results:

Bookie           Khabib   McGregor   Bookie edge
Betcoin Sports   1,60           2,40           4,17%
Sportsbet.io   1,53           2,30           8,84%
Betking           1,60           2,35           5,05%
Cloudbet           1,55           2,45           5,33%
Jetwin           1,50           2,40           8,33%
mBitcasino   1,56           2,45           4,92%
NitrogenSports   1,58           2,49           3,45%


Hopefully this is helpful to someone. You can read more about this from our blog.

[game-protect]

How do you help victims?

Based on our experience the problem is not to find a gambling site, the problem is to enforce claims after being scammed!

[milewilda]

Already checked on your site and it seems that you are lack of giving a full details on what you do and you even put sites thst have some issues with them. Like bitstarz for examples, do not know if they already fix it or not. And I tried to check on the dice site, you put safedice mean while they are having pending issue. Mostly bitstarz is include on you said best part, I do not know if this is paid advertise or not. But this is only what I thought at the first time I saw the site. You should do more research to have better comparison site

Thats the hassle on making a gambling  review site yet it would really be broad and would need up time when it comes to maintaining updated informations or issues towards the site. This would really in result
to miss out those issues due to lots of areas would be needed to review.This is why i dont really appreciate too much about review sites and i do rather look up on main threads of such gambling sites
and would make my own observation basing on what other gamblers do saw on that one than on relying on a single review made by review sites.

Not all site are giving this kind of explanation, I do not say that he is wrong but before he can claim that their review is accurate, they should at least giving out their time to make some research about issues that is happening on each site that they played. I think there are many unsolved issue on their site yet they just publish it without giving some thought on it

Accurate on the first or starting days but sooner or later there would be such changes and its important that it would be list out or do make active updates regarding on such changes.
If they can able to retain on that kind of way then people would love to visit out to make it as a good preference on whats the current status on the possible gambling sites which one would tend to play.

[kryptqnick]

Well, I must say that your website is better than most of analogous sites I've seen. At least here there are a lot of casinos and we can see that the top ones are really chosen at least loosely accurate (somehow, I've seen about 5 websites that are rating casinos and put some casinos I never even heard of in the top list, while not saying anything about the most famous ones). Your list of various crypto casinos is also fairly long. The reviews mention a lot of useful info, which is also a good thing. What I think would help to make the site even better is if you aded a sort of a blacklist of casinos as well, because IMO it's not as important to get the best bonuses as not to get scammed.

[BTCevo]

Already checked on your site and it seems that you are lack of giving a full details on what you do and you even put sites thst have some issues with them. Like bitstarz for examples, do not know if they already fix it or not. And I tried to check on the dice site, you put safedice mean while they are having pending issue. Mostly bitstarz is include on you said best part, I do not know if this is paid advertise or not. But this is only what I thought at the first time I saw the site. You should do more research to have better comparison site

Thats the hassle on making a gambling  review site yet it would really be broad and would need up time when it comes to maintaining updated informations or issues towards the site. This would really in result
to miss out those issues due to lots of areas would be needed to review.This is why i dont really appreciate too much about review sites and i do rather look up on main threads of such gambling sites
and would make my own observation basing on what other gamblers do saw on that one than on relying on a single review made by review sites.

Not all site are giving this kind of explanation, I do not say that he is wrong but before he can claim that their review is accurate, they should at least giving out their time to make some research about issues that is happening on each site that they played. I think there are many unsolved issue on their site yet they just publish it without giving some thought on it

Accurate on the first or starting days but sooner or later there would be such changes and its important that it would be list out or do make active updates regarding on such changes.
If they can able to retain on that kind of way then people would love to visit out to make it as a good preference on whats the current status on the possible gambling sites which one would tend to play.

But what he serves right now is not all fully good, there is something unmentioned there. And the issues already been there before he started to post it, yet he keeps staying like that. This should be updated with current situation but until now I see that there is no progress at all. They will mislead someone if they do not change it asap

[JollyGood]

Our mission is to test and write reviews about different BTC gambling sites. We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support. We cover: roulette, dice, poker, sportsbetting, slots, blackjack, lottery and baccarat.

We are developing an application to filter all the sites based their availability in different countries.

Visit coingambling.io to find the best BTC gambling site for your favourite game.

How do you weigh up the difference of opinion from what you see when you manually test a gambling website versus what is said about either the owners, investors and developers on various forums?

If you even think of adding scamming gambling websites to your list you will lose any credibility you might generate in future.

Do those websites pay you to get listed after review?

https://coingambling.io/cloudbet-review/ there has been a lot of activity in the Cloudbet thread here in this forum surely that should be taken in to account when users highlighted issues such as lack of cookie notification and not having GDPR European Law. So I cannot agree with all what was written in your review.

Stake, Primedice and Bitsler are excellent looking sites with excellent reputations but Betking has a disastrous reputation because of the way they promoted a non-existent 50 BTC dice game and the way its owner Dean Nolan fooled ICO investors to part with over $6.5 million which was never spent on the things the ICO whitepaper stated.

Your reviews should include more background too because when scammers like Dean Nolan and Betking can siphon off ICO funds to their own pockets then they do not deserve a positive review even if the website looks respectable.

[AOL]

We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support.

Have you tested Chain-Bet.com?

[game-protect]

If I followed your advice and get scammed, will you help me?

[goliathhh]

We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support.

Have you tested Chain-Bet.com?

Added 

[game-protect]

We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support.

How do you test safety?

[examplens]

We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support.

How do you test safety?

It is interesting to question, It's not the same if you do withdraw 0.01 BTC and 20BTC. It's usually a problem if the larger amount is concerned and you can only confirm this after having had such an experience.

[BitplayClub]

What do you think about our site https://bitplay.club/ ?

[JollyGood]

We test all sites manually and rate them based on their user experience, safety, security, promotions, speed of transactions and customer support.

How do you test safety?

They do not seem to test site security, they just review the gaming experience.

[leowonderful]

The site seems interesting at a glance, but it's also a bit annoying to navigate on mobile- when I click on the top left slider menu to see tabs like reviews, sports betting, etc, the theme is transparent grey instead of a solid, opaque color like black that makes things a bit difficult to read. I can't find an easy way to screenshot this, but I find this makes it a bit difficult to browse the site on a mobile device. Everything seems decent browsing the site from my desktop though, nothing too special or lacking.